Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sport.jet-ski,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately, there are still a high
percentage of morons out there that continue to contribute to the image of jet-skiers as clueless fools or dangerous assholes. Keep at it though... keep at it. (Alright, I changed my mind, I will "take the bait" to an extent) Keep at it? I intend to, and I have been "at it" for years now... by "it" I mean trying to educate people about pwc's, who uses them, and how, and also actively fighting bans that I and lots of other people feel are patently unfair. (Going to public meetings, writing letters, signing petitions, joining clubs, supporting organizations that fight for my rights to use public waterways, and "representing" on behalf of the pwc community every time I go out on the water.) And I and my friends in the effort have had a good amount of success in this effort. I've probably educated just about anyone I came in contact with over the last eight years, who had any interest in the subject of boating, friends, relatives, and especially fellow boaters, about things they never realized about pwc's, what people do with them, the fact that one has to get licensed to operate them, people are amazed and surprised by the ambitious travel cruises and vacations we use them for, the new clean technologies in use and the unbelievable range and fuel efficiency, and just the type of people (intelligent, respectable, respectful, family-man-type, law-abiding, sensible grownups basically - like me and pretty much everyone I have ridden with) who enjoy and own them, in contrast to their stereotype-informed notions.....and more importantly, there are almost no bans in effect anywhere in the tri-state area where I do most of my boating, although the state has a law that allows towns to enact pwc bans, almost none of them have (a few tiny exceptions, Montauk Harbor, although they won't hassle us if we idle in to get fuel on the way back from Block Island; also Point Pleasant Canal in NJ, so we have to take the long route on the ocean to get to Barnegat Bay which we don't mind a bit!)....and basically my many pwc'ing friends and I have no problems with any of the hundreds or thousands of other boaters we come in contact with out in the Long Island Sound, the Great South Bay, the Hudson River, the Atlantic Ocean, New York Harbor, Staten Island.....I never feel like a second-class citizen, am never called names like an annoying mosquito or clueless moron, basically anywhere in the world except here in this thread. So this makes me very confident that my efforts on behalf of myself and my fellow pwc'ers has been pretty successful in fighting prejucide ad stereortypes.... and most importantly, most of the national park bans that were temporarily enacted a few years back, have been rolled back or eliminated as the scientific evidence from the mandated environmental impact studies, plus of course public opinion on the matter, has rolled in, including two local areas, Fire Island National Seashore and Gateway National Park, have been largely rolled back and just replaced with some milder restrictions....so again I know my continuing efforts, and those of many others, to educate people and fight for our own rights, have met with some degree of success, and I certainly plan to as you say "keep at it." If you consider me your enemy and hope I fail in my efforts, well, then I guess that's the way it is, hopefully you're going to meetings too and arguing for increased pwc bans, that's your right. But really having heard from me, I would think that you would actually afford me some respect, "j.," based on my being obviously a fairly educated, informed, passionate, serious and very active fellow boater. You seem to want to position me in an opposing camp from you because you have had negative experiences with other pwc'ers before, but the way I see it, we are really on the same side and in the same boat, as it were. You should want me and every other safe, competent, educated, responsible boater to have access to the public waterways, just as surely as you want every unsafe, dangerous, idiotic boater off the water. richforman |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sport.jet-ski,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
wrote: Unfortunately, there are still a high percentage of morons out there that continue to contribute to the image of jet-skiers as clueless fools or dangerous assholes. Keep at it though... keep at it. (Alright, I changed my mind, I will "take the bait" to an extent) Keep at it? I intend to, and I have been "at it" for years now... by "it" I mean trying to educate people about pwc's, who uses them, and And, I have no problem with that, and I'm glad you're doing it. There's a lot of work to do! (NOT A DIG ... jeez, now I'm editing myself for a jet-skier!) in this thread. So this makes me very confident that my efforts on behalf of myself and my fellow pwc'ers has been pretty successful in fighting prejucide ad stereortypes.... Not quite enough... suggestion... how about educating the ones who are still on the water with the noisy, pollution machines. According to your own words, those people are the ones giving your group a bad name. and most importantly, most of the national park bans that were temporarily enacted a few years back, have been rolled back or eliminated as the scientific evidence from the mandated environmental impact studies, plus of course public opinion on the matter, has rolled in, including two local areas, Fire Island National Seashore and Gateway National Park, have been largely rolled back and just replaced with some milder restrictions....so again I know my continuing efforts, and those of many others, to educate people and fight for our own rights, have met with some degree of success, and I certainly plan to as you say "keep at it." If it is shown that jet-skier are not damaging the physical environment nor disturbing the quiet enjoyment of others, I have no problem with them on public waterways. If you consider me your enemy and hope I fail in my efforts, well, then I guess that's the way it is, hopefully you're going to meetings too and arguing for increased pwc bans, that's your right. But really I only argue for what makes sense. You think I'm the enemy because of my first-hand experience with jet skies. That's your right. having heard from me, I would think that you would actually afford me some respect, "j.," based on my being obviously a fairly educated, informed, passionate, serious and very active fellow boater. You seem I certainly afford you "some" respect. to want to position me in an opposing camp from you because you have had negative experiences with other pwc'ers before, but the way I see it, we are really on the same side and in the same boat, as it were. I'm not putting you in any camp. I'm telling you what my experience has been from the time the jet ski first arrived. If things get better, as you claim they are, then that's just peachy! You should want me and every other safe, competent, educated, responsible boater to have access to the public waterways, just as surely as you want every unsafe, dangerous, idiotic boater off the water. The problem is that there is a huge prejudice against jet skiers. A couple of posts on usenet are not going to change that. What will change that is observable evidence by more and more people. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sport.jet-ski,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keep at it? I intend to, and I have been "at it" for years now...
by "it" I mean trying to educate people about pwc's, who uses them, and And, I have no problem with that, and I'm glad you're doing it. There's a lot of work to do! (NOT A DIG Thanks for the support and I wouldn't have taken that last sentence as a dig - I agree with it and realize it. I certainly afford you "some" respect. And I you. ... this makes me very confident that my efforts on behalf of myself and my fellow pwc'ers has been pretty successful in fighting prejucide ad stereortypes.... Not quite enough... suggestion... how about educating the ones who are still on the water with the noisy, pollution machines. According to your own words, those people are the ones giving your group a bad name. You're right - and I do that too. All of us more experienced knowledgeable pwc'ers always make it a point to take newer owners and operators out on the water and show them the ropes, try to help them avoid mistakes or let them know when they're making them, or offer advice and share information online in message-boards etc (and I'm no guru or anything myself, but have learned a decent amount in eight years of riding). As for the "noisy pollution machines," well obviously it's just a matter of time as they continue to be very naturally outnumbered phased out, since all the manufacturers are under strict new EPA regulations and have just more and more prominently/exclusively offered newer-tech, cleaner/quieter boats....just as in the power boating industry at large. I think you'll agree that there are plenty of "Noisy pollution machines" on the water besides older pwc's, in fact, other power boats seem to have longer life cycles, change hands more times and stay on the water for years or decades....at any rate, there's no shortage of noisy and polluting, or older-tech (carb'ed 2-stroke) engines still on the water in all kinds of boats....that condition is far from exclusive to the pwc world. And with all types of boats including pwc's, the handwriting is clearly on the wall, that an increasingly greater percentage of them will be cleaner and quieter and less polluting year after year due to market forces as well as government mandates. That part of it is not really in my hand or yours (I/we can't force individual people to retire their older dirtier louder machines until they want to), but happily, that's the way things are going and will continue to go. The problem is that there is a huge prejudice against jet skiers. A couple of posts on usenet are not going to change that. What will change that is observable evidence by more and more people. I just snipped out one of my usual long-winded responses - I'll just say this, I think a lot of progress has already been made, I don't really encounter any prejudiced anti-pwc attitude out in the real world, and I really don't see too many problems with it going on out on the water, and I'm out there a LOT, and cover a lot of ground and see a lot of fellow pwc'ers coexisting and interacting with all other fellow boaters, fishermen, law enforcement, kayakers (oh I'm one of them too btw, don't know if that would surprise you or anything - someone earlier in this thread I remember opined that pwc'ers probably don't really love the water or the outdoors, only speed, I guess that stereotype is pretty much deflated), surfers, pretty peacefully, successfully and non-problematically. I think a lot of it is due to the mandatory education requirement that's been in effect for the last five years or six years or so around here in NY, NJ and Ct. richforman richforman |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sport.jet-ski,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ok...
In article .com, wrote: Keep at it? I intend to, and I have been "at it" for years now... by "it" I mean trying to educate people about pwc's, who uses them, and Yep. Not quite enough... suggestion... how about educating the ones who are still on the water with the noisy, pollution machines. According to your own words, those people are the ones giving your group a bad name. You're right - and I do that too. All of us more experienced knowledgeable pwc'ers always make it a point to take newer owners and operators out on the water and show them the ropes, try to help them avoid mistakes or let them know Kewl. year after year due to market forces as well as government mandates. That part of it is not really in my hand or yours (I/we can't force individual people to retire their older dirtier louder machines until they want to), but How about a buy back program... good deals on trade-ins. The problem is that there is a huge prejudice against jet skiers. A couple of posts on usenet are not going to change that. What will change that is observable evidence by more and more people. I just snipped out one of my usual long-winded responses - I'll just :-) -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Jet Ski overheating problem | General | |||
Jet Ski overheating problem | Boat Building | |||
Sea Ray Sundancer 250 DA Bilge problem | General | |||
battery isolator problem! | Electronics |