Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"Charles Momsen" wrote in message ... "KLC Lewis" wrote in message ... "Charles Momsen" wrote in message ... "KLC Lewis" wrote in message ... "Charles Momsen" wrote in message ... So which war monger are you rooting for? Ron Paul. You're a liar. Really. Prove it. Ron Paul is not a war monger, you claim to support him as a war monger. You are an idiot. Plonk. |
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... So which war monger are you rooting for? Ron Paul. Ron Paul is not a war monger. You are an idiot. Sums it up nicely. |
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"Charles Momsen" wrote in message ... "KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... So which war monger are you rooting for? Ron Paul. Ron Paul is not a war monger. You are an idiot. Sums it up nicely. He couldn't stand it that you smacked him down so thoroughly in the "Obama promising to invade Pakistan" discussion. The liberal modus operandi involves three things: 1) remain ignorant of the facts as long as you can, 2) when someone points out the facts prove you are wrong then.. 3) yell LIAR or... 4) run away. -- Gregory Hall |
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... "Charles Momsen" wrote in message ... "KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... So which war monger are you rooting for? Ron Paul. Ron Paul is not a war monger. You are an idiot. Sums it up nicely. He couldn't stand it that you smacked him down so thoroughly in the "Obama promising to invade Pakistan" discussion. The liberal modus operandi involves three things: 1) remain ignorant of the facts as long as you can, 2) when someone points out the facts prove you are wrong then.. 3) yell LIAR or... 4) run away. -- Gregory Hall Actually it's "she," and I simply got tired of dealing with blatant obtuseness. The fact remains that Obama has exactly the same policy regarding Pakistan as McCain: IF terrorists are hiding in Pakistan; IF the Pakistani government refuses to pursue them; and IF we have "actionable intelligence" which gives us reason to belive we know where they are and that a strike against them would be successful, we should act. Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade" Pakistan, you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best. And to state that Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving out the fact that his position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and deceitful. In short, it is a lie. Just another "liberal" Ron Paul supporter. Karin |
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"KLC Lewis" wrote in message ... "Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... "Charles Momsen" wrote in message ... "KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... So which war monger are you rooting for? Ron Paul. Ron Paul is not a war monger. You are an idiot. Sums it up nicely. He couldn't stand it that you smacked him down so thoroughly in the "Obama promising to invade Pakistan" discussion. The liberal modus operandi involves three things: 1) remain ignorant of the facts as long as you can, 2) when someone points out the facts prove you are wrong then.. 3) yell LIAR or... 4) run away. -- Gregory Hall Actually it's "she," and I simply got tired of dealing with blatant obtuseness. The fact remains that Obama has exactly the same policy regarding Pakistan as McCain: IF terrorists are hiding in Pakistan; IF the Pakistani government refuses to pursue them; and IF we have "actionable intelligence" which gives us reason to belive we know where they are and that a strike against them would be successful, we should act. Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade" Pakistan, you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best. And to state that Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving out the fact that his position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and deceitful. In short, it is a lie. Should have know he was dealing with a female . . . My bad! Extend your logic a little further, Sweetie, and you will see how absurd your argument really is. You contend it is a lie to leave out information that does not include McCain's stance so let's run with that. I can then say YOU are a liar because you left out the stances of Gloria La Riva, Chuck Baldwin, Gene Amondson, Bob Barr, Thomas Stevens, James, Harris, Cynthia McKinney, Alan Keyes, Ralph Nader, Brian Moore and Charles Jay who are ALL running for President of the United States and are on the ballot at this time. Just another "liberal" Ron Paul supporter. Karin Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . . Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain. -- Gregory Hall |
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . . And? Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain. -- Gregory Hall There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin would become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word, "nuclear." Had McCain chosen a running mate who is qualified to serve as president, I might have considered voting for him. As it stands, however, no. Just another insane liberal Ron Paul supporter, Karin |
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... "Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . . And? Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain. -- Gregory Hall There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin would become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word, "nuclear." Too late! Bush couldn't say it right either. ;-) But, you don't really think any president could create a theocracy do you? That means you'd rather have a man who CAN and WILL TRY to turn the country into a socialist country over a woman who could not turn the country into a theocracy? See what I mean about female logic? It's just not logical. Had McCain chosen a running mate who is qualified to serve as president, I might have considered voting for him. As it stands, however, no. Palin is more qualified than Obama by virtue of her greater executive experience. He has NONE she has years of it. Your ONLY choice is between your unfounded fears of what you irrationally fear Palin *might* do IF or what Obama SAYs he will do IF. You're supporting a Marxist by not supporting McCain/Palin. It's that simple. You are unpatriotic. -- Gregory Hall |
#8
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"WaIIy" wrote in message
... On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:57:19 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: "Gregory Hall" wrote in message ... Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . . And? Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain. -- Gregory Hall There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin would become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word, "nuclear." You really want a limp wrist on the button? If Obama croaks, Biden's brain is a ticking time bomb. Biden refuses to release his brain scans. Hmmmm Fortunately, Gov. Palin has released her complete medical records. NOT However, she did release her brain scans: http://www.nothingisthere.com/ -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#9
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"KLC Lewis" wrote in message ... Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade" Pakistan, you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best. And to state that Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving out the fact that his position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and deceitful. In short, it is a lie. If I point out that a certain tomato on the vine is yellow (and it is), is it then a lie because I didn't point out the tomato on the other vine is green? The deceit lay wholly within yourself. You are making unstated assumptions about another person's reasoning that seriously impair your ability to engage in any form of rational discussion. For the record I'm a Ron Paul supporter and have been so since he was first elected to office and voted for him when he first ran for president decades ago. Now who is duplicitous? |
#10
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Australia and Obama
"Charles Momsen" wrote in message ... "KLC Lewis" wrote in message ... Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade" Pakistan, you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best. And to state that Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving out the fact that his position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and deceitful. In short, it is a lie. If I point out that a certain tomato on the vine is yellow (and it is), is it then a lie because I didn't point out the tomato on the other vine is green? The deceit lay wholly within yourself. You are making unstated assumptions about another person's reasoning that seriously impair your ability to engage in any form of rational discussion. For the record I'm a Ron Paul supporter and have been so since he was first elected to office and voted for him when he first ran for president decades ago. Now who is duplicitous? Ouch! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wisconsin: Better than Australia! | ASA | |||
They have brains in Australia | ASA | |||
Did Australia move ? | ASA | |||
Australia Day! | ASA | |||
Want to go to Australia - Be Gay! | ASA |