Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We finally sailed "Strider".
http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Boat20.htm#Latest Boat feels great. Heavy, smooth, reassuring, motion like a traditional boat but responsive and tight turning like a modern craft. Exactly the combination I was looking for. We had a short period with plenty of wind for the working jib we flew for the first day out and she was moving right along. Heeled down to the sailing angle I would try to maintain in a heavy breeze, there was not a hint of weather helm and she seemed perfectly balanced. I'm sure there will be more helm pressure when trying to drive to windward in strong winds but I suspect the rudder modification was a big improvement to the steering qualities. She's not a very stiff boat which is probably at the root of a lot of the weather helm complaints I've heard about these boats.. That's the price of all that weight in the hull instead of ballast. I suspect I'll be using a bit of iron jib for any long windward legs when I need to be there instead of just enjoying the sailing. I'm very happy with this boat. Someone asked me why a designer would buy one. Well, she behaves pretty close to the way I would have designed a boat to act for what we want to do with this one. The previous owner had led every line except the ones holding the fenders to an impressive array of lever cams just forward of the cockpit. I'm sure he would have ended the fender lines there as well if he could have figured out how. That's not the way I want to sail the boat since I want to teach my kids how to work on deck and don't want all that activity and lines in the cockpit with the larger numbers we'll be sailing with. Since he moved one of the winches from the mast to the cabin top, we are now short a mast winch. I don't want to spring for another winch right now and the one on the cabin top will be handy for other things. It seems silly to have a seldom used line like the roller furling/reefing jib halyard in the cockpit so here's what I'm thinking of doing for that line: http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Halyard.jpg Since roller headsail changing underway is so infrequent in fair weather coastal sailing, I think this should work well. Halyard tension will be precise and convenient without having to use a winch handle. If I do need to get the sail down, the cam cleat will let me get enough slack to undo the sheet bend. -- Roger Long |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I nearly bought an Endeavor 32 before I bought my 28' S2. I kinda like
the boat. However, I really reccomend that you keep the control lines going tot eh cockpit. There is no reason the endanger your kids or yourself by having them go up on the cabin top for no reason. I cannot figure out why more boats do not lead halyards , etc to the cockpit. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... There is no reason the endanger your kids or yourself by having them go up on the cabin top for no reason. Reason is in the eye of the beholder. There is no reason to endanger your children or anyone else by taking them out on the water in a sinkable craft with lines under tension and heavy things swinging around. Teaching is the prime reason for us having this boat. Not all boats they sail are going to have all cockpit control and learning to work safely on deck is a foundation of seamanship. We also plan to sail with as many guests as the boat can comfortably hold and sometimes more. To do that, I've got to move as much activity out of the cockpit as possible. -- Roger Long |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, just cuz it was done in the past doesnt mean its a good idea now.
You could argue that real seamen sail with canvas sails butpeople would laugh at you for such an assertion. Technological advances are made for good reason and in this day there are few reasons for mast mounted winches. Old boats just are old, not better. I know thata Endeavor has an engine, do real seamen EVER use engines, of course they do although all boats do not have them and real seamen did not use them in the past. Auxiliary engines, like cockpit led control lines were a good idea. As far as getting room int eh cockpit for guests, simply coil the lines and put em on the cabin top when not in use. Creating danger for purely arbitrary reasons seems odd to me but I was simply suggesting based on my experience. Its your boat, set it up your way and enjoy. My appreciation for my cockpit led controls increased last month when I sailed from Sarasota to N. Florida across the Gulf of Mexico. After dark, the wind got up a little so I decided to reef. The guy who was sailing with me thought i had to go up on the cabin top to reef, instead I simply slacked the halyard and pulled on the reefing line and Voila, I never left the safety of the cockpit at night. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now you've got me curious. How much time do you have in older
"dangerous" boats? There is certainly a convenience issue with all cockpit control and it made sense for the retired couple who sailed this boat by themselves. I'm not sure about the danger though. The close overboard calls I had during my last quarter century of sailing were mostly in the cockpit where there are few handholds when you stand up to do something. At the mast, there are all sorts of handholds and they are at and above your center of gravity. The shrouds are between you and the ocean and there is this big solid thing you can lean against. On your other point: It's not the rope coils that take up the space. It's the person standing up to grind the winch and sticking his or her butt in the face of someone sitting in the cockpit. Then there are the flailing arms as the lines are coiled up. Believe me, it takes up a lot of space in a cockpit. -- Roger Long wrote in message oups.com... Well, just cuz it was done in the past doesnt mean its a good idea now. You could argue that real seamen sail with canvas sails butpeople would laugh at you for such an assertion. Technological advances are made for good reason and in this day there are few reasons for mast mounted winches. Old boats just are old, not better. I know thata Endeavor has an engine, do real seamen EVER use engines, of course they do although all boats do not have them and real seamen did not use them in the past. Auxiliary engines, like cockpit led control lines were a good idea. As far as getting room int eh cockpit for guests, simply coil the lines and put em on the cabin top when not in use. Creating danger for purely arbitrary reasons seems odd to me but I was simply suggesting based on my experience. Its your boat, set it up your way and enjoy. My appreciation for my cockpit led controls increased last month when I sailed from Sarasota to N. Florida across the Gulf of Mexico. After dark, the wind got up a little so I decided to reef. The guy who was sailing with me thought i had to go up on the cabin top to reef, instead I simply slacked the halyard and pulled on the reefing line and Voila, I never left the safety of the cockpit at night. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... Now you've got me curious. How much time do you have in older "dangerous" boats? There is certainly a convenience issue with all cockpit control and it made sense for the retired couple who sailed this boat by themselves. I'm not sure about the danger though. The close overboard calls I had during my last quarter century of sailing were mostly in the cockpit where there are few handholds when you stand up to do something. At the mast, there are all sorts of handholds and they are at and above your center of gravity. The shrouds are between you and the ocean and there is this big solid thing you can lean against. On your other point: It's not the rope coils that take up the space. It's the person standing up to grind the winch and sticking his or her butt in the face of someone sitting in the cockpit. Then there are the flailing arms as the lines are coiled up. Believe me, it takes up a lot of space in a cockpit. -- Roger Long wrote in message oups.com... Well, just cuz it was done in the past doesnt mean its a good idea now. You could argue that real seamen sail with canvas sails butpeople would laugh at you for such an assertion. Technological advances are made for good reason and in this day there are few reasons for mast mounted winches. Old boats just are old, not better. I know thata Endeavor has an engine, do real seamen EVER use engines, of course they do although all boats do not have them and real seamen did not use them in the past. Auxiliary engines, like cockpit led control lines were a good idea. As far as getting room int eh cockpit for guests, simply coil the lines and put em on the cabin top when not in use. Creating danger for purely arbitrary reasons seems odd to me but I was simply suggesting based on my experience. Its your boat, set it up your way and enjoy. My appreciation for my cockpit led controls increased last month when I sailed from Sarasota to N. Florida across the Gulf of Mexico. After dark, the wind got up a little so I decided to reef. The guy who was sailing with me thought i had to go up on the cabin top to reef, instead I simply slacked the halyard and pulled on the reefing line and Voila, I never left the safety of the cockpit at night. In my experience, the dangerous time is moving from the cockpit to wherever you're going, including standing up. Most boats have few handholds, the path is slippery, on an incline, and the boom is always an issue, not to mention various lines either under tension or lazy. After you get where you're going, it's not so bad, but then you have to return. I think it makes a lot of sense to have all lines led aft. It's not a complete solution, but it's helpful. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm, must be something about going out on bowsprits in the middle of
the night that has warped my perspective. Do you think someone who has grown up sailing only roller furling boats with all line handling done from the cockpit can be considered a competent sailor? This has some parallels with the GPS Vs pencil and chart discussions. -- Roger Long |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... Hmm, must be something about going out on bowsprits in the middle of the night that has warped my perspective. Do you think someone who has grown up sailing only roller furling boats with all line handling done from the cockpit can be considered a competent sailor? This has some parallels with the GPS Vs pencil and chart discussions. -- Roger Long Good point! :-) Having had the mailsail clew snap in the middle of a night shift and miss my head by about a foot is, I guess, something along the lines of what you were talking about. No, I don't. That said, after one becomes proficient, I don't see the need to perpetuate the ritual of going forward if I don't have to. Also, single-handing makes this much more difficult and dangerous. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In "Roger Long" writes:
Hmm, must be something about going out on bowsprits in the middle of the night that has warped my perspective. Do you think someone who has grown up sailing only roller furling boats with all line handling done from the cockpit can be considered a competent sailor? This has some parallels with the GPS Vs pencil and chart discussions. Everybody can rig his boat the best way he knows about and there are always some place for discussion. But anyone can have an opinion about different alternatives to perform various tasks, I do not really understand your reasoning. I have all my controll lines, reefing lines and hallyards led after to the cocpit. Still it does not mean, that I do not go to the foredeck. I do not have a furling gear and unless I end up buying a +55 footer I do not see why I should have one. Hoisting or lowering the jib has never been a problem. On the other hand I have seen many problems caused by the roller. Quite a many couples sail with a crew of two. It is to me a good system that the other can go if needed forward and still the other can pull the ropes in the cockpit. For example by dowsing the jib or the main, it is in many cases very convinient to have one handling the line from the cockpit and the other one giving a hand to help the sail to come down or letting loose a reefing line that is jammed. Even if you have a bundle of kids to perform the task, one can do it from the cockpit. Some people have the idea that if they have a furling gear they do not have to change the sail. So far I have not seen a jib or genoa that is strong enough to be used in 30 knots and light enough to be used in 6 knots of wind. Looks like most "sailors" solve this problem by motoring as soon as the wind goes below 10 knots or above 20 knots. At least my boat is sailing much better, not heeling so much and pointing higher if I use a 15 square meter jib, that is made of fairly heavy dacron and is cut very flat if the wind goes above 24 knots. But when there is less than 12 knots of wind I like to have a bit more sail, that is made from lighter material and is cut a bit fuller. So far the furlers do not change the thicknes of the cloth but they spoil the beautifull shape that the sailmaker has built in with so much effort. Then I have a real storm jib that is only 7 square meters, really strong and flat. So I end up changing the foresail once a while. Then we cet the practice to go to the foredeck. Even though it is important for the kids to learn to move around in the boat, I have this funny idea, that it is more important to teach them to sail properly, to learn about the trimming of the sails, getting the sensation and the feeling of well trimmed sails and nicely moving boat. Seems to me, that todays "sailors" with their furling gears have very little time to sail, as they always have the wrong sail upp. Luckily they feel it is so easy to roll it in, that they can start the engine and drive home, but they can always hope that tomorrow we have the optimal 10 to 16 knots of wind from a proper direction so they can sail for a while. - Lauri Tarkkonen |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bowsprit, another bad idea from the past. I have had more time on
older "dangerous" boats than I do on square riggers and the comparison is just as pertinent. I am not sure whether being a competent sailor is useful at all if it just means knowing how to use antique hardware and arcane tasks. Surely being self sufficient and knowledgeable is a good thing but at what expense? There are many old fashioned things we might spend time learning about but we dont. How many kids today could set the points on an older car? I've spent a lot of time on certain "thrilling" sports but have always been happy to give up old fashioned ways for more modern safer ones. I even learned how to use a GPS. My peculiarity about paper charts concerns aesthetics, not safety. Once again, do it your way but I assure you that this idea of being a competent seaman is about as useful as being competent with a buggywhip. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Advice on Sails | General | |||
Underwater sails? | Boat Building | |||
Main halyard winch, 1sp. or 2sp? | Cruising | |||
Problems replacing main halyard - advice? | General | |||
$#%~#^%@ Halyard piston Shackle Lanyard! | Cruising |