Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using 2 slots for 2 headsails downwind is pretty common. It is a pain to
handle. Racers use 2-slot foils without roller furling alot. Doug "Steve" wrote in message ... I have a Harken furler system which has the double luff tape slots.. I have never noted any advantage or disadvantage to have one or two slots. I have two head sails that are of near identical size and have considered trying this for downwind sailing, rather than a spinniker. In thinking this out, a person would have to hoist both on the head swivel and then adjust the clew pennant at the swivel on the furler drum. The most difficult part would be to feed both at the sametime. Shouldn't be to difficult if you had a pre-feeder for each (about 25-30 bucks each). If your not interested in setting such a sail(s) then I can't see any disadvantage to having the extra slot. For me it doesn't bother me since I try to leave a half or full turn on the foil (to take the strain off the luff tape). Besides, kinda nice to have the extra groove incase one gets 'buggered up' or fouled buy ripped out luff tape. I'm not loosing any sleep over it. (well I guess I am, since it is near mid nite) -- My experience and opinion, FWIW -- Steve s/v Good Intentions |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, as others have said:
1) It costs the same to extrude 2 grooves as one. 2) When racing you make a headsail change by running the new jib up on the free groove then lowering the old sail. Remember to match the halyard to the groove, port to port and starboard to starboard or you will twist your halyards. 3) Sure you can raise a second jib without using the upper swivel but you will not be able roll either jib in this configuration. You need to lower the second jib to roll the first. 4) I like hanks but good roller furling has been well tested and is pretty durable. Good luck "Don White" wrote in message ... Steve wrote: Wow! What a brain Fart! I have been using the sail term 'clew' when I really meant 'TACK' .. I really know the difference and want to correct my error before the whole group Flames Me! Steve Thanks for clearing that up! I thought there was some kind of new-fangled hardware out there and couldn't figure out how it worked. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bryan wrote:
Well, as others have said: 1) It costs the same to extrude 2 grooves as one. 2) When racing you make a headsail change by running the new jib up on the free groove then lowering the old sail. Remember to match the halyard to the groove, port to port and starboard to starboard or you will twist your halyards. 3) Sure you can raise a second jib without using the upper swivel but you will not be able roll either jib in this configuration. You need to lower the second jib to roll the first. 4) I like hanks but good roller furling has been well tested and is pretty durable. Good luck One needs to consider the eventual breakdown of any equipment. It does go beyond convenience and cost, however. Somehow furling a too large jib one way or another, is critical as the wind increases, as can be a crew shortage. If I can pull a line to furl or douse, how then do I raise a suitable sized jib singlehanded, or with a small crew? I don't ever want to sail upwind with a bag for a jib, it is the most important sail. Swapping sails using a furler with no large crew seems a pain, as is the furler itself. It is easier for one crew to hank on a replacement, retreat to the cockpit and hoist it than to corral and feed a replacement and hoist it from the foredeck. It's safer using a jib pull down line and hanks than a furler when conditions get hairy enough to convince you you left reefing too late, but it must be done, now. Terry K "Don White" wrote in message ... Steve wrote: Wow! What a brain Fart! I have been using the sail term 'clew' when I really meant 'TACK' .. I really know the difference and want to correct my error before the whole group Flames Me! Steve Thanks for clearing that up! I thought there was some kind of new-fangled hardware out there and couldn't figure out how it worked. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Terry,
Well, that's what the inner forestay is for. We don't sail with a partially furled jib. We do carry smaller jibs hanked to an inner forestay for the conditions you mention. Will the furler ever fail? It may but I have also had halyards jump sheaves and heads jammed when they were ground into the mast head. In either circumstance a trip to the top was required to fix the problem. When it comes to roller furling jibs I'm willing to risk a possible failure for the benefit is provides. I can't say that about main furling systems today but who knows maybe I'll feel differently about those in the future. I guess what I'm saying is maintain your gear, be somewhat prudent, and have a plan for when stuff does not work as advertised. Fair winds, Bryan "Terry Spragg" wrote in message ... Bryan wrote: Well, as others have said: 1) It costs the same to extrude 2 grooves as one. 2) When racing you make a headsail change by running the new jib up on the free groove then lowering the old sail. Remember to match the halyard to the groove, port to port and starboard to starboard or you will twist your halyards. 3) Sure you can raise a second jib without using the upper swivel but you will not be able roll either jib in this configuration. You need to lower the second jib to roll the first. 4) I like hanks but good roller furling has been well tested and is pretty durable. Good luck One needs to consider the eventual breakdown of any equipment. It does go beyond convenience and cost, however. Somehow furling a too large jib one way or another, is critical as the wind increases, as can be a crew shortage. If I can pull a line to furl or douse, how then do I raise a suitable sized jib singlehanded, or with a small crew? I don't ever want to sail upwind with a bag for a jib, it is the most important sail. Swapping sails using a furler with no large crew seems a pain, as is the furler itself. It is easier for one crew to hank on a replacement, retreat to the cockpit and hoist it than to corral and feed a replacement and hoist it from the foredeck. It's safer using a jib pull down line and hanks than a furler when conditions get hairy enough to convince you you left reefing too late, but it must be done, now. Terry K "Don White" wrote in message ... Steve wrote: Wow! What a brain Fart! I have been using the sail term 'clew' when I really meant 'TACK' .. I really know the difference and want to correct my error before the whole group Flames Me! Steve Thanks for clearing that up! I thought there was some kind of new-fangled hardware out there and couldn't figure out how it worked. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roller Reefing | Cruising | |||
Roller Furling | Cruising | |||
WTB:Famet Roller Furling in California. | Marketplace | |||
Single Line reefing | Cruising | |||
Single line reefing | General |