Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right. BoatUS and the Ohio Deparment of Natural Resources are zealous
pro-pwc propogandists. The reports of pwc's being used in Katrina rescue operations and marine life rescues and other law enforcement and safety operations are made up, just like the so-called stories of moon landings. Your "observations" obviously supercede any facts or reports that suggest that your prejudices, preconceptions and stereotypes might not be up to date or fully accurate. The fact that four-strokes have replaced about 90% of 2-strokes in the new pwc market over the last five years resulting in some of the very cleanest-running, most fuel-efficient and very quietest power boats on the water today, is something I just made up, with no facts behind it to support it. Your "observations" tell you so and I don't blame you for refusing to consider that there might be more to the issue than you're aware of. The fact that the vast overwhelming majority of pwc's sold are three-seaters for use with their families is a lie. The idea that mandatory training requirements have decreased accident, injury and conflict statistics in all states that have instituted them is also fiction, to be ignored by you because of the wisdom and infallibility of your "observations." The fact that enviromental impact analyses have resulted in proposed pwc bans being rolled back and rejected is another fiction I made up. (Or is due to the influence of an incredibly powerful pwc industry lobby? Uh huh.) Your personal observations tell you all you need to know about the noise level, environmental impact, and pollution level of modern 4-stroke pwc's that have been increasingly the rule among new units sold since 2002. You should continue to make insulting pronouncements about thousands of your fellow boaters including myself, my wife, and many of my friends, without bothering to acquire any further information on the topic...based of course on your observations. Why can't you just admit that maybe your information is out of date and that you don't know everything, and that it's very likely that a lot of what you think you know could be very wrong? It's obvious that you don't care to be more informed on the matter, and that's certainly your right, but you should at least admit that your chosen ignorance and stubbornly clung-to beliefs, inform your opinion on the matter, rather than any actual curioisity, open-mindedness or knowledgeability on the topic. richforman |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|