Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The OP was Bryan, and I thought it was his first name and I assumed he
was a male person because most of the people here are. He was the one who said I gotta laugh at some of this advice. Many claim you can't handle larger yachts without huge crew, exotic gear, and mega wallets. How many folks here have lived on, sailed, docked, bought, or maintained 50 footers, 60 footers, or 70 footers? Look at the 60's racing non-stop around the world by little girls. I was disputing that. So I'm confused as to whether you are disagreeing with me or with Bryan? It sounds like you agree with me. You aren't an older couple, but you seem to agree with me that racing is not the same as cruising and that 50 ft is approaching the top limit. "mickey" wrote: Madame, I am 30 and my usual crew is younger. I do not consider myself "older". I think 50 ft is aproaching the top limit. (I sail a CR38). Of course, I do not think people buy 60 foot boats with the intent of "downgrading" when they get "older". But at any rate. (I hope I do not sound offended. I've read your postings with great respect.) I do not think you have to consider what boat is too big for a crew of two to handle. I think any "crew of two" should be able to at least hobble somewhere single-handed. Things do not happen in isolation: if something happens which disables one of your crew, chances are it also may have disabled some part of your boat. Chances are the winds are stiff and the seas are high. Chances are sea spray may have disabled those push-button winches (did we replace those cables before we left dock last time or did some head issue take precedence?) Racing is another story altogether. I (used to) go four-wheel-driving in remote places. A lot of 4wd people like to point at the stuff racing cars, winners of derbys etc, put on their cars. I learned then: racing equipment is designed to last as long as the race, and no longer. Racers cannot afford the extra weight associated with heavily-built, long-lasting equipment. When racing, your objective is not to get from point A to point B. (Many cruisers have done so, after all.) Your objective is to get ther first. What happens afterwards does not matter. When cruising on the other hand, it is not sufficient to get to poitn B. You plan to then be on your way to point C, point D, etc. (How many racers live on their boats?) (I do not mean to distract from the racers. I just hope to show that the objectives are differnet, the equipment are more different. (note here that another objective of racing is to make money, if only enough to fund your next race. Cruisers do not expect to make money on their cruisng.) And Ms. Ellen McD. has won very much respect from me, fwiw.) But to my original point: when all is well and all your crew is at 100%, then we all may be able to handle a 60-footer with a crew of two. But most crusing folks I've talked to, from 30 to I-don't-dare-guess, have a story of an illness: Crew 1 had a bad shoulder; Crew 2 was feverish. Crew 1 got seasick; crew 2(autopilot/vane) gave up; I've myself been both feverish and seasick. M. Bryan, I would be very interested to know of your acquaintances who live aboard, and cruise, aboard a 50, 60, or 70 footer. I hope to be able to do so; I hope to learn something from them. Always learning. -Y grandma Rosalie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | Touring | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | General | |||
I was a Mac26X owner | ASA | |||
wanted: live-aboard boaters | Cruising |