Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, Joe, that certainly establishes you as our resident filter expert. I
believe you 100%. Now that it's clear that we are having an informed and intelligent discussion, let me get more precise and specific to my situation. "Joe" wrote A vortex is made in the bowl that helps seperate the water from the fuel. This is clear from the design of the filter housing. The key word in your statement is "helps". The issue is how much the help is. If it is 80% - 90%, you could say that the separator is essentially worthless at low flow rates. If it is something like 10% it is not going to be critical in most applications were simple gravity driven separation will do a lot of the work. Running crew boats with their notoriously wet fuel (that I've heard about from others), wringing maximum performance out of the filters could be a significant operational consideration. At best, you might still be wishing the filters were doing a better job. That last 10% of performance might be quite noticable. I saw no hint of water or other contamination for two seasons. Considering how little attention most boaters up here pay to the subject (just saying, "do whatever it need" to the yard once a year), and how few I see being towed in, it's probably typical for this climate and fuel infrastructure. When I look at the smallest filter housing, I see that it is rated for 15 GPH. Scaling it down to preserve the same flow dynamics at the less than 1 GPH I'm usually drawing would make it so small that the filter wouldn't last long. It would have to be a completely different design, a swirl separator, a separate chamber for water to collect, and a larger filter housing. I'm not likely to get "swirl boost" out of stock Racors anyway at flow rates less than 1/15 th of maximum. The simple gravity separation will be more effective in a larger volume and slower flow, that's why some vessels use day and even separator tanks. A larger filter will last longer. That's why I don't see a downside to larger filters in my fairly common situation. For a crewboat, or a yacht picking up lots of third world fuel in a similar climate, no doubt in my mind that you are spot on about the proper sizing. The jury is out for me on additives. A yard manager with a lot of credibility told me not to put anything in my fuel so I didn't for two years. Then, I had just a few hiccups in an otherwise smooth running engine with a nearly empty tank and began to find alge in the filter bowl. I put in the StarTon and the bowl filled up with green stuff and the filter turned green black although the engine ran fine. One tank of fuel after the filter change, the bowl is clear. It certainly looks as if stuff was flushed out of the tank that would otherwise be building up. Keeping it moving through to the filter in smaller amounts instead of building up so that a big glob gets sucked up in rough seas, which is when it invariably happens, seems like a good idea. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need picture of fuel jet and fuel filter location | General | |||
Cant get fuel pump to prime after changing fuel filter | General | |||
Fuel Filter | General | |||
Fuel Filter | Boat Building | |||
Oil filter vs fuel filter? | General |