Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard
or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting
your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final
"word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen

Sorry. You have to make a contribution to a newsgroup before you have the right to
complain. If this is all you have to offer, you're no better than jaxie.

On the other hand, if you have some interesting experience to talk about, or even some
questions to ask, please feel free to post.


"Pete Tatro" wrote in message
...
Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.

jeffies, *you* don't qualify by *your* definition, unless of course you define
"contribution" such that is includes utter bullsquat.

[did you pass this squat below by your wife _before_ you posted it, or did she
clout you about the ears once again?]

From: "Jeff Morris"
Date: 10/20/2004 5:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Sorry. You have to make a contribution to a newsgroup before you have the
right to
complain. If this is all you have to offer, you're no better than jaxie.

On the other hand, if you have some interesting experience to talk about, or
even some
questions to ask, please feel free to post.


"Pete Tatro" wrote in message
...
Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.

peetro, try this instead for all your information on everything in the world:

www.yoyo.com

From: "Pete Tatro"
Date: 10/20/2004 5:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard
or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting
your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final
"word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen

ubject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: "Pete Tatro"
Date: 10/20/2004 14:04 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-

Sure.....it's called "killfiles".

However, before you rush to use it, consider.......

1. He's usually entertaining and good for a laugh.
2. He usually sticks to making an ass of himself on boating related subjects
(unlike the idiots who post about politics, religion, sports, etc.).
3. He has, obviously, limited knowledge and experience in boating and related
issues (note how he must always try and relate airplanes and the FAA to
technical questions and is not too familiar with the duties and
responsibilities of the Corp and USCG), but this can be an advantage, as many
are willing to point out his obvious errors which can frequently explain an
issue to lurkers such as yourself.
4. Did I mention he's amusing?
5. Etc.

Shen

besides, you can always depend on shenne not understanding two out of every
three words written, and him claiming that is enough for 1000% understanding of
the subject.

From: (Shen44)
Date: 10/20/2004 11:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

ubject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: "Pete Tatro"
Date: 10/20/2004 14:04 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-

Sure.....it's called "killfiles".

However, before you rush to use it, consider.......

1. He's usually entertaining and good for a laugh.
2. He usually sticks to making an ass of himself on boating related subjects
(unlike the idiots who post about politics, religion, sports, etc.).
3. He has, obviously, limited knowledge and experience in boating and related
issues (note how he must always try and relate airplanes and the FAA to
technical questions and is not too familiar with the duties and
responsibilities of the Corp and USCG), but this can be an advantage, as many
are willing to point out his obvious errors which can frequently explain an
issue to lurkers such as yourself.
4. Did I mention he's amusing?
5. Etc.

Shen

JAXAshby wrote:
besides, you can always depend on shenne not understanding two out of every
three words written, and him claiming that is enough for 1000% understanding of
the subject.


There you go again.

and hoary his genius as a junior in high school in the use of words (look how
he confuses "lock" with "gate"), and twenty foot waves on the Chesepeake.

From: Harry Krause
Date: 10/21/2004 7:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

JAXAshby wrote:
besides, you can always depend on shenne not understanding two out of every
three words written, and him claiming that is enough for 1000%
understanding of
the subject.


There you go again.

Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)


besides, you can always depend on shenne not understanding two out of every
three words written, and him claiming that is enough for 1000% understanding
of
the subject.


LOL Well, Doodles, if we're talking about me not understanding two out of every
three words "YOU" write, I'm probably not alone as two out of every three word
"YOU" write are totally unrelated to the subject, immaterial, or nonsensical at
best.
The remaining one in three of your words, wouldn't make a coherent post, no
matter how you slung them together.

Shen

shen tells the world he can not keep up with a three digit IQ conversing in
sixth grade lingo thusly:

From: (Shen44)
Date: 10/21/2004 12:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)


besides, you can always depend on shenne not understanding two out of every
three words written, and him claiming that is enough for 1000% understanding
of
the subject.


LOL Well, Doodles, if we're talking about me not understanding two out of
every
three words "YOU" write, I'm probably not alone as two out of every three
word
"YOU" write are totally unrelated to the subject, immaterial, or nonsensical
at
best.
The remaining one in three of your words, wouldn't make a coherent post, no
matter how you slung them together.

Shen