Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've often wondered it this setup requires a "lock" on the pumpout to
comply with 33CFR159. Most descriptions of the reg refer to "preventing accidental discharge" or securing a "direct discharge" line. It would appear that the chance of an "accident" on your system is essentially nil. Mine is similar, except that it includes a y-valve to allow for either a manual pump discharge, or a deck pumpout. Since the y-valve looks like one that might permit direct discharge, I often keep a cable tie on it. I could also lock the hatch or hide the pump handle, but I'd probably lose the key or handle! Unfortunately, the actually CFR doesn't actually mention "accidental" or "direct discharge." It more generally requires securing any means of discharge. If the holding tank is considered part of the MSD Type III system, then it would seem its pumping system would be included. 33CFR159.7 Roger Long wrote: I've had very good luck with this very simple set up shown on this and the following page. http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Strider0601.htm No "Y" valve, no macerator pump. You have to pump by hand but, hey, we could all use a little exercise at our age. .... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building | |||
Sunday's VHF antics.....and a question.. | Electronics |