Dave wrote:

First, the description of GLB is totally inaccurate. Second, you haven't
explained how GLB is responsible for the current mortgage-related
securities problems.

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
precis this bill for us?

Cheers
Marty

"Marty" wrote in message
news
Dave wrote:

First, the description of GLB is totally inaccurate. Second, you haven't
explained how GLB is responsible for the current mortgage-related
securities problems.

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
precis this bill for us?

Cheers
Marty


Yes. He advises regulators, so perhaps he's got a few skeletons in the
closet about the mess.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty wrote:

Dave wrote:

First, the description of GLB is totally inaccurate. Second, you
haven't explained how GLB is responsible for the current
mortgage-related securities problems.

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
precis this bill for us?

what's that sound?
oh yeah...it's a deafening silence...
seemed like such a simple question too...
pity...

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty said:

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
precis this bill for us?

In the US, we call something that hasn't yet been passed by Congress and
"bill" and something that has been passed and signed into law a "law."

Much too long and complicated for an even half complete summary. GLB,
which
was passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Clinton in
1999, made some significant changes in the ways our financial institutions
may be structured. Among other things it made it somewhat easier for banks
that were well capitalized (or more accurately their holding companies) to
compete in areas outside the traditional financial services area, such as
brokerage and insurance. Generally bank holding companies were allowed to
enter these areas by becoming a "financial holding company" to own both
the
bank and separate corporations conducting these other businesses. However,
it generally left unchanged the kinds of things banks could invest in
directly.


Huh??? The Congress (both houses!) was controlled by Republicans from 1995
until recently. Sounds like revisionist history to me.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
ons...
: "Dave" wrote in message
: ...
: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty said:
:
: Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
: precis this bill for us?
:
: In the US, we call something that hasn't yet been passed by Congress and
: "bill" and something that has been passed and signed into law a "law."
:
: Much too long and complicated for an even half complete summary. GLB,
: which
: was passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Clinton in
: 1999, made some significant changes in the ways our financial
institutions
: may be structured. Among other things it made it somewhat easier for
banks
: that were well capitalized (or more accurately their holding companies)
to
: compete in areas outside the traditional financial services area, such
as
: brokerage and insurance. Generally bank holding companies were allowed
to
: enter these areas by becoming a "financial holding company" to own both
: the
: bank and separate corporations conducting these other businesses.
However,
: it generally left unchanged the kinds of things banks could invest in
: directly.
:
:
: Huh??? The Congress (both houses!) was controlled by Republicans from 1995
: until recently. Sounds like revisionist history to me.


Revisionist history? Is that like having Google delete all those posts you
made to alt.drugs and then acting like they never existed?

PKB!!!!

--
Gregory Hall

On Sep 19, 11:35*am, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty said:

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
precis this bill for us?
....
Much too long and complicated for an even half complete summary. GLB, which
was passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Clinton in
1999...

What Democrat controlled Congress?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/105th_U...tates_Congress.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/106th_Congress
Facts have a well known liberal bias. And, just for fun:
http://www.slate.com/id/2199810/

-- Tom.

But the economy is in great shape! Don't forget that "fact."

wrote in message
...
On Sep 19, 11:35 am, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty said:

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
precis this bill for us?
....
Much too long and complicated for an even half complete summary. GLB,
which
was passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Clinton in
1999...

What Democrat controlled Congress?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/105th_U...tates_Congress.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/106th_Congress
Facts have a well known liberal bias. And, just for fun:
http://www.slate.com/id/2199810/

-- Tom.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Dave wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty said:

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as to
precis this bill for us?

In the US, we call something that hasn't yet been passed by Congress and
"bill" and something that has been passed and signed into law a "law."

Much too long and complicated for an even half complete summary. GLB, which
was passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Clinton in
1999,


Hmmm, that would be the 106th Congress, Republican Majority, Newt
Gingrich the speaker, Thurmond President pro tempore of the Senate,
(same Congress that impeached Clinton, I thought you'd remember that!).
So having got that basic fact wrong, why should I trust the rest of
your summary?

Cheers
Martin

Marty wrote:
Dave wrote:

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty said:

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as
to precis this bill for us?


In the US, we call something that hasn't yet been passed by Congress and
"bill" and something that has been passed and signed into law a "law."

Much too long and complicated for an even half complete summary. GLB,
which
was passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Clinton in
1999,



Hmmm, that would be the 106th Congress, Republican Majority, Newt
Gingrich the speaker, Thurmond President pro tempore of the Senate,
(same Congress that impeached Clinton, I thought you'd remember that!).
So having got that basic fact wrong, why should I trust the rest of
your summary?

Cheers
Martin


Except that Clinton wasn't impeached...

He was TRIED.

And aquitted.


--

Richard

(remove the X to email)

"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
...
Marty wrote:
Dave wrote:

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:25:00 -0400, Marty said:

Well Dave, since you are our resident expert, could you be so kind as
to precis this bill for us?


In the US, we call something that hasn't yet been passed by Congress and
"bill" and something that has been passed and signed into law a "law."

Much too long and complicated for an even half complete summary. GLB,
which
was passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by Clinton in
1999,



Hmmm, that would be the 106th Congress, Republican Majority, Newt
Gingrich the speaker, Thurmond President pro tempore of the Senate, (same
Congress that impeached Clinton, I thought you'd remember that!). So
having got that basic fact wrong, why should I trust the rest of your
summary?

Cheers
Martin


Except that Clinton wasn't impeached...

He was TRIED.

And aquitted.


--

Richard

(remove the X to email)


He was impeached by the House and acquited by the Senate.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com