Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 10, 1:36 pm, RichH wrote:
.... once 300 series stainless gets loaded above its endurance limit it typicallly only lasts approx 1 million load cycles - doesnt matter if its rigging, keelbolts, chainplates. If the endurance load factor (at about 30kpsi) is exceeded, 1 million cycles is about all you get... At stresses less than that the bolts will essentially never fatigue, right? I'm looking at a worked example of an ABS keel bolt worksheet. Since you're using psi I'm converting to USA units. 10 keel bolts of 0.83" (at the thread root) support a 7,175 lb keel with a cg 2' below the joint. Even assuming half the bolts aren't doing anything the maximum static stress on those bolts are going to be an order of magnitude below their endurance load. Hydrodynamic loads on the keel max out at about the same order. Day in and day out you'll never approach the endurance limit of ABS sized bolts. On top of that your typical designer is going to use the next size up off the shelf rod. As you'd expect with those kind of scantlings keel bolt failure is extremely rare. Fatigue isn't normally an issue. ... That sailboats constantly have to have rigging replaced, on some - keels & rudder shafts, etc. keep falling off ... would tell any prudent engineer/designer that 'something is wrong' in the 'typical design'. Rigging is a different story with very different compromises. Keel failure is so rare that I think each case needs to be looked at individually. There is no evident systemic problem with keel bolts as a class. -- Tom. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Words of Wisdom from Andy Rooney | ASA | |||
Wisdom and Truth | ASA | |||
Difference between OMC conventional outboard and the seadrive | General | |||
Bob's Gems of Sailing Wisdom | ASA |