| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob wrote:
But there are some folks that say "upgrade" to more modern model. Modern isn't always better. I don't know what is going on with small marine diesels now but I fear my recent experience with aircraft maintenance may be relevant to boats. If anyone has data to add on these points, I'd appreciate hearing it. In aviation, things that used to last for hundreds of hours a couple decades ago began failing very rapidly about a decade ago. This applies to vital engine parts like valve lifters and camshafts as well as flight instruments. The reasons are all the globalization issues. A turn coordinator used to be built in a place where someone who had been assembling them for 20 years knew that if one part swung back and forth just a certain way when trial assembled, it was good to continue. Otherwise the parts needed some tweaking. The company gets bought by someone who thinks they can make a profit by increasing effeciency so they fire everyone and hire younger people who will work for less. All they know is that part A goes into part B and they have to assemble 20% more than the old crew did or they'll be looking for a job. There is a specification and a procedure for heat treating valve lifter faces. Somebody, or a crew who has been doing it for a long time, knows something like the fact that letting the kiln cool down with the parts in it instead of just taking them out is the difference between parts that fail prematurely and those last. This never makes it into the specification because it's just the way they've always done it. The company gets sold and the production is moved to China where they follow the specifications to the letter but the parts still start failing half way to overhaul time. A lot of things like engines were designed to be built by artisans who cared and understood them and have not made the transition to modern times gracefully. A thouroughly modern engine built on a thouroughly modern production line with the advantages of computer machining, etc. may be better. Automotive engines certainly are. I'm not sure that something like a small marine diesel is better simply because it's a newer model. If I were replacing an engine in an aircraft and strapping my butt behind it, I would prefer an engine overhauled by a good overhauler who looked at, evaluated, and adjusted, each part individually than a brand new one from an assembly line. I'm not sure this hold true for boats but my first inclination if I had your engine would be to go for the overhaul. -- Roger Long |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Volvo vs Yanmar diesel | Cruising | |||
| EP: Yanmar YSB12 starts after long layup,.. | Boat Building | |||
| Yanmar saildrives and other options | ASA | |||
| FS: Yanmar 6LP parts in Tampa, Florida | Marketplace | |||
| repower P 4-154 | Cruising | |||