"Brian Whatcott" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:35:08 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote:


The Azure URL (above) notes:
"The Manson Supreme has been reviewed by Lloyds Register of Shipping
and has received a SHHP status. The first and only production boat
anchor in the world to do so."

Brian Whatcott Altus OK
-
-
Not to start an argument but where did you find that information?
...
Bruce-in-Bangkok
-
My note read like this, Bruce:
"The Azure URL (above) notes [ it ]"

Brian Whatcott Altus OK
...

I did look at the URL, above, and in one place it states that the
anchor has received Lloyd's certificate but in another place it says
that the test is being conducted.

First statement
The Manson Supreme has been reviewed by Lloyds Register of Shipping
and has received a SHHP status. The first and only production boat
anchor in the world to do so.

Second statement
The anchor is currently being surveyed by Lloyds Register of Shipping
and will be certified as a Super High Holding Power Anchor, the first
production anchor in the world to receive this status & certification.

Thus my question.

Bruce-in-Bangkok

I have a private note in hand that appears to confirm the maker's
contention that The Mason Supreme is the only SHHP Lloyds-rated
device at present.

I also hear that the Rocna anchor in debate is made by sub-contract
suppliers, that vendor having no production capability in-house at
present. (not that this is particularly damning, I wouldn't think?).

Brian Whatcott Altus OK

Are the sub-contractors qualified to an approved quality assurance standard?
Do they have an approved inspection and test plan? Who does the quality
control during fabrication?
What method is used to inspect the welding and the purchased steel? It is
not uncommon to see burned through welds and treated steel that exceeds
hardness specifications (Rockwell or Vickers scale)