Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , DSK
wrote: "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in JimC, If there is a collision and both boats could have avoided the collision, both boats can be held partially reasonable. If the sailboat in a passing situation turns in front of another boat and it is not reasonable for the other boater to avoid the collision, the powerboater will not be held responsible. Do you realize that your two statements are a direct contradiction of each other? Jim Carter wrote: Dr. Smithers, the first part of your statement is absolutely correct. The second part of your statement is incorrect in as much as there is no such thing as it being "not reasonable" for the powerboater to avoid the collision in the way Bill has described the situation. In this case it would have been the fault of Bill's judgement. He was too close and too fast in the situation. He MUST stay clear in the overtaking situation. But to most motorboaters, it is unreasonable to slow down and give other boats a wide berth. They have a RIGHT to go blasting right past any sailboat, close aboard, and by golly that durn sailboat better just stay outta their way! This is just the flipside of Donal's opinion that freighters in fog need to keep out of the way of his sailboat, and mount a visual lookout to ensure they comply..... PDW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Jet Ski overheating problem | General | |||
Jet Ski overheating problem | Boat Building | |||
Sea Ray Sundancer 250 DA Bilge problem | General | |||
battery isolator problem! | Electronics |