Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is also some concern that the newer, light-weight, higher-rpm diesels
won't have the same longevity as older, heavier, slower-turning varieties. I'm not sure how this works out in practice. I have also been under the same impression as some others in this thread, that diesels are so much more expensive than gas engines that unless you're using the boat commercially - heavy, regular use, day after day - that it will be many, many years until the fuel savings catch up with your capital costs. The sometimes controversial Pascoe (www.yachtsurvey.com/GasDiesel.htm) favors gas engines for "smaller" boats. A friend of mine has a 34-foot semi-planing boat with gas engines, and he says that when he bought it new about 15 years ago, the __upgrade__ cost for diesels was $50K (CDN)!!! ==== Charles T. Low - remove "UN" www.boatdocking.com/BDPhoto.html - Photo Contest www.boatdocking.com www.ctlow.ca/Trojan26 - my boat ==== "DSK" wrote in message ... Rod McInnis wrote: In general, a diesel engine weighs a lot more than a gas engine of the same horsepower. 30 years ago, that was true. Now I don't think the weight difference is all that much, unless of course you're talking about comparing Rotax engines... I don't think they put diesels in ultralight planes yet ![]() In this case, the specifics are in the last issue of Soundings, I believe they gave the engine weights. IIRC there was not much difference in engine weights, although the diesels were of slightly less HP they had more torque and a much wider power band. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
power vs sail | Cruising | |||
Evinrude FICHT beats out Yamaha in JD Powers survey | General | |||
Engine News from Genmar | General | |||
Engine options....decisions, decisions, decisions.... | General | |||
Usage of motoroil | General |