Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Diode question for Brian or Larry
I got my bilge pump controller put together and it looks pretty neat.
It will fit right under the fuse panel I put in and the relay can be easily pulled and replace. I tested it and my portable 12 V battery immediately gave the "Tink" that means the fuse blew. I checked and there were zero ohms across the terminals to the relay coil. I put this together very carefully so it was hard to believe I had a short. When I opened it up to look, I noticed that the suppression diode across the coil had burned into the wire slightly. I cut it and the short disappeared. I then cut the suppression diodes out of both relay sockets. There was no + or - indication on the relay wiring but one of the coil wires was red. Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? -- Roger Long |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Roger Long wrote:
I got my bilge pump controller put together and it looks pretty neat. It will fit right under the fuse panel I put in and the relay can be easily pulled and replace. I tested it and my portable 12 V battery immediately gave the "Tink" that means the fuse blew. I checked and there were zero ohms across the terminals to the relay coil. I put this together very carefully so it was hard to believe I had a short. When I opened it up to look, I noticed that the suppression diode across the coil had burned into the wire slightly. I cut it and the short disappeared. I then cut the suppression diodes out of both relay sockets. OOPS There was no + or - indication on the relay wiring but one of the coil wires was red. Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? YES, wrong polarity would put a massive current through the diode. Overcurrent is the quickest way to destroy a diode I know. Thhe usual failure mode for a diode is dead short unless you put enough current through it to physically rupture the package, when the short may change to an open circuit. As you have found, this results in total pump failure because the supply fuse has blown. :-( Removing the diodes is the correct thing to do. As you have now removed the protection they offered the switches and contacts, fit a snubber circuit across each relay coil. Snubbers are not polarity sensitive. It will work without them but for how long? They are not exactly expensive or difficult to fit. Can you clarify that the diodes were ONLY in the sockets, not inside the relays? At the moment I am concerned that if you plug in a replacement relay *with* a diode if the system is giving trouble, you may instantly blow the fuse rendering the pump totally dead. Relays with diodes usually have some polarity marking on the coil terminals. May just be a red dot, a tiny plus sign or even a circuit diagram showing the coil and the diode with pin numbers. Occasionally you get one that you have to read the manufacturer's databook to confirm it has a diode. -- Ian Malcolm. London, ENGLAND. (NEWSGROUP REPLY PREFERRED) ianm[at]the[dash]malcolms[dot]freeserve[dot]co[dot]uk [at]=@, [dash]=- & [dot]=. *Warning* HTML & 32K emails -- NUL: 'Stingo' Albacore #1554 - 15' Early 60's, Uffa Fox designed, All varnished hot moulded wooden racing dinghy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yes the diodes were in the sockets. It makes sense then that the
relay had no polarity markings because it itself is not polarity sensitive. The red wire on the socket should have tipped me off but that's the problem with staying up late at night working on this stuff Here's a picture of the finished controller: http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Bilge.htm#Controller The diodes are way too sensitive a component to have buried inside a critical system box like this. I have the snubber components and will build them this morning. There is now nothing inside the box but wiring. Even if both relays should go bad, I can jumper a wire across the terminals to get the system pumping. I'll mark the box with the appropriate jumper location just in case. Thanks, (I should have included you in my header.) -- Roger Long "Ian Malcolm" wrote in message ... Roger Long wrote: I got my bilge pump controller put together and it looks pretty neat. It will fit right under the fuse panel I put in and the relay can be easily pulled and replace. I tested it and my portable 12 V battery immediately gave the "Tink" that means the fuse blew. I checked and there were zero ohms across the terminals to the relay coil. I put this together very carefully so it was hard to believe I had a short. When I opened it up to look, I noticed that the suppression diode across the coil had burned into the wire slightly. I cut it and the short disappeared. I then cut the suppression diodes out of both relay sockets. OOPS There was no + or - indication on the relay wiring but one of the coil wires was red. Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? YES, wrong polarity would put a massive current through the diode. Overcurrent is the quickest way to destroy a diode I know. Thhe usual failure mode for a diode is dead short unless you put enough current through it to physically rupture the package, when the short may change to an open circuit. As you have found, this results in total pump failure because the supply fuse has blown. :-( Removing the diodes is the correct thing to do. As you have now removed the protection they offered the switches and contacts, fit a snubber circuit across each relay coil. Snubbers are not polarity sensitive. It will work without them but for how long? They are not exactly expensive or difficult to fit. Can you clarify that the diodes were ONLY in the sockets, not inside the relays? At the moment I am concerned that if you plug in a replacement relay *with* a diode if the system is giving trouble, you may instantly blow the fuse rendering the pump totally dead. Relays with diodes usually have some polarity marking on the coil terminals. May just be a red dot, a tiny plus sign or even a circuit diagram showing the coil and the diode with pin numbers. Occasionally you get one that you have to read the manufacturer's databook to confirm it has a diode. -- Ian Malcolm. London, ENGLAND. (NEWSGROUP REPLY PREFERRED) ianm[at]the[dash]malcolms[dot]freeserve[dot]co[dot]uk [at]=@, [dash]=- & [dot]=. *Warning* HTML & 32K emails -- NUL: 'Stingo' Albacore #1554 - 15' Early 60's, Uffa Fox designed, All varnished hot moulded wooden racing dinghy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Roger Long wrote:
Yes the diodes were in the sockets. It makes sense then that the relay had no polarity markings because it itself is not polarity sensitive. The red wire on the socket should have tipped me off but that's the problem with staying up late at night working on this stuff Well I reckon you'll learn to get some sleep before working on expensive/critical stuff (if possible). :-) Here's a picture of the finished controller: http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Bilge.htm#Controller Nice to see the end result. The diodes are way too sensitive a component to have buried inside a critical system box like this. Its not that they are very sensitive, its their rather unpleasant failure mode. :-( This was why I and others were encouraging you to use snubbers instead. One can design them in safely but that can get way too technical for all except denisons of sci.electronics.design or similar 'wire headed' hangouts. :-) I have the snubber components and will build them this morning. There is now nothing inside the box but wiring. Even if both relays should go bad, I can jumper a wire across the terminals to get the system pumping. I'll mark the box with the appropriate jumper location just in case. Couple of spare relay going in your spares kit I hope. Might as well make up the jumper wire with appropriate ends and keep it taped to the box. Thanks, (I should have included you in my header.) No worries. B.T.W., I am off sailing for a while so wont be able to offer any more feedback. -- Ian Malcolm. London, ENGLAND. (NEWSGROUP REPLY PREFERRED) ianm[at]the[dash]malcolms[dot]freeserve[dot]co[dot]uk [at]=@, [dash]=- & [dot]=. *Warning* HTML & 32K emails -- NUL: 'Stingo' Albacore #1554 - 15' Early 60's, Uffa Fox designed, All varnished hot moulded wooden racing dinghy. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Roger Long" wrote in
: Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? Yep. The diode only conducts when the field in the coil of the relay collapses, when you turn the power to it off. The diode is reverse biased (+ power to its banded cathode end, - power to its anode) when the relay is energized. You had it connected up backward, zapping the diode to a short. Oops.... +12-------coil----------12 | | --|-- band noband |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Roger Long" wrote in : Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? Yep. The diode only conducts when the field in the coil of the relay collapses, when you turn the power to it off. The diode is reverse biased (+ power to its banded cathode end, - power to its anode) when the relay is energized. You had it connected up backward, zapping the diode to a short. Oops.... +12-------coil----------12 | | --|-- band noband Not clear. Fuse is blown but one would have to check to see if the diode is blown. Suppression diodes are generally rugged little things. They may well last long enough to blow the fuse without going out. There are only a zillion or two diodes launched in this application. I don't think I would use a solenoid or a relay without one. If worried get a bigger diode. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nope. It was a dead short. I'm putting in the 10 ohm / .01 mfd
suppressors instead. -- Roger Long |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Roger,
You can do that if you want to, but diodes work better. You may still get a spike on the line with the RC setup, but that won't matter to anything but the electronics. The RC set does what it does by thying to limit the rate of rise when the switch opens, but the diode makes the power from the widing stay in the winding. That is why little DIN (automotive default these days) relays are marked 87 for signal and 31 for ground. Newer cars have a lot of this stuff going on. Matt Colie Roger Long wrote: Nope. It was a dead short. I'm putting in the 10 ohm / .01 mfd suppressors instead. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting point. I can wire the diodes on the outside of my
controller just as easily as the snubber. If I do see any evidence of spikes, I'll do that. For future reference, do you know which diodes to use? I foolishly tossed the ones I cut out of the sockets. It's unlikely I'll see a problem though. The water will probably only get to the high switch in our boat if the stuffing box hose splits. If the boat is unattended, the minimal electronics we have will be off. Mostly, this system will be operated by picking up one of the float switches when checking the bilge. The most used feature of it will be not having to hang down there holding the switch until the bilge empties. Just being able to flip it up and forget it will be worth all the effort I put into it. Operating in that mode, the relay never engages. -- Roger Long "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Roger, You can do that if you want to, but diodes work better. You may still get a spike on the line with the RC setup, but that won't matter to anything but the electronics. The RC set does what it does by thying to limit the rate of rise when the switch opens, but the diode makes the power from the widing stay in the winding. That is why little DIN (automotive default these days) relays are marked 87 for signal and 31 for ground. Newer cars have a lot of this stuff going on. Matt Colie Roger Long wrote: Nope. It was a dead short. I'm putting in the 10 ohm / .01 mfd suppressors instead. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Larry W4CSC wrote:
"Roger Long" wrote in : Did I blow the diode by hooking up with reverse polarity? Yep. The diode only conducts when the field in the coil of the relay collapses, when you turn the power to it off. The diode is reverse biased (+ power to its banded cathode end, - power to its anode) when the relay is energized. You had it connected up backward, zapping the diode to a short. Oops.... +12-------coil----------12 | | --|-- band noband I'm confused. Perhaps this is why I left hardware engineering for software. I thought the purpose of a diode was to pass current one way, and block it the other. Did this fail because the passed current was too high, or because the blocked voltage was too high? Or is there something else I'm missing? Should a small resistor have been put in series? Is the coil storing up too much energy? Why can't everything just be digital? While I'm on the subject, since I have twin engines, some of my instruments, such as the fuel gauge are fed by the key switch from one engine. Is there a way to hook up 2 diodes to allow either feed to work/ Radio Shack part numbers please ;-) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mercury Mark 58,piston question | General | |||
Friday Ethics Question | General | |||
Winterizing question plus. | General | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | General | |||
Transom Height - Dumb Question Alert | General |