![]() |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
|
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
Roger implies the limits of ***function**** of headsail furlers.
A headsail on a 'furler' can only be reduced by 30% SA and still retain any good shape. Beyond 30% reduction and you wind up with a 'BAG" shape instead of a usable sail shape for any 'upwind' work. 135 X .70 = 95% So, you can reduce a 135 down to a 'working jib' (100%) size without shape problems. A 150 can usually only be reduced to a 105, etc. A furler usually cannot tolerate heavy luff loads, as would be necessary to change the luff entry shape (the 'forward curve shape' at the luff) of a jib/genoa; crank on luff tension to a furler with a halyard and to *Jam*. ..... probably the prime reason that you'll never ever see a genoa/jib furler on a serious racing boat. My impression is that most 'kroozers' dont know (or care) how to 'shape' sails ... as one hardly ever sees a 'kroozer' without a furler. So Roger, put your working jib back on board when travelling as your can roll that puppy down to a 70% sail. Same arguments apply to mainsail furlers - sail shape. |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
On 2008-08-11 00:51:51 -0400, RichH said:
A furler usually cannot tolerate heavy luff loads Excuse me? It's been years since any "modern" furler design failed for merely luff loads. The strains on a furler decrease dramatically as the sail is furled. Even the baggiest furled-size 110 won't strain a foil nearly as much as a real 110. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
"RichH" wrote
A furler usually cannot tolerate heavy luff loads, as would be necessary to change the luff entry shape (the 'forward curve shape' at the luff) of a jib/genoa; crank on luff tension to a furler with a halyard and to *Jam*. ..... probably the prime reason that you'll never ever see a genoa/jib furler on a serious racing boat. This somewhat depends on halyard geometry. You see some setups where the halyard leads at an angle from the foil. This is good for minimizing halyard wraps but pulls the end of the foil against the stay. My halyard is pretty much in line with the stay but short so no wrap problems or strain. I get pretty good halyard tension with my rather unusual jib halyard arrangement. The halyard cleat is on a track with a strong tackle that hauls it down the mast and the fall led back to the cockpit. I had not trouble rolling with good tension last year. The sailmaker recommended that I release the tension on my new sail before stowing to preserve the shape so this arrangment has proven quite convienient. I occasionally forget to de-tension the halyard and have not noticed any difference in furling force. I did work a good gop of Teflon grease down into the end of the foil before putting the rig up this year and have my foil adjusted so the end runs on the terminal swage sleeve. So Roger, put your working jib back on board when travelling as your can roll that puppy down to a 70% sail. The shape of my new Genoa is pretty good at about 70% size. I had luff foam put in which I'm told has gone out of style but does seem to do a good job of increasing the amount that can be rolled up. I will probably switch to the working jib if knowingly facing a long beat in 25 knot plus conditions but I wouldn't make the switch just for traveling. With the third reef I had put in the main and a touch of power, I should be able to handle anything with the 135% that is likely to come up unexpectedly. BTW I had a dock neighbor very interested in my fuel system yesterday. He takes fishing parties out so is one of the few people still using much fuel. He said that so few people are buying fuel that lots of people are getting poor fuel because the long hoses are sitting out in the sun for much longer periods. The fuel polisher in Portland evidently is no longer in business this year. -- Roger Long |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
On 10 Aug 2008 20:18:03 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:51:34 -0400, said: When the wind suddenly pipes up, my 170% genoa can be a bear to wind up. That's where heavy gloves come in handy. You carry a 170 furler? And I thought I was maybe overdoing it with a 150. I would never have gone out and bought one. It came with the boat, and I don't use it that often. As I pointed out, here in the LIS, the wind sometimes whispers at 3-5 knots for hours and then suddenly jumps to 15 without much warning. You don't always get an opportunity to "reef early". Unless I'm anticipating a long sail in very light conditions, it usually stays at home, and I don't even keep it onboard. I have a pretty nice 155%, so it's really not worth the extra weight or storage space. |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
On 2008-08-11 09:57:02 -0400, Dave said:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:51 -0700 (PDT), RichH said: A headsail on a 'furler' can only be reduced by 30% SA and still retain any good shape. Beyond 30% reduction and you wind up with a 'BAG" shape instead of a usable sail shape for any 'upwind' work. 135 X .70 = 95% So, you can reduce a 135 down to a 'working jib' (100%) size without shape problems. A 150 can usually only be reduced to a 105, et That's consistent with what I've experienced. I generally end up taking a second reef in the main before rolling any of the 150 in. On any masthead rig, that's the way to go. The foresail is more efficient than the main. Additionally, when properly reefed, the main gets flatter (less heel and weather helm) and more efficient, with less drag. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
This somewhat depends on halyard geometry. *You see some setups where the halyard leads at an angle from the foil. *This is good for minimizing halyard wraps but pulls the end of the foil against the stay. ........ *******Not talking about lead angles of the top swivel to halyard sheeve.... but the deflection of the torlon bealls under extreme compressive load from extreme halyard tension; hence, the tendency to begin to jam or add a lot of friction. My recent Harken starts to jam when at extreme halyard loads. But then again 'kroozers' have no idea that it takes halyard strain to 'shape' a sail so its probably a non-issue for those who simply 'just raise' a sail. I release the tension on my new sail ********Damn good idea as 'creep' (permanent elastic deformation) is what eventually 'kills' the shape of a sail. I had luff foam put in which I'm told has gone out of style but does seem to do a good job of increasing the amount that can be rolled up. * I will probably switch to the working jib if knowingly facing a long beat in 25 knot plus conditions but I wouldn't make the switch just for traveling. *With the third reef I had put in the main and a touch of power, I should be able to handle anything with the 135% that is likely to come up unexpectedly. ******* The newer modern cutting programs (with "S" curve luff hollow profiles) have mostly obsoleted the need for foam luffs ... although on a BIG sail you still sometimes need a wee bit of foam luff to 'help' the partly furled shape - still 30% reduction is about as good as it gets; and, that assumes that one knows how to set the correct backstay/headstay tension to match the actual 'luff hollow' that is cut into the headsail when its fully wind-loaded BTW I had a dock neighbor very interested in my fuel system yesterday. *He takes fishing parties out so is one of the few people still using much fuel. He said that so few people are buying fuel that lots of people are getting poor fuel because the long hoses are sitting out in the sun for much longer periods. *The fuel polisher in Portland evidently is no longer in business this year. Yup, the higher hose temps are good breeding grounds for those fungals that thrive in #2. Those 'filters' on the delivery hoses do nothing to stop the 'spores' and 'buds' of the fungals/bacteria. The filters there are mostly for 'rocks, sticks and feathers'. If possible, I only buy fuel from a marina as the very last resort; Id rather 'jug it' from a truck stop as the chances of fresh uncontaminated fuel is much much less. :-) |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
On 2008-08-11 06:17:56 -0400, "Roger Long" said:
"RichH" wrote A furler usually cannot tolerate heavy luff loads, as would be necessary to change the luff entry shape (the 'forward curve shape' at the luff) of a jib/genoa; crank on luff tension to a furler with a halyard and to *Jam*. ..... probably the prime reason that you'll never ever see a genoa/jib furler on a serious racing boat. This somewhat depends on halyard geometry. You see some setups where the halyard leads at an angle from the foil. This is good for minimizing halyard wraps but pulls the end of the foil against the stay. Oh, good point! I forgot another reason I love the CDI: The halyard is internal to the luff, so no possibility of halyard wrap. The luff tension is controlled at the foot, with about 6:1 leverage from the multiple loops of light line and gravity helping rather than hurting. It's real easy to over-tension the luff with a CDI, particularly as the halyard is wire. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
In article ,
Dave wrote: On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:51 -0700 (PDT), RichH said: A headsail on a 'furler' can only be reduced by 30% SA and still retain any good shape. Beyond 30% reduction and you wind up with a 'BAG" shape instead of a usable sail shape for any 'upwind' work. 135 X .70 = 95% So, you can reduce a 135 down to a 'working jib' (100%) size without shape problems. A 150 can usually only be reduced to a 105, et That's consistent with what I've experienced. I generally end up taking a second reef in the main before rolling any of the 150 in. Doesn't that give you a fairly unbalanced helm? That's a lot of CE forward. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com