Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Atkins & Hoyle Ltd.
Joe wrote:
.... So Ben, Jeff's a pretty sharp sailor, I doubt he would fib on your davit being flawed I hope you contacted him and offered to pay for the flaw. And now RingMaster is having problems getting parts. I haven't heard from Mr. Atkins - he would have to contact me through this forum. Frankly, since the event was about 12 years ago, I don't expect anything now. At the time I felt a bit forgiving - perhaps something had happened while I wasn't there (that was the claim of A&H: if I didn't see it bend, I can't prove it was their fault), perhaps the dink was too big (but it worked for the following several years with no trouble, why would it fail in the slip?), perhaps it really did cost $280 to replace one tube. I only got ****ed later when I expected a bit of sympathy but was laughed at. I'm surprised when vendors don't realize that bit of "attitude" can be very costly. A year or so before the davit incident I talked to the Nonsuch president and sales manager at a show. I asked if certain new features could be retro-fitted to my boat, and rather than explaining why it would not be cost effective, they laughed, said "buy a new boat" and turned away. What they didn't know was that my real reason for being there was to talk to them about the possibility of upgrading to a Nonsuch 36, which would have been a big sale for a then foundering company. But in that moment, I thought, "no way in Hell I'll buy from these Bozos." As fate would have it, Prout was showing some catamarans at the show, and being primed for a change of heart, my long range plans took a different tack that day. |
#32
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Atkins & Hoyle Ltd.
jeff wrote in :
Joe wrote: ... So Ben, Jeff's a pretty sharp sailor, I doubt he would fib on your davit being flawed I hope you contacted him and offered to pay for the flaw. And now RingMaster is having problems getting parts. I haven't heard from Mr. Atkins - he would have to contact me through this forum. Frankly, since the event was about 12 years ago, I don't expect anything now. At the time I felt a bit forgiving - perhaps something had happened while I wasn't there (that was the claim of A&H: if I didn't see it bend, I can't prove it was their fault), perhaps the dink was too big (but it worked for the following several years with no trouble, why would it fail in the slip?), perhaps it really did cost $280 to replace one tube. I only got ****ed later when I expected a bit of sympathy but was laughed at. The reason that I replaced my original set of A&H davits was because they were too small and deforming. Static loading rates mean nothing when you're in rough seas and pounding away. My dinghy weighs about 110 lbs. My old set of davits had a rating of 120 lbs per davit. The new set is rated for 300 lbs per davit. You probably need at least that 5x safety factor. And you definately need to have the dinghy securely attached to the davits so that it doesn't swing/sway/etc. It's taken me years to get my bridle system correct. I think that davit companies do a dis-service to themselves by their load ratings. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org |
#33
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Atkins & Hoyle Ltd.
It's funny someone mentions "attitude" in an earlier post. I always
found the "attitude" of the A&H people sent to man the booth at the Annapolis boat show quite disturbing. I was blown off twice by these front line people. Once when I balked at the price of their little cardboard framed screens for opening ports and another time when the girl laid the pitch on me that they only deal direct because that allows them to keep their prices down. She only had a flip answer when I then asked why they were more expensive than their competition who sold thru a traditional dealer network. |
#34
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Atkins & Hoyle Ltd.
Geoff Schultz wrote:
.... The reason that I replaced my original set of A&H davits was because they were too small and deforming. Static loading rates mean nothing when you're in rough seas and pounding away. I agree completely. In my case, the davit failed in the slip; in fact I think it was before it had ever left the slip. The replacement served 3-4 years before we sold the boat, including some severe conditions, though not off-shore storm conditions. My dinghy weighs about 110 lbs. My old set of davits had a rating of 120 lbs per davit. The new set is rated for 300 lbs per davit. You probably need at least that 5x safety factor. Does that mean that the "120 lb davits" can only handle a dinghy that weighs 24 pounds? Or is it 48 pounds? In either case, there aren't too many that light. Frankly, I'm glad my current boat has a massively overbuilt bench/davit system. And you definately need to have the dinghy securely attached to the davits so that it doesn't swing/sway/etc. It's taken me years to get my bridle system correct. I think that davit companies do a dis-service to themselves by their load ratings. Yes. The picture of the 1200 (which I think is what I had) shows a soft dink with a 6 hp engine. The "safe lifting load" for the pair is listed as 180 lbs. My dink is about 100 lbs, perhaps a bit more with the oars, etc, but I don't carry an engine. One problem is that the price escalates quickly for even a small increase in the "safe" load: $950 for 180 lbs, $1590 for 200 lbs, $1990 for 275lbs. For a proper offshore boat, heavier is definitely better, but for a 30 foot coastal cruiser, the small set should be enough. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1936 22' William Atkins gaff rigged sloop | ASA | |||
FS: Atkins Design 40ft wood hull sloop in Tampa Bay Florida | Marketplace |