Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , egordon873
@aol.com says... http://www.eskimo.com/~mighetto/p11.htm Myth#11 Mac26 is not for ocean sailing. Go ahead, click the link and see just how good and seaworthy a professional captain thinks the Mac really is. Dare you. Jeff expecially. Wow gee whiz. I didn't read all the guff - what a god awful website. I did find this though... http://www.ne-ts.com/ar/ar-407capsize.html My own comments on a Mac 26X - which I tried out (a new one) two years ago. Is it a sailing boat or a speedboat? My biggest gripe, for a brand new boat, is that it is beaten on the water (sailing) by boats that are 25 years old (eg Farr 7.5, Noelex 25). (I bought a Farr 7.5 in the end, BTW). I was pleasantly surprised by it's pointing ability, but again much older boats out point it (as probably expected given it's 'cross nature' design). And is it a speedboat? No, no way. It's good to have the motor to get out of trouble (before the weather hits) quickly. But *in* the heavier stuff, presumably you have the ballast in place, so a reduced speed, and would be going much slower than that anyway given it's hull design in rough sea. The price is good, and the cabin is spacious in feel. I like that. The rigging looks and feels *way* too light for my liking - however I note of few reports of breakages - so I supose that's good. The whole rudder assembly likewise seems too light in construction. Overall I think the Mac retains it's - it's neither this, and it's neither that - label, sorry. -- Duncan |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:31:54 +1200, Duncan McC (NZ)
wrote: My own comments on a Mac 26X - which I tried out (a new one) two years ago. Is it a sailing boat or a speedboat? My biggest gripe, for a brand new boat, is that it is beaten on the water (sailing) by boats that are 25 years old (eg Farr 7.5, Noelex 25). (I bought a Farr 7.5 in the end, BTW). I was pleasantly surprised by it's pointing ability, but again much older boats out point it (as probably expected given it's 'cross nature' design). I couldn't find any Farr 7.5's for sale in the U.S., but maybe they come on market sometimes. Do they still make them? Looks like a nice boat. Probably not many made the trip to the U.S. There was a long thread in the Mac forum where an Aussie went through contortions having a Mac 26X shipped there. Shipping container prices, fumigation, trailer rules/modifications, etc. Ended costing him quite a bit. I couldn't quite figure why he would do it. Then another Aussie mentioned the outrageous price asked for the Mac there (60k AUS for the X, 70k AUS for the M) and said that despite his costs he will come out ahead should he decide to sell it off. He is himself arranging an import. The X and M are almost identical, with the M being the newer version. A new M in the U.S. will cost maybe 30-34K U.S. tricked out with a 4-stroke 50HP and other common add-ons. I think the bare boat itself with trailer and just a mainsail is 20-24K U.S. Apparently trade between the U.S. and Oz/NZ is well restricted between distance and regs. One of my sons recently sold his Chicago based Bayliner powerboat for an attractive price (he wanted a quick sale) to an Aussie working in Indiana. The fellow told my son he would be sending the boat off for sale in Australia and pocket 10k U.S. on the deal. All very strange. Another of my sons now resides in Sydney and tells me there are similar price anomalies with some U.S. cars, where older models not given a second look here (Ford Taurus, eg) sell for seemingly large sums in Australia. If I had more energy I might look into U.S./Oz import/export business. The price is good, and the cabin is spacious in feel. I like that. Pretty scary you would say the price is good for a Mac 26 in Oz/NZ, given what I've heard. Were you looking there or in the U.S.? Agree on the Mac 26 cabin. The spartan nature gives it a less claustrophobic feel than similar sized boats. But some will see that lack of cabinetry as inadequate stowage. --Vic |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vic Smith wrote in
: I couldn't find any Farr 7.5's for sale in the U.S., but maybe they come on market sometimes. Do they still make them? Looks like a nice boat. Probably not many made the trip to the U.S. There was a long thread in the Mac forum where an Aussie went through contortions having a Mac 26X shipped there. Shipping container prices, fumigation, trailer rules/modifications, etc. Ended costing him quite a bit. I couldn't quite figure why he would do it. Then another Aussie mentioned the outrageous price asked for the Mac there (60k AUS for the X, 70k AUS for the M) and said that despite his costs he will come out ahead should he decide to sell it off. He is himself arranging an import. The X and M are almost identical, with the M being the newer version. A new M in the U.S. will cost maybe 30-34K U.S. tricked out with a 4-stroke 50HP and other common add-ons. I think the bare boat itself with trailer and just a mainsail is 20-24K U.S. Apparently trade between the U.S. and Oz/NZ is well restricted between distance and regs. One of my sons recently sold his Chicago based Bayliner powerboat for an attractive price (he wanted a quick sale) to an Aussie working in Indiana. The fellow told my son he would be sending the boat off for sale in Australia and pocket 10k U.S. on the deal. All very strange. Another of my sons now resides in Sydney and tells me there are similar price anomalies with some U.S. cars, where older models not given a second look here (Ford Taurus, eg) sell for seemingly large sums in Australia. If I had more energy I might look into U.S./Oz import/export business. The price is good, and the cabin is spacious in feel. I like that. Pretty scary you would say the price is good for a Mac 26 in Oz/NZ, given what I've heard. Were you looking there or in the U.S.? Agree on the Mac 26 cabin. The spartan nature gives it a less claustrophobic feel than similar sized boats. But some will see that lack of cabinetry as inadequate stowage. --Vic Think of the opportunity for some young Australian adventurer who wants to make some good money. Hitch a ride on a yacht as crew en route to California. Buy a Mac26M in California and sail it to Australia. Then sell it there. Good sailing for the adventurer and good bargain for the buyer and everybody's happy. I bet some young man or woman could do three or four trips a year and make a decent enough living.Might even write a book about it and make even more money. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Gordon" wrote in message 8... Think of the opportunity for some young Australian adventurer who wants to make some good money. Hitch a ride on a yacht as crew en route to California. Buy a Mac26M in California and sail it to Australia. Then sell it there. Good sailing for the adventurer and good bargain for the buyer and everybody's happy. I bet some young man or woman could do three or four trips a year and make a decent enough living.Might even write a book about it and make even more money. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm You don't really think that's a feasible plan, do you Ed? |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KLC Lewis" wrote in
et: You don't really think that's a feasible plan, do you Ed? Why not? Some kid just crossed from England to the BVI islands in a sailboat that's a Mac copy. A real Mac should be capable of an easy downwind Pacific run. You'd have to stock up on groceries carefully and maybe use the water ballast tank for your fresh water but you could make it. The engine would do you little good for such a long trip so maybe be a purist and go engineless?? They probably have cheap engines in Australia anyway, think? -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Gordon" wrote in message . .. "KLC Lewis" wrote in et: You don't really think that's a feasible plan, do you Ed? Why not? Some kid just crossed from England to the BVI islands in a sailboat that's a Mac copy. A real Mac should be capable of an easy downwind Pacific run. You'd have to stock up on groceries carefully and maybe use the water ballast tank for your fresh water but you could make it. The engine would do you little good for such a long trip so maybe be a purist and go engineless?? They probably have cheap engines in Australia anyway, think? -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm Well, let's look at it rationally. Three to four trips in one year? That means sailing year-round, in all weather conditions, including winter storms and summer cyclone season, not to mention three or four trips across the doldrums. Let's say three round trips, to make it easier on our lucky sailor. Six crossings of the Pacific round trip in one year. And not a simple rhumb-line passage from, say San Diego to Sydney, because that is simply impossible. No, our sailor will need to follow the prevailing winds and currents, meaning a southerly course down and a northerly course up. Essentially, the return trip will mean sailing at least as far north as Washington, then coming back down the west coast. Of course, they could always just fly back, but that would eat into their profits. They'd be lucky to do two trips in a year, and would be beaten up pretty well by the time it's over. |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KLC Lewis" wrote in
et: Well, let's look at it rationally. Three to four trips in one year? That means sailing year-round, in all weather conditions, including winter storms and summer cyclone season, not to mention three or four trips across the doldrums. Let's say three round trips, to make it easier on our lucky sailor. Six crossings of the Pacific round trip in one year. And not a simple rhumb-line passage from, say San Diego to Sydney, because that is simply impossible. No, our sailor will need to follow the prevailing winds and currents, meaning a southerly course down and a northerly course up. Essentially, the return trip will mean sailing at least as far north as Washington, then coming back down the west coast. Of course, they could always just fly back, but that would eat into their profits. They'd be lucky to do two trips in a year, and would be beaten up pretty well by the time it's over. It would be dumb to sail back. What they'd be doing is more like a delivery captain trip. Have two adverturesome young men sail down each taking a Mac26M and sailing in company for safety. Deliver the boats and make about 20 grand profit or more each. Then fly back to California and do it again. What's an airline ticket cost from Australia to California? Two grand? That's a eighteen grand profit for about a month's work. You could do as many trips as you could during the off season to not run into typhoons. I think you could do six trips a year by flying back. According to sailing instructions it's a downwind milk run from California to Australia. You'd have to cross a bit of doldrums around Hawaii but then you're in the trades and going like all getout right for Australia. Remember how Capt. Bligh went from Tahiti all the way past Australia in an open row boat? It would be a piece of cake in a Mac. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan McC (NZ) wrote in
. nz: Pretty scary you would say the price is good for a Mac 26 in Oz/NZ, given what I've heard. Were you looking there or in the U.S.? Agree on the Mac 26 cabin. The spartan nature gives it a less claustrophobic feel than similar sized boats. But some will see that lack of cabinetry as inadequate stowage. Indeed the word 'spartan' came to mind - and indeed there is not a lot of locker space as a result - probably not *that* bad for a weekend or even a week away - at least everything is at hand (don't have to rumage around lockers - as I do on my boat). There's more storage space than you might think. Check out this video and watch the part where the dude shows all the storage. Pretty impressive sales pitch. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...19&q=macgregor -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
US federal judge declares boating illegal in all US navigable waters | General | |||
Weapons on board outside of USA waters. . . what to do? | General | |||
What does it take to enter US waters by boat? | General | |||
Waters Dancing Boat Kits | Touring | |||
Free Boundary Waters Thermal Shirt | Touring |