On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:52:37 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote:

On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:43:23 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote:

On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 01:36:19 GMT, Brian Whatcott
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:58:48 -0500, Jim wrote:

Gordon wrote:
Researching anchors and keep popping up testimonials on how absolutely
great the new Rocnas are! Always set the first time, never drag in any
bottom, yada, yada.
Then I realized why! They size them twice the size of other anchors!
My boat calls for a 15 kg Bruce for 60 knot winds.
A 35# CQR. (16 kg) and
A whopping 33 kg for Rocna!

So does this mean the Rocna design is so lousy it takes twice the
weight to work properly?

Gordon
And for anyone looking for the Manson,


http://www.azuremarine.com/e1en/grou...on.asp#supreme

They seem to have better prices than West.

Jim.

I think it has already been mentioned. The Azure URL (above) notes:

"The Manson Supreme has been reviewed by Lloyds Register of Shipping
and has received a SHHP status. The first and only production boat
anchor in the world to do so."

Brian Whatcott Altus OK


Not to start an argument but where did you find that information? I've
been looking for that kind of data all over the Net. Even e-mailed
Lloyd's but no answer.

(hit return too quickly)

I did look at the URL, above, and in one place it states that the
anchor has received Lloyd's certificate but in another place it says
that the test is being conducted.

First statement
The Manson Supreme has been reviewed by Lloyds Register of Shipping
and has received a SHHP status. The first and only production boat
anchor in the world to do so.

Second statement
The anchor is currently being surveyed by Lloyds Register of Shipping
and will be certified as a Super High Holding Power Anchor, the first
production anchor in the world to receive this status & certification.

Bruce-in-Bangkok

Careless editing of web updates?

Brian W