Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
Nope, I'm not going to do the worship business here. I'll accept 100%
your account of the incident except for the implied analysis. So you diverted 480 nm to get to this sailboat. Now what would you have done using that fuel and time if not for this diversion? Oh, yeah, also you hung around until the weather calmed. So we have a diversion of about 500 nm, then a delay while you waited the weather out. Let me ask you, if the sailboat was in such dire distress, why could it survive the storm? Why do you say that the family would have been in mourning if you didn't pull the guy out when the storm passed? You mean, he and the boat could survive heavy weather but not calm weather? More to the point, is your existence in standard patrol or whatever you were on when you 'diverted' the 500 nm useless? Do you serve no function at all except to aimlessly cruise around in your cutter just waiting for some clown to falsely claim being in distress so you can zoon 500 nm to make some headlines and get good press? So now tell me, what didn't get done while you were out watching this sailboat bounce around in demonstrably safe conditions? I say safe because it DID make it through didn't it? So the safety isn't speculative, but demonstrated. |
#12
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
Paul Cassel wrote:
hpeer wrote: Paul, The USCG is the ONLY military organization with a full time peace time mission. Except for NOAA. So if you are going to bash the USCG Show me one area where I 'bashed' anybody. I only said the rescue wasn't free in the sense of lacking any marginal costs. "More to the point, is your existence in standard patrol or whatever you were on when you 'diverted' the 500 nm useless? Do you serve no function at all except to aimlessly cruise around in your cutter just waiting for some clown to falsely claim being in distress so you can zoon 500 nm to make some headlines and get good press? So now tell me, what didn't get done while you were out watching this sailboat bounce around in demonstrably safe conditions? I say safe because it DID make it through didn't it? So the safety isn't speculative, but demonstrated. " Sorry Paul, it sounds like "bashing to me." If it were not intended so then I guess we agree. The rescue was most certainly NOT free. Howard |
#13
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
I'm sure there are many in the Coast Guard who I would consider it an
honor to take out to dinner but: my experience is being on a rented 14 foot fishing boat with a dead motor approximately 1 mile west of the Santa Cruz Pier, CA around 2:30pm PST. A Coast Guard Cutter past within 1/4 mile of us going into Santa Cruz and ignored our flares. If a sailboat anchored by the pier hadn't responded to our smoke only god knows how long we'd be out there. He was a cruiser just working his way down the coast. Now if I were a Kennedy I'm sure congress would make sure the Navy was there for me. :-) On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:59:51 -0800 (PST), wrote: I have to say this discussion is both hilarious and offensive. Especially when a certain someone posts that the US Coast Guard would have been "on leave or sitting around shining our shoes" had this case not have happened. ................ .................................................. .. Respectfully, A United States Coast Guard Cutterman currently serving aboard CGC TAHOMA |
#14
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
hpeer wrote:
Paul, The USCG is the ONLY military organization with a full time peace time mission. Except for NOAA. So if you are going to bash the USCG Show me one area where I 'bashed' anybody. I only said the rescue wasn't free in the sense of lacking any marginal costs. |
#15
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
hpeer wrote:
The USCG is the ONLY military organization with a full time peace time mission. Except for NOAA. NOAA is not a military organization. But to be honest the USCG is not really a military organization, Huh? Funny, they have pretty big guns up front on their boats for not being military. That's kinda like saying the National Guard isn't really military because it also has a peacetime function. The point is that all big organizations are relatively ineffective and inefficient. Within all military organizations as well as all government departments and organizations at all levels (federal, state, and usually local as well) there is usually massive waste and inefficiencies. To be fair there has been tremendous improvement over the last twenty years or so in the military and at the same time the civilian side has become much, much worse. But as was pointed out by someone else, one mandate still stands in all government departments and organizations - they are usually ordered by their department heads to spend everything they get and then some, or the following year's budget will go down. Even the lower ranks feel this pressure at the end of the fiscal year. Oh and one more thing, if the Coast Guard or any military unit does not constantly practice, their skills and leadership will atrophy. The SAR mission in question can easily be considered practice as well as a real mission. Denying them those opportunities threatens their budget, skills, and mission. Then what will you have left after a few self-serving Congressmen decide they want the money for their own districts instead of giving it to fund CG ops? Just trying to clarify a few things. Red Hope everone had, or is having great holidays whatever they may be. |
#16
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
Red wrote:
hpeer wrote: The USCG is the ONLY military organization with a full time peace time mission. Except for NOAA. NOAA is not a military organization. Think again: http://www.noaacorps.noaa.gov/index.html |
#17
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
Red wrote:
hpeer wrote: The USCG is the ONLY military organization with a full time peace time mission. Except for NOAA. NOAA is not a military organization. And jeff replied: Think again: http://www.noaacorps.noaa.gov/index.html Think again jeff; This is copied from the site above. The NOAA Commissioned Officer uniformed services of the United States. The service, consisting of approximately 299 commissioned officers,is an integral part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. (Let's repeat that last statement... "an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce") The Director of the NOAA Corps is Rear Admiral Jonathan W. Bailey, NOAA. He is also the Director of the Office of Marine and Aviation Operations (OMAO) which operates a wide variety of specialized aircraft and ships to conduct NOAA's environmental and scientific missions. The NOAA Commissioned Corps traces its roots back to the former U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, which dates back to 1807 and President Thomas Jefferson. The NOAA Corps today provides a cadre of professionals trained in engineering, earth sciences, oceanography, meteorology, fisheries science, and other related disciplines. Officers operate ships, fly aircraft, manage research projects, conduct diving operations, and serve in staff positions throughout NOAA. Red BTW, I worked for NOAA and I was not in any military organization at that time. The officers are uniformed, just as is the top U.S. M.D. and many other civilian/government positions. NOAA officers do not take the military oath. |
#18
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
Red wrote:
Red wrote: hpeer wrote: The USCG is the ONLY military organization with a full time peace time mission. Except for NOAA. NOAA is not a military organization. And jeff replied: Think again: http://www.noaacorps.noaa.gov/index.html Think again jeff; This is copied from the site above. The NOAA Commissioned Officer uniformed services of the United States. The service, consisting of approximately 299 commissioned officers,is an integral part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. (Let's repeat that last statement... "an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce") So an agency of the Department of the Treasury (until recently) is clearly military but and agency of Commerce is not? That's a pretty lame argument - try again. The Director of the NOAA Corps is Rear Admiral Jonathan W. Bailey, NOAA. He is also the Director of the Office of Marine and Aviation Operations (OMAO) which operates a wide variety of specialized aircraft and ships to conduct NOAA's environmental and scientific missions. The NOAA Commissioned Corps traces its roots back to the former U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, which dates back to 1807 and President Thomas Jefferson. The NOAA Corps today provides a cadre of professionals trained in engineering, earth sciences, oceanography, meteorology, fisheries science, and other related disciplines. Officers operate ships, fly aircraft, manage research projects, conduct diving operations, and serve in staff positions throughout NOAA. Red BTW, I worked for NOAA and I was not in any military organization at that time. The officers are uniformed, just as is the top U.S. M.D. and many other civilian/government positions. NOAA officers do not take the military oath. Oh really? I believe that the officers of the NOAA Corps take the same oath as officers in branches under the Department of Defense. In fact, all sorts of federal employees take the same oath as directly by 5 U.S.C. 3331. I took the oath (I think) when I worked at the Smithsonian, and even postal workers take it. Curiously, enlisted men take a different oath, where they agree to obey orders. Officers (and Postmen) don't agree to follow orders, only uphold the Constitution. Here's the law: An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law. BTW, if you're looking for a real significant difference, the NOAA Corps are not bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice unless they are attached to a military unit. Of course, that can happen pretty easily. |
#19
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
I will only say that:
1. If the CG wasn't actually doing the rescue operation they would be puttering around in an exercise which is based upon a "rescue operation" or maybe something more exciting like "drug/terrorist interdiction". 2. Total cost to the taxpayers is the same either way. |
#20
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Let's Clarify a few things
hpeer wrote:
"More to the point, is your existence in standard patrol or whatever you were on when you 'diverted' the 500 nm useless? Do you serve no function at all except to aimlessly cruise around in your cutter just waiting for some clown to falsely claim being in distress so you can zoon 500 nm to make some headlines and get good press? So now tell me, what didn't get done while you were out watching this sailboat bounce around in demonstrably safe conditions? I say safe because it DID make it through didn't it? So the safety isn't speculative, but demonstrated. " Sorry Paul, it sounds like "bashing to me." If it were not intended so then I guess we agree. The rescue was most certainly NOT free. Howard I did note that you didn't say what didn't get done while you went out to do this rescue which, I infer, took a few days. If I or my wife could spend several days away from our jobs with nothing changed due to our absence (at regular intervals and w/o notice) I think our employers would wonder what are there doing all day. -paul |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Things I Don't Like.... | ASA | |||
a few things | Whitewater | |||
Reagan, Cars, and Trees -- PLEASE Clarify | General | |||
Things you just can't do without! | General |