KLC Lewis wrote:
"Keith Nuttle" wrote in message
...
If you know of another disposal method for the 3 billion tons Carbon
Dioxide that is proposed to be captured from of coal fired energy plants
please post to the group so we all will know. Don't just say I don't know
what I am talking about.

There is one other way to handle it but that will create 7 billion
tons/year of metal salts that will have to be treated as toxic waste for
eternity. This could be more depending on the metal they used to react
with the carbon dioxide.

I have a degree in Chemistry and worked in the chemical industry for many
years so know my chemistry. I know federal disposal regulations for
chemical disposal. Can you tell me the educational basis for your
comments?

The current method of sequestering co2 is to pump it into underground
chambers left empty from oil deposits. A more long-term solution would be to
create calcium carbonate by pumping it through lime slurry, or use it to
grow simple plants (algaes) and create more oxygen, trapping the carbon in
the plants' cellulose. The algaes can then feed people and animals, and be
used as fertilizer for other food crops.

You can use 8 billion tons per year is this way?

What are you going to do with the lime slurry?

"Keith Nuttle" wrote in message
...
KLC Lewis wrote:
"Keith Nuttle" wrote in message
...
If you know of another disposal method for the 3 billion tons Carbon
Dioxide that is proposed to be captured from of coal fired energy
plants please post to the group so we all will know. Don't just say I
don't know what I am talking about.

There is one other way to handle it but that will create 7 billion
tons/year of metal salts that will have to be treated as toxic waste for
eternity. This could be more depending on the metal they used to react
with the carbon dioxide.

I have a degree in Chemistry and worked in the chemical industry for
many years so know my chemistry. I know federal disposal regulations
for chemical disposal. Can you tell me the educational basis for your
comments?

The current method of sequestering co2 is to pump it into underground
chambers left empty from oil deposits. A more long-term solution would be
to create calcium carbonate by pumping it through lime slurry, or use it
to grow simple plants (algaes) and create more oxygen, trapping the
carbon in the plants' cellulose. The algaes can then feed people and
animals, and be used as fertilizer for other food crops.

You can use 8 billion tons per year is this way?

What are you going to do with the lime slurry?

The lime sets when exposed to CO2, becoming an inert rock. You can use it
for any number of things (see link below), or nothing at all -- just dump it
into empty rock quarries if you like. As for how much can be sequestered
this way, I don't know and I don't much care. The numbers sound enormous
only because we are so tiny when compared with the Earth itself. And when
you get right down to it, I think the whole issue is a crock. The Earth is
quite resilient, and more than capable of dealing with our miniscule CO2
output. But turning "pollution" into something useful makes more sense than
not, IMO.

http://www.hemtecusa.com/Lime_Facts.html
--
KLC Lewis

Irrefutable photographic proof of alien visitations!
www.KLCLewisStudios.com

--
KLC Lewis

Irrefutable photographic proof of alien visitations!
www.KLCLewisStudios.com


--
KLC Lewis

Irrefutable photographic proof of alien visitations!
www.KLCLewisStudios.com

Sorry about the triple sig on that one. That's what I get for trying to
avoid top-posting.

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:08:46 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:

A more long-term solution would be
to create calcium carbonate by pumping it through lime slurry, or use it

Bull****. That lime is produced by removing the carbon dioxide from
calcium carbonate, and dumping it into the atmosphere. You turn
limestone into limestone, and you dump a lot more carbon powering the
useless process. Net loss, by the ammount of heat required to bake the
carbonate to the oxide.

Casady