Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:46:06 -0800, Stephen Trapani
wrote: I have a Hunter 33', stronger than a MacGregor, but I would never venture out into the ocean with it. On the other hand, I crewed numerous times on a Blanchard 33' in very heavy seas and felt as safe as a bug in a rug. There's a Hunter 33 down the dock from me, and while it looks roomy as hell below, with all that windage and the high boom, it gets slapped around on windy days on Lake Ontario. These days not all boats are designed to be seaworthy, but rather "daysail in 15 knots max."-worthy. There's no harm in that, if that's what you want. And most people do. Ocean-going boats, for reasons of stability, safety and comfort, are frequently narrow and occasionally dark below...the expectation is that you'll be on deck most of the time, anyway. There's exceptions to this, of course, but we can't all afford Moody and Swan models. As for the original poster, I smell troll. A good way to get sailors to pitch fits in type is to suggest first a Bayliner and then a MacGregor 26 as ocean-crossing boats. What's next, a C&C Mega? R. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Atlantic Crossing on small power boat ? | Crew | |||
Atlantic Crossing on small power Boat ? | Cruising | |||
Atlantic Crossing on small power boat ? | General | |||
Did Macgregor go out of business. | ASA |