LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,869
Default Website for Beneteau 35s5

"Joe" wrote in message ...
OK Nellie, What's a better upwind rig for a 79 ftr with 50K lbs of
cargo? Not that I will give much merit to your opinion knowing you are
sitting on a mooring squaking about a boom repaired with old sewer
pipe that you said is "Better than original"



Let's get serious here before you waste your money and your dream on such an ill-conceived design. I checked your web site out where you had sketch drawings for you schooner that had a container on deck amidships. Dumb! Just plain dumb! You're trying to turn a sailing ship into a motorized container ship. Stupid and dysfunctional. You don't want that kind of weight on deck on a sailboat. You want in as low as possible to act as ballast.

So please redesign that abortion so the container can be lowered into the bilge amidship with some kind of waterproof sliding deck doors to cover it all up. I know why you're thinking two-masted schooner because with the container on deck amidship there is no room for a mast there.

Think out of the box boy. The main mast can double as a cargo boom. The mast can be a bipod set amidship with a roller furling main sail. A traditional Marconi rig would be best for upwind work but a bipod mast with boomless roll up mainsail would to the weatherly job almost as well. You could even consider a ketch sailplain though not as efficient upwind it is better on a reach.

Rightful place?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3260/...3687758d_o.jpg
USCG must be wrong huh Nellie girl?

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/65/16...ecb6fa.jpg?v=0
Cool pilot house huh?

http://www.tweemastschoener.nl/
A bit to fancy


Ugly and they have no place on a sailboat. And the Coast Guard knows nothing about boats. Didn't they just have to recall several dozen of their latest cutters because of **** poor design?

So retard....many fine sailing ships have a pilot house. I know that's
not a priority for a putz like you who sits on the same mooring ball
for 15 plus years and watches the world go by on a 20 something ft day
sailor, but for sailor who might put 16 hours a day on the wheel it's
nice.


See what 'nice' got you on "Red Cloud." I maintain had you been using an outside helm you would not have tried to continue to bash your way to weather. You would have turned tail and run before it (prior to destroying your rudder linkage) like you should have had you been able to gauge the true force of the elements. You have to be outside for this.

You would have not met schedule but you would not have sunk your vessel either. And it's all because you were sequestered in your 'comfy' pilot house. Ask yourself what is more important. Being comfortable or being safe?


Wilbur Hubbard
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Website TEAM ABN AMRO out of the air, but supporter website still on the air Ferdy A. Rozenberg ASA 2 January 15th 07 03:47 PM
Beneteau 35s5 vs. Express 30 Capt. Rob ASA 10 July 17th 06 11:31 AM
Cracked gelcoat on Beneteau 35s5 Capt. Neal® ASA 2 November 3rd 05 02:52 AM
Cracked gelcoat on Beneteau 35s5 Capt. Neal® ASA 0 November 2nd 05 11:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017