| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roger Long" wrote in news:qPkjf.51442$uC3.511
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: No terribly clear but, buoys were never intended to be used without charts. I would disagree with that statement, to a point. The general flow of buoys (sticking to the East Coast,USA) is North to South, East to West (E-W is "old school") coming from sea. What this meant was that if you should see a buoy while moving along the coast and for whatever reason, you didn't have a chart/chart out of date/you're lost, based on the "N-S", you would know which side to pass. With out a doubt, a chart is your best bet to see and understand what the buoys mean, but be sure you look at the "BIG" picture of an area to check the overall direction the system is taking. otn |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
A basic principle of buoy philosophy that is often overlooked is that
they mark what is safe; not what is dangerous. There may be a buoy by an isolated shoal but it is there to show you where the deep water is on the preferred side. A patch of water isn't safe just because there is no buoy. That's why you need charts. NO navigational aid or device is intended to be used alone. The essence of my point is that the buoy arrangement in a place like Woods Hole is not deficient just because some navigators will need a chart to understand it readily or to orient themselves when they get there. With a smidgen of understanding, Woods Hole is a piece of cake, even with the current behind you. You just go straight through into the harbor and then head out into the sound. I've done it many times even in a kayak and mostly just gone with the flow. It's when people without sufficient understanding of current, rudders, boats, and water, try to turn into the other channel because it's the shorter and seems the obvious thing to do that the Coast Guard gets called out. -- Roger Long "otnmbrd" wrote in message 25.201... "Roger Long" wrote in news:qPkjf.51442$uC3.511 @twister.nyroc.rr.com: No terribly clear but, buoys were never intended to be used without charts. I would disagree with that statement, to a point. The general flow of buoys (sticking to the East Coast,USA) is North to South, East to West (E-W is "old school") coming from sea. What this meant was that if you should see a buoy while moving along the coast and for whatever reason, you didn't have a chart/chart out of date/you're lost, based on the "N-S", you would know which side to pass. With out a doubt, a chart is your best bet to see and understand what the buoys mean, but be sure you look at the "BIG" picture of an area to check the overall direction the system is taking. otn |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll intersperse some comments......
"Roger Long" wrote in message news ![]() A basic principle of buoy philosophy that is often overlooked is that they mark what is safe; not what is dangerous. G Point of view..... I'd say they do both to varying degrees. There may be a buoy by an isolated shoal but it is there to show you where the deep water is on the preferred side. A patch of water isn't safe just because there is no buoy. That's why you need charts. No argument. NO navigational aid or device is intended to be used alone. No argument. The essence of my point is that the buoy arrangement in a place like Woods Hole is not deficient just because some navigators will need a chart to understand it readily or to orient themselves when they get there. Would agree ..... however EG having discussed this channel with a number of people who are approaching from Buzzards Bay, I can understand their initial confusion and reason for it. With a smidgen of understanding, Woods Hole is a piece of cake, even with the current behind you. You just go straight through into the harbor and then head out into the sound. I've done it many times even in a kayak and mostly just gone with the flow. G I always preferred "Broadway". It's when people without sufficient understanding of current, rudders, boats, and water, try to turn into the other channel because it's the shorter and seems the obvious thing to do that the Coast Guard gets called out. Reminds me of another incident ..... was coming through from Buzzards Bay and made my turn down "Broadway" followed by a larger sloop than mine. After settling myself out on course, looked back at other sloop only to see him doing circles at the corner. He finally followed the main route after coming too close to one buoy. otn |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
otnmbrd wrote:
"Roger Long" wrote in news:qPkjf.51442$uC3.511 @twister.nyroc.rr.com: No terribly clear but, buoys were never intended to be used without charts. I would disagree with that statement, to a point. The general flow of buoys (sticking to the East Coast,USA) is North to South, East to West (E-W is "old school") coming from sea. What this meant was that if you should see a buoy while moving along the coast and for whatever reason, you didn't have a chart/chart out of date/you're lost, based on the "N-S", you would know which side to pass. With out a doubt, a chart is your best bet to see and understand what the buoys mean, but be sure you look at the "BIG" picture of an area to check the overall direction the system is taking. otn That wouldn't work around Vancouver Island. I think your N-S, E-W premise is wrong. The buoyage system is meant to relate to the direction of flooding tides and around here it is very difficult, without a chart and/or tide table, to know which direction the flood goes. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary wrote in news:1vNjf.6503$Eq5.2807@pd7tw1no:
otnmbrd wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in news:qPkjf.51442$uC3.511 @twister.nyroc.rr.com: No terribly clear but, buoys were never intended to be used without charts. I would disagree with that statement, to a point. The general flow of buoys (sticking to the East Coast,USA) is North to South, East to West (E-W is "old school") coming from sea. What this meant was that if you should see a buoy while moving along the coast and for whatever reason, you didn't have a chart/chart out of date/you're lost, based on the "N-S", you would know which side to pass. With out a doubt, a chart is your best bet to see and understand what the buoys mean, but be sure you look at the "BIG" picture of an area to check the overall direction the system is taking. otn That wouldn't work around Vancouver Island. I think your N-S, E-W premise is wrong. The buoyage system is meant to relate to the direction of flooding tides and around here it is very difficult, without a chart and/or tide table, to know which direction the flood goes. The N-S is East Coast ..... West Coast is S-N (W-E, old school) and again this is a general along the coast, coming from sea. Once you get into (In your case, the Straits and Pujet sound) an "inland" area, you will need to understand the flow of your area. Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting running without charts .... if anything, I prefer having a small and large scale of an area I'm transiting ( the small may help you determine tide flow .... barring stopping and watching, if you don't have tables or some other means of determining). My point was, that knowing some buoy basics, can help you figure out a system as well keep you in clear water when running an area you may not be readily familiar with. otn |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
otnmbrd wrote:
Gary wrote in news:1vNjf.6503$Eq5.2807@pd7tw1no: otnmbrd wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in news:qPkjf.51442$uC3.511 : No terribly clear but, buoys were never intended to be used without charts. I would disagree with that statement, to a point. The general flow of buoys (sticking to the East Coast,USA) is North to South, East to West (E-W is "old school") coming from sea. What this meant was that if you should see a buoy while moving along the coast and for whatever reason, you didn't have a chart/chart out of date/you're lost, based on the "N-S", you would know which side to pass. With out a doubt, a chart is your best bet to see and understand what the buoys mean, but be sure you look at the "BIG" picture of an area to check the overall direction the system is taking. otn That wouldn't work around Vancouver Island. I think your N-S, E-W premise is wrong. The buoyage system is meant to relate to the direction of flooding tides and around here it is very difficult, without a chart and/or tide table, to know which direction the flood goes. The N-S is East Coast ..... West Coast is S-N (W-E, old school) and again this is a general along the coast, coming from sea. Once you get into (In your case, the Straits and Pujet sound) an "inland" area, you will need to understand the flow of your area. Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting running without charts .... if anything, I prefer having a small and large scale of an area I'm transiting ( the small may help you determine tide flow .... barring stopping and watching, if you don't have tables or some other means of determining). My point was, that knowing some buoy basics, can help you figure out a system as well keep you in clear water when running an area you may not be readily familiar with. otn The NS and SN of the two coasts is the direction of the flood tides in general. The actual rule for buoys is "returning from seaward" which is defacto the same as the flood tide. It has nothing to do with the NS/SN stuff. Never mind the buoys, have a chart. Buoys drag, break free, are hit by ships, get covered in bird****, and are frequently wrong. Always look at the best scale, up-to-date chart for the area. If you are over 66 feet, it's the law. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Gary" wrote in message news: The NS and SN of the two coasts is the direction of the flood tides in general. The actual rule for buoys is "returning from seaward" which is defacto the same as the flood tide. It has nothing to do with the NS/SN stuff. Never mind the buoys, have a chart. Buoys drag, break free, are hit by ships, get covered in bird****, and are frequently wrong. Always look at the best scale, up-to-date chart for the area. If you are over 66 feet, it's the law. Find the latest Bowditch and read Article 519 ....... otn |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here in Casco Bay there are many places where the general rules you
would rely on would be at odds with the "Returning" concept. A committee could spend days without coming to a clear conclusion about which side red should be on depending on whether they are thinking from the mindset of big ships that use only the major channels, yachts that use pleasure boat anchorages, etc. By relying on buoy layout alone, do you want to bet your boat that you will come always to the same conclusion as the long ago guy who laid out the buoy system when it could have been a coin toss in some situations? Maybe it's different where you sail but, in many parts of Maine, the buoys are primarily markers to help you locate yourself on the chart. Even if you can figure out which side red is supposed to be on, just keeping the right color on the proper side will WHAM! -- Roger Long |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roger Long wrote:
Here in Casco Bay there are many places where the general rules you would rely on would be at odds with the "Returning" concept. A committee could spend days without coming to a clear conclusion about which side red should be on depending on whether they are thinking from the mindset of big ships that use only the major channels, yachts that use pleasure boat anchorages, etc. By relying on buoy layout alone, do you want to bet your boat that you will come always to the same conclusion as the long ago guy who laid out the buoy system when it could have been a coin toss in some situations? Maybe it's different where you sail but, in many parts of Maine, the buoys are primarily markers to help you locate yourself on the chart. Even if you can figure out which side red is supposed to be on, just keeping the right color on the proper side will WHAM! Well said. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Comments interspersed:
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... Here in Casco Bay there are many places where the general rules you would rely on would be at odds with the "Returning" concept. A committee could spend days without coming to a clear conclusion about which side red should be on depending on whether they are thinking from the mindset of big ships that use only the major channels, yachts that use pleasure boat anchorages, etc. What I am commenting on are not "general rules you rely on", but instead are "general rules you begin with". By relying on buoy layout alone, do you want to bet your boat that you will come always to the same conclusion as the long ago guy who laid out the buoy system when it could have been a coin toss in some situations? I don't look at just one buoy without looking at it's meaning within the particular area/system I am transiting. If approaching an unfamiliar area, I will have looked at the "big picture" to see why a particular buoy is where it is and how it relates to the area/system it's concerned with (which may easily involve an apparent departure from the initial basics). Maybe it's different where you sail but, in many parts of Maine, the buoys are primarily markers to help you locate yourself on the chart. Even if you can figure out which side red is supposed to be on, just keeping the right color on the proper side will WHAM! Yes a buoy will locate your position, yes it will tell you where a danger lies, yes it will tell you where the good water is....... as long as it's on station (oops, guess that's not where I am). If you concentrate on a single buoy without knowing how it relates to a particular system/area, then you will frequently have reason for confusion. There are many areas where the beginning basics may not and don't help you out (they're a starting point). When they don't look at the approaches to your area and/or what comes after in the scheme of the system you are working (something you definitely need a chart for). The N-S along the East Coast is for someone coming in from the Atlantic (and Intracoastal) and not necessarily for someone in Penobscot Bay. So we're sure it's understood ..... I am in no way suggesting you can or should run without charts. My point being that there ARE some areas where the basic "from seaward" rules do apply and need to be used and as you move inland, you need to keep these basic rules in mind and be aware that you may have trouble relating them to what you are now seeing. Do not focus on one buoy, instead focus on the system and use all your info to help solve any confusion. otn |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sea Ray Sundancer Bilge Question | General | |||
| bilge pump question | Boat Building | |||
| Water in the bilge | Boat Building | |||
| Water in the bilge | Cruising | |||
| Sea Ray Sundancer 250 DA bilge queation | General | |||