"JimC" wrote in message
news

Thanks for the kind words Scotty. Sorry you had to sell
your Mac.

You're welcome. Oh, and I didn't have to sell my Mac, I
wanted to.

Scotty

Scotty wrote:
"JimC" wrote in message
news
Thanks for the kind words Scotty. Sorry you had to sell

your Mac.

You're welcome. Oh, and I didn't have to sell my Mac, I
wanted to.

Scotty



At the time, maybe. - But I've seen several notes you posted since then
that suggest you had some good times on your Mack.

Jim

Scotty's sarcastic notes didn't address the gist of my original note, of
course. (They never do. - He seems to be afraid to actually get into a
discussion relating to the substance of what was posted. Like a spoiled
little brat, if he doesn't like the gist of the discussion, he hides
behind his snide, cutesy remarks so he won't have to actually respond to
what was said. - Knowing that if he did, he would get his ass kicked.)

But in any event, does anyone doubt what was stated in my post regarding
Wilbur's problems?

Jim




JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor schmuck
living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you can come up
with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has to do what he
can to get out on the water and should realize even an unnoteworthy
vessel is better than no vessel at all.



Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a lawyer to
show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A Hinckley, a
Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You get the picture.
Could you honestly have much confidence in a lawyer who could not
afford one of the above or was so ignorant that he sailed a MacGregor
26? ---------------------------------------------------------------------


To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me (the only
lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take the bait, he
was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone else and more
or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better luck next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have all
the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim

JimC wrote:
Scotty's sarcastic notes didn't address the gist of my original note, of
course. (They never do. - He seems to be afraid to actually get into a
discussion relating to the substance of what was posted. Like a spoiled
little brat, if he doesn't like the gist of the discussion, he hides
behind his snide, cutesy remarks so he won't have to actually respond to
what was said. - Knowing that if he did, he would get his ass kicked.)

But in any event, does anyone doubt what was stated in my post regarding
Wilbur's problems?

Jim




JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor
schmuck living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you can
come up with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has to do
what he can to get out on the water and should realize even an
unnoteworthy vessel is better than no vessel at all.




Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a lawyer
to show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A Hinckley,
a Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You get the
picture. Could you honestly have much confidence in a lawyer who
could not afford one of the above or was so ignorant that he sailed a
MacGregor 26?
---------------------------------------------------------------------



To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me (the
only lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take the
bait, he was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone else
and more or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better luck
next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have all
the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim

Take a pill, Jim...you're sounding strident...

katy wrote:

JimC wrote:

Scotty's sarcastic notes didn't address the gist of my original note,
of course. (They never do. - He seems to be afraid to actually get
into a discussion relating to the substance of what was posted. Like a
spoiled little brat, if he doesn't like the gist of the discussion, he
hides behind his snide, cutesy remarks so he won't have to actually
respond to what was said. - Knowing that if he did, he would get his
ass kicked.)

But in any event, does anyone doubt what was stated in my post
regarding Wilbur's problems?

Jim




JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor
schmuck living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you
can come up with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has
to do what he can to get out on the water and should realize even an
unnoteworthy vessel is better than no vessel at all.





Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a lawyer
to show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A
Hinckley, a Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You
get the picture. Could you honestly have much confidence in a lawyer
who could not afford one of the above or was so ignorant that he
sailed a MacGregor 26?
---------------------------------------------------------------------




To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted
the initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me
(the only lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take
the bait, he was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone
else and more or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. -
Better luck next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have
all the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim


Take a pill, Jim...you're sounding strident...

Sorry Katy. In any event, I hope you have a pleasant evening.

Jim

"JimC" wrote in message
. net...


katy wrote:

JimC wrote:

Scotty's sarcastic notes didn't address the gist of my original
note, of course. (They never do. - He seems to be afraid to actually
get into a discussion relating to the substance of what was posted.
Like a spoiled little brat, if he doesn't like the gist of the
discussion, he hides behind his snide, cutesy remarks so he won't
have to actually respond to what was said. - Knowing that if he did,
he would get his ass kicked.)

But in any event, does anyone doubt what was stated in my post
regarding Wilbur's problems?

Jim




JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor
schmuck living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you
can come up with to sail I say more power to you. A working man
has to do what he can to get out on the water and should realize
even an unnoteworthy vessel is better than no vessel at all.




Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a
lawyer to show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A
Hinckley, a Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You
get the picture. Could you honestly have much confidence in a
lawyer who could not afford one of the above or was so ignorant
that he sailed a MacGregor
26? ---------------------------------------------------------------------




To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted
the initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me
(the only lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't
take the bait, he was stuck with all the indignant responses from
everyone else and more or less made an ass of himself. Sorry,
Wilbur. - Better luck next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have
all the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim


Take a pill, Jim...you're sounding strident...

Sorry Katy. In any event, I hope you have a pleasant evening.

Jim


I like it when I aggravate you until you get strident pats own back.
It shows my superiority. Bwaaahahahahahahahaha! It's good to see I've
got you thinking about your embarrassing choice of a boat.

Wilbur Hubbard

JimC wrote:


Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor schmuck
living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you can come up
with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has to do what he
can to get out on the water and should realize even an unnoteworthy
vessel is better than no vessel at all.

------------------------------------------------------------------
To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me (the only
lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take the bait, he
was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone else and more
or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better luck next time

Once more. Does anyone doubt that Wilbur (or whoever he is) ended up
with responses he didn't anticipate, when his trolling didn't get the
response he was looking for, and when he ended up having to answer a
number of indignant responses from others participating in the discussion.

Jim

"JimC" wrote in message
et...


JimC wrote:


Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor
schmuck living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you
can come up with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has
to do what he can to get out on the water and should realize even an
unnoteworthy vessel is better than no vessel at all.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted
the initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me
(the only lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take
the bait, he was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone
else and more or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. -
Better luck next time

Once more. Does anyone doubt that Wilbur (or whoever he is) ended up
with responses he didn't anticipate, when his trolling didn't get the
response he was looking for, and when he ended up having to answer a
number of indignant responses from others participating in the
discussion.

Jim

You'll never make a decent troll. You don't have a clue about what
motivates a troll. The type of response matters little. As a matter of
fact, the more indignant the response the better. Trolls are puppet
masters. Not, that I claim to be one. I'm just a sailor who likes to
talk about sailing. And motoring around in a Mac26 is a far cry from
sailing. So, get off the group you big dope!

Wilbur Hubbard

Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

"JimC" wrote in message
et...



JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor
schmuck living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you
can come up with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has
to do what he can to get out on the water and should realize even an
unnoteworthy vessel is better than no vessel at all.

------------------------------------------------------------------
To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted
the initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me
(the only lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take
the bait, he was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone
else and more or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better
luck next time


Once more. Does anyone doubt that Wilbur (or whoever he is) ended up
with responses he didn't anticipate, when his trolling didn't get the
response he was looking for, and when he ended up having to answer a
number of indignant responses from others participating in the
discussion.

Jim


You'll never make a decent troll. You don't have a clue about what
motivates a troll.

I have no interest in becoming a troll, if that's what you mean.


The type of response matters little. As a matter of
fact, the more indignant the response the better. Trolls are puppet
masters. Not, that I claim to be one.

You don't get it, do you Wilbur. (Or more likely, you're not willing to
admit it.) - It's obvious that you were aiming at me, but you missed.
Instead, you shot yourself in the foot.


I'm just a sailor who likes to
talk about sailing. And motoring around in a Mac26 is a far cry from
sailing.

Sure thing, Wilbur. - Just another devoted sailor who likes to talk
about sailing. (Plus Al Gore, fat people (human swine, according to
you), daylight savings time, anyone who questions Bush's judgement, dumb
illiterates who live in DC, all Dems, etc., etc.


So, get off the group you big dope!


Not a chance. - But maybe you should consider leaving, or at least
leaving behind your "Wilbur" mis-identification.

Jim

"JimC" wrote ...



I have no interest in becoming a sailor, if that's what
you mean.

Jim