Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Gary Schafer
 
Posts: n/a
Default depth finder transducer frequency question

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:53:39 GMT, "Henry" wrote:

A lot of talk here of audio signal generators.

Although depth sounders are referred to as "sonar" they do not work at audio
frequencies.

Hi-Fi equipment can work up to 20K (salesmen and status-seekers will clain
more)
This is the upper level for people with good hearing. By the time we can
afford boats and gadgets out hearing has deteriorated to much below this.

Modern depth sounders work at 200K. This is radio frequency.

Some years ago the most popular channel on BBC radio was on 200k. It would
seem that, if you wish to test your fishfinder, you might be better off
using a thirty year old European broadcast receiver and hold the antenna to
the transducer.

Henry



It depends on how you propagate it whether it is audio or RF.
If you are transmitting audio you are transmitting an acoustic wave.
If you are transmitting RF then you are transmitting an
electromagnetic wave.

You can have RF transmitted easily at 10 khz. You can also have audio
at 10 khz, as an example.

A depth sounder transmits audio. An acoustic wave.

Although you could use an RF signal generator to test a transducer, if
the signal generator went down that low. Most do not.

While most better audio generators go up to about .5 mhz. Probably
easier to find than an RF generator that covers that range.

Yes RB, you have it correct as how to hook it up to the coax.
50 to 200 khz range will probably be where you find them. There are a
few that go up to 400 khz.

If I remember right 50 was common, 80, 120 or 125, 180, 200.
50 and 200 were the most popular. I may be wrong on some of the other
frequencies. Maybe some more that I have forgotten too.

Regards
Gary
  #2   Report Post  
Henry
 
Posts: n/a
Default depth finder transducer frequency question


It depends on how you propagate it whether it is audio or RF.
If you are transmitting audio you are transmitting an acoustic wave.
If you are transmitting RF then you are transmitting an
electromagnetic wave.


Thank you, this makes sense.
I was trained in radio and perhaps was being too simplistic. Yes, I was not
differentiating between acoustic pressure waves and EM waves. I should study
the workings of the transducer. Can anyone help here?
Does a transducer have a diaphragm vibrating at 200K?

I must confess that my training started over 50 years ago (in the RAF). It
was much simpler then (fishfinder, what's that?), and I now feel rather left
behind.

Henry


  #3   Report Post  
Peter Bennett
 
Posts: n/a
Default depth finder transducer frequency question

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:52:31 GMT, "Henry" wrote:


It depends on how you propagate it whether it is audio or RF.
If you are transmitting audio you are transmitting an acoustic wave.
If you are transmitting RF then you are transmitting an
electromagnetic wave.


Thank you, this makes sense.
I was trained in radio and perhaps was being too simplistic. Yes, I was not
differentiating between acoustic pressure waves and EM waves. I should study
the workings of the transducer. Can anyone help here?
Does a transducer have a diaphragm vibrating at 200K?


Yes - actually, a piezoelectric crystal that vibrates at the operating
frequency.






--
Peter Bennett, VE7CEI
peterbb (at) interchange.ubc.ca
new newsgroup users info : http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq
GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter
Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca
  #4   Report Post  
Bruce in Alaska
 
Posts: n/a
Default depth finder transducer frequency question

In article .com,
Peter Bennett wrote:

Yes - actually, a piezoelectric crystal that vibrates at the operating
frequency.


True, actually 90% of the piezoelectric crystal tranducers are Barium
Titanate Crystals and most of these are made by one company. (I forget
the name now, but they OEM to all the Sounder producers) The 28Khz
Transducers are Magnetic Restriction types and not crystals, and the old
WWII SubSignal "Big Whoppers" were also Magnetic Restriction types as
well. It's really hard to get crystals to resonate below 50Khz with the
power levels used by typical sounders below that frequency.

Bruce in alaska
--
add a 2 before @
  #5   Report Post  
Figment
 
Posts: n/a
Default depth finder transducer frequency question

The early Seafarer (Flashing neon) sounders in the UK ran at 150kHz.


"Gary Schafer" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:53:39 GMT, "Henry" wrote:

A lot of talk here of audio signal generators.

Although depth sounders are referred to as "sonar" they do not work at

audio
frequencies.

Hi-Fi equipment can work up to 20K (salesmen and status-seekers will

clain
more)
This is the upper level for people with good hearing. By the time we can
afford boats and gadgets out hearing has deteriorated to much below this.

Modern depth sounders work at 200K. This is radio frequency.

Some years ago the most popular channel on BBC radio was on 200k. It

would
seem that, if you wish to test your fishfinder, you might be better off
using a thirty year old European broadcast receiver and hold the antenna

to
the transducer.

Henry



It depends on how you propagate it whether it is audio or RF.
If you are transmitting audio you are transmitting an acoustic wave.
If you are transmitting RF then you are transmitting an
electromagnetic wave.

You can have RF transmitted easily at 10 khz. You can also have audio
at 10 khz, as an example.

A depth sounder transmits audio. An acoustic wave.

Although you could use an RF signal generator to test a transducer, if
the signal generator went down that low. Most do not.

While most better audio generators go up to about .5 mhz. Probably
easier to find than an RF generator that covers that range.

Yes RB, you have it correct as how to hook it up to the coax.
50 to 200 khz range will probably be where you find them. There are a
few that go up to 400 khz.

If I remember right 50 was common, 80, 120 or 125, 180, 200.
50 and 200 were the most popular. I may be wrong on some of the other
frequencies. Maybe some more that I have forgotten too.

Regards
Gary





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eagle Depth Finder Transducer Problems Fred Reyes General 5 June 23rd 04 11:49 PM
Depth sounder transducer question Wethead Cruising 9 March 16th 04 11:17 PM
Replacing Lowrance depth finder butch burton General 5 October 16th 03 09:59 AM
Depth Finder - Two questions Gary Warner General 3 July 8th 03 12:01 AM
Depth Finder - Two questions Gary Warner Boat Building 3 July 8th 03 12:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017