Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
Most of the experts say it isn't cost-effective, particularly with the durability of the 2-part epoxy paints. I don't doubt that what you say is true, however... It seems to me that if the manufacturers could save a bit by switching from gel coat to Imron or Awlgrip they would. Yet the boat manufacturing industry uniformly uses gel coat instead of paint. Professional fiberglass repair places also routinely respray the gel coat and then buff it out. There is little cost difference between the materials, and the preparation is similar. Could it be that the popularity of two-part paints is because they can be applied more easily by the DIY crowd? Regards, Don W. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need to remoe fiberglass from hull | Boat Building | |||
steel hull, zinc anodes | Cruising | |||
Chainplates ,, attaching to hull | Boat Building | |||
Olympic Cub hull rehab strategy | Boat Building | |||
Morphing hull | Cruising |