Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote: I have a Furuno 1621 MkII radar that I've never been happy with. At this point I believe that the radome has basically failed and I'm planning on replacing the entire system. snipped for brevity My typical use of radar is at night where I have the range set to about 8 nm or to watch for squalls, where the extended range would be useful. There's a huge difference in cost between the two. The 2KW unit runs around $900 and the 4KW unit runs about $1600. Based upon my usage and setup, is the additional cost worth it? Are there other things that I should be thinking of? Thanks, Geoff The basic difference is that the 4Kw T/R Unit will have a better modulaor and pulse forming network than the 2kw T/R. If it has a larger antenna, then it will have a correspondingly smaller Horozontal Beamwidth, which means it will discriminate between two closely spaced targets at a greater range. It will also tend to show returns from smaller targets, like logs and floating debris. The receivers will be very similar in Noise Figure and Sensitivity, but the bigger Transmitter Pulse and Antenna Gain (If a bigger antenna) will make it a much better radar. Also bigger T/R's usually have the PPR (Pulse Repetition Rate) split into more ranges so you have a much nicer Target Definition, than the standard two on the small T/R's. If you can afford it, Bigger is Better. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radomes: 2KW vs 4KW | Cruising |