Big point. If the Canal/lock is owned and maintained by the County, then the
Corp has no first hand interest, responsibility, or knowledge of said "lock".

Big point. If the Canal/lock is owned and maintained by the County, then the
Corp (sic) has no first hand interest, responsibility, or knowledge of said
"lock".


Corps, as well as the CG, makes specific mention of the canal, and specifically
states there is a "gate" there but not a lock.

maybe the Corps and the CG each believe a lock is used to move a boat from a
body of water at one level to a body of water at another, while a gate is used
to stop water flowing in one direction or the other.

but what do they know?

Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 10/18/2004 18:50 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Big point. If the Canal/lock is owned and maintained by the County, then the
Corp (sic) has no first hand interest, responsibility, or knowledge of said
"lock".


Corps, as well as the CG, makes specific mention of the canal, and
specifically
states there is a "gate" there but not a lock.

maybe the Corps and the CG each believe a lock is used to move a boat from a
body of water at one level to a body of water at another, while a gate is
used
to stop water flowing in one direction or the other.

but what do they know?


Doodles, some bad news for you..... What the Corps or USCG think or say, is NOT
"the word according to God".
If they don't consider it a "lock" ..... whoopdeedoo. There opinion is about as
important or valid..... as yours (and we know that ain't worth cowpies).
In all the arguments, I see you've never considered NOAA .... is that because
you think the USCG is the one who makes the charts and Coast pilot, or is that
because they sprecht differently?
In truth, amateur mariner dumb butt, if someone wishes to call it a lock, then
waddahey .... itsa lock.

You really do need to return to the home for some "meds adjustment"

Shen

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard or the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting your
express permission.

From: (Shen44)
Date: 10/18/2004 10:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 10/18/2004 18:50 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Big point. If the Canal/lock is owned and maintained by the County, then
the
Corp (sic) has no first hand interest, responsibility, or knowledge of said
"lock".


Corps, as well as the CG, makes specific mention of the canal, and
specifically
states there is a "gate" there but not a lock.

maybe the Corps and the CG each believe a lock is used to move a boat from a
body of water at one level to a body of water at another, while a gate is
used
to stop water flowing in one direction or the other.

but what do they know?


Doodles, some bad news for you..... What the Corps or USCG think or say, is
NOT
"the word according to God".
If they don't consider it a "lock" ..... whoopdeedoo. There opinion is about
as
important or valid..... as yours (and we know that ain't worth cowpies).
In all the arguments, I see you've never considered NOAA .... is that because
you think the USCG is the one who makes the charts and Coast pilot, or is
that
because they sprecht differently?
In truth, amateur mariner dumb butt, if someone wishes to call it a lock,
then
waddahey .... itsa lock.

You really do need to return to the home for some "meds adjustment"

Shen

Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final "word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen

shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final "word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen

Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby)


shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:


LOL How you come up with that conclusion is beyond me...... course, it helps
explain......nah, your conclusions are beyond explanation.
Toodles Doodles.

Is there a way I could subscribe to this news net without JACKASS (excuse
me, I meant JAXAshby)-- It would cut down on the amount of time required to
download an update by 50%, and cut down on the bullcrap by 90%.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
shen finally says he is wrong, but he chews on his words doing it thusly:

right, yo-yo. whatever was either -- let alone both -- the Coast Guard
or
the
Army Corps of Engineers thinking? obviously you need to inform each and
both
that they are to never again make any statements without first getting
your
express permission.

Now Doodles, if "you" wish to believe that the CG or Corp is the final
"word"
in all things waterborne, please feel free to do so.
All you have to do, is realize that not all of us are so limited in our
thinking, as yourself.

Shen