Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in
: Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? Yep. The diode only conducts when the field in the coil of the relay collapses, when you turn the power to it off. The diode is reverse biased (+ power to its banded cathode end, - power to its anode) when the relay is energized. You had it connected up backward, zapping the diode to a short. Oops.... +12-------coil----------12 | | --|-- band noband |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Roger Long" wrote in : Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? Yep. The diode only conducts when the field in the coil of the relay collapses, when you turn the power to it off. The diode is reverse biased (+ power to its banded cathode end, - power to its anode) when the relay is energized. You had it connected up backward, zapping the diode to a short. Oops.... +12-------coil----------12 | | --|-- band noband Not clear. Fuse is blown but one would have to check to see if the diode is blown. Suppression diodes are generally rugged little things. They may well last long enough to blow the fuse without going out. There are only a zillion or two diodes launched in this application. I don't think I would use a solenoid or a relay without one. If worried get a bigger diode. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope. It was a dead short. I'm putting in the 10 ohm / .01 mfd
suppressors instead. -- Roger Long |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger,
You can do that if you want to, but diodes work better. You may still get a spike on the line with the RC setup, but that won't matter to anything but the electronics. The RC set does what it does by thying to limit the rate of rise when the switch opens, but the diode makes the power from the widing stay in the winding. That is why little DIN (automotive default these days) relays are marked 87 for signal and 31 for ground. Newer cars have a lot of this stuff going on. Matt Colie Roger Long wrote: Nope. It was a dead short. I'm putting in the 10 ohm / .01 mfd suppressors instead. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting point. I can wire the diodes on the outside of my
controller just as easily as the snubber. If I do see any evidence of spikes, I'll do that. For future reference, do you know which diodes to use? I foolishly tossed the ones I cut out of the sockets. It's unlikely I'll see a problem though. The water will probably only get to the high switch in our boat if the stuffing box hose splits. If the boat is unattended, the minimal electronics we have will be off. Mostly, this system will be operated by picking up one of the float switches when checking the bilge. The most used feature of it will be not having to hang down there holding the switch until the bilge empties. Just being able to flip it up and forget it will be worth all the effort I put into it. Operating in that mode, the relay never engages. -- Roger Long "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Roger, You can do that if you want to, but diodes work better. You may still get a spike on the line with the RC setup, but that won't matter to anything but the electronics. The RC set does what it does by thying to limit the rate of rise when the switch opens, but the diode makes the power from the widing stay in the winding. That is why little DIN (automotive default these days) relays are marked 87 for signal and 31 for ground. Newer cars have a lot of this stuff going on. Matt Colie Roger Long wrote: Nope. It was a dead short. I'm putting in the 10 ohm / .01 mfd suppressors instead. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry W4CSC wrote:
"Roger Long" wrote in : Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? Yep. The diode only conducts when the field in the coil of the relay collapses, when you turn the power to it off. The diode is reverse biased (+ power to its banded cathode end, - power to its anode) when the relay is energized. You had it connected up backward, zapping the diode to a short. Oops.... +12-------coil----------12 | | --|-- band noband I'm confused. Perhaps this is why I left hardware engineering for software. I thought the purpose of a diode was to pass current one way, and block it the other. Did this fail because the passed current was too high, or because the blocked voltage was too high? Or is there something else I'm missing? Should a small resistor have been put in series? Is the coil storing up too much energy? Why can't everything just be digital? While I'm on the subject, since I have twin engines, some of my instruments, such as the fuel gauge are fed by the key switch from one engine. Is there a way to hook up 2 diodes to allow either feed to work/ Radio Shack part numbers please ;-) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Comments below:
"Jeff" wrote in message ... Larry W4CSC wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in : Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? Yep. The diode only conducts when the field in the coil of the relay collapses, when you turn the power to it off. The diode is reverse biased (+ power to its banded cathode end, - power to its anode) when the relay is energized. You had it connected up backward, zapping the diode to a short. Oops.... +12-------coil----------12 | | --|-- band noband I'm confused. Perhaps this is why I left hardware engineering for software. I thought the purpose of a diode was to pass current one way, and block it the other. Did this fail because the passed current was too high, or because the blocked voltage was too high? Or is there something else I'm missing? Simple answer, explained elsewhere, repeated here. Roger hooked his new sump pump system to a test battery to test it, but unfortunately connected the battery backwards (+ where - should have been). The diodes (two pumps, two relays, two diodes) normally would have blocked the 12 v. from the battery and passed only the reverse current from the collapsing relay coil field when the circuit opened. Instead, because the polarity of the circuit was reversed, the diode passed the full current available from the battery, essentially, the diode was a dead short accross the battery, so the diode(s) burned up and shorted itself (themselves) permanently. Rodger won't do that again I'll bet. Should a small resistor have been put in series? Is the coil storing up too much energy? Why can't everything just be digital? While I'm on the subject, since I have twin engines, some of my instruments, such as the fuel gauge are fed by the key switch from one engine. Is there a way to hook up 2 diodes to allow either feed to work/ Radio Shack part numbers please ;-) Yes, two diodes, arranged in a Y, each diode feeding power from each key switch coming together, then feeding power to the instruments you want to continue to operate with only one engine on. The diodes need to be rated at a high enough wattage (volts x amps = watts) to pass enough current to operate the instruments. There will be a slight voltage drop across the diodes so you may experience lower than expected readings on the instruments. -- Ken Heaton & Anne Tobin Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote in :
I'm confused. Perhaps this is why I left hardware engineering for software. I thought the purpose of a diode was to pass current one way, and block it the other. Did this fail because the passed current was too high, or because the blocked voltage was too high? When he hooked it up backwards, the diode was forward biased straight across the battery's terminals. Current went through the roof, welding the junction to a short which, microseconds later, blew the fuse. Once welded to a short, unless you can really melt the mounting, it stays a short....across the coil, not in series with it. It's a short both ways at that point. This diode's function is to short the relay's coil when the coil's field collapses, producing inductive kick which forward biases the diode for a few milliseconds each time power is removed from the coil. Otherwise, the inductive kick, which could be several hundred volts for a few microseconds like the spark from an ignition coil, could destroy the control electronics or switch contacts which arc each time it is de-energized. With the diode in place, inductive kick produces .6v pulses, the forward bias voltage of the diode as it sinks the kick's power current pulse. Or is there something else I'm missing? Should a small resistor have been put in series? No, as the diode is normally REVERSE biased by the applied power. I doesn't conduct except for that little kick of the coil at de-energization. Is the coil storing up too much energy? Why can't everything just be digital? It is digital...(c; 1 = relay on.....0 = relay off...but it's not hexidecimal..making it harder for a software man to comprehend...hee hee. While I'm on the subject, since I have twin engines, some of my instruments, such as the fuel gauge are fed by the key switch from one engine. Is there a way to hook up 2 diodes to allow either feed to work/ Radio Shack part numbers please ;-) Any 1 amp, 50V piv or higher rectifier will work.....for this OR circuit...(c; Hook the anodes of the diodes, one to each power switch on each engine. Hook the cathodes (banded end) together to the common power + lead to each fuel guage. If either engine is turned on, its diode will conduct turning on both fuel guages. (classic OR gate - DDL logic!) engine 1----------------||---------\ \ \ engine 2----------------||------------\-----------fuel guage + Circuit may be too simple for mainframe engineers...(c; |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry W4CSC wrote:
Jeff wrote in : I'm confused. Perhaps this is why I left hardware engineering for software. I thought the purpose of a diode was to pass current one way, and block it the other. Did this fail because the passed current was too high, or because the blocked voltage was too high? When he hooked it up backwards, the diode was forward biased straight across the battery's terminals. Current went through the roof, welding the junction to a short which, microseconds later, blew the fuse. Once welded to a short, unless you can really melt the mounting, it stays a short....across the coil, not in series with it. It's a short both ways at that point. Thanks. The aspect that eluded me was that the dead short to ground would pass "infinite" current until something popped, like the breakers. Most circuits with diodes, such as rectifiers, have some resistance implied elsewhere. This diode's function is to short the relay's coil when the coil's field collapses, producing inductive kick which forward biases the diode for a few milliseconds each time power is removed from the coil. Otherwise, the inductive kick, which could be several hundred volts for a few microseconds like the spark from an ignition coil, could destroy the control electronics or switch contacts which arc each time it is de-energized. With the diode in place, inductive kick produces .6v pulses, the forward bias voltage of the diode as it sinks the kick's power current pulse. Yup. Subtle things like that I tend to remember. Its only the obvious that I forget. .... Why can't everything just be digital? It is digital...(c; 1 = relay on.....0 = relay off...but it's not hexidecimal..making it harder for a software man to comprehend...hee hee. I beg your pardon. I'm software from the "old school," as in front panel lights and flipping switches to install bootstraps and debug. I still have the front panel from the first computer I owned - a Data General Nova 1200. http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/dg-nova.html And since I came from the "mini" world, I learned Octal long before Hex. While I'm on the subject, since I have twin engines, some of my instruments, such as the fuel gauge are fed by the key switch from one engine. Is there a way to hook up 2 diodes to allow either feed to work/ Radio Shack part numbers please ;-) Any 1 amp, 50V piv or higher rectifier will work.....for this OR circuit...(c; Hook the anodes of the diodes, one to each power switch on each engine. Hook the cathodes (banded end) together to the common power + lead to each fuel guage. If either engine is turned on, its diode will conduct turning on both fuel guages. (classic OR gate - DDL logic!) engine 1----------------||---------\ \ \ engine 2----------------||------------\-----------fuel guage + Circuit may be too simple for mainframe engineers...(c; Thanks. It looks too obvious for me. Ken mentioned that the voltage drop could affect the gauges. I can see how the cheap fuel gauge might have a problem but it made me wonder if the water temp gauges would be affected. Not that I would need the diodes for them, but the alternator output can vary from 12 something (turned off) to 14.5, depending on what's going on in the regulator's little mind. I have to believe that such fluctuations don't make much of a difference in the temp readout, but I couldn't find a spec on the Teleflex site that indicated they were stable over a reasonable voltage range. Any thoughts? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Comment below:
"Jeff" wrote in message ... Larry W4CSC wrote: Jeff wrote in : chunks of stuff snipped for brevity Ken mentioned that the voltage drop could affect the gauges. I can see how the cheap fuel gauge might have a problem but it made me wonder if the water temp gauges would be affected. Not that I would need the diodes for them, but the alternator output can vary from 12 something (turned off) to 14.5, depending on what's going on in the regulator's little mind. I have to believe that such fluctuations don't make much of a difference in the temp readout, but I couldn't find a spec on the Teleflex site that indicated they were stable over a reasonable voltage range. Any thoughts? I haven't seen a schematic for boat instrument systems but will make a comment on how automotive instrument systems used to work. (They may still work this way, but I haven't been around this stuff for years) Automotive instrument systems (used to) receive their 12 V. + feed from a simple voltage regulator mounted in the dashboard wiring system. This prevented the varying voltage coming from the alternator from causing erratic readings on the instruments. Automotive gauges at the time were thermal in operation (because they were much cheaper to build that way), and so were sensitive to voltage variation. You could tell good instruments (usually aftermarket) from these thermal types when you turned the ignition switch on. Good ones would snap to the indicated reading, the thermal ones would take a few seconds to rise up to the correct indication. Gas gauges would often not give a true reading of tank level until you started the motor and the alternator kicked in. Again, I'm not sure if boat gauges are wired this way. -- Ken Heaton, Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mercury Mark 58,piston question | General | |||
Friday Ethics Question | General | |||
Winterizing question plus. | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
Transom Height - Dumb Question Alert | General |