[[email protected]]

wrote:
There is a new word in the lexicon for failed sailors such as Wayne
and Dougboat. They are SAILURES

You mean like this?
http://data.sailboatowners.com/photos/1225650723.jpg

cavelamb himself wrote:
Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?


Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

[cavelamb himself[_4_]]

wrote:

wrote:

There is a new word in the lexicon for failed sailors such as Wayne
and Dougboat. They are SAILURES


You mean like this?
http://data.sailboatowners.com/photos/1225650723.jpg

cavelamb himself wrote:

Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?



Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King




et tu, Doug?

--

Richard

(remove the X to email)

[[email protected]]

Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?


wrote:
Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.


cavelamb himself wrote:
et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK

[[email protected]]

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?


wrote:
Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.


cavelamb himself wrote:
et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK

Starting to get the picture about Dougy, Cavelamb?

[cavelamb himself[_4_]]

wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), wrote:


Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?

wrote:

Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.

cavelamb himself wrote:

et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK


Starting to get the picture about Dougy, Cavelamb?



I'm wondering about a whole lot of people on the net these days.

WAY too many people acting out in ways that wouldn't be accepted in person.

It's getting to the point of diminishing returns.

--

Richard

(remove the X to email)

[[email protected]]

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:03:27 -0600, cavelamb himself
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), wrote:


Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?

wrote:

Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.

cavelamb himself wrote:

et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK


Starting to get the picture about Dougy, Cavelamb?



I'm wondering about a whole lot of people on the net these days.

WAY too many people acting out in ways that wouldn't be accepted in person.

It's getting to the point of diminishing returns.

Think of usenet as a giant sandbox. g

[cavelamb himself[_4_]]

wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:03:27 -0600, cavelamb himself
wrote:


wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), wrote:



Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?

wrote:


Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.

cavelamb himself wrote:


et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK


Starting to get the picture about Dougy, Cavelamb?



I'm wondering about a whole lot of people on the net these days.

WAY too many people acting out in ways that wouldn't be accepted in person.

It's getting to the point of diminishing returns.


Think of usenet as a giant sandbox. g


If you mean that as in a giant catbox, I'd probably agree...



--

Richard

(remove the X to email)

[Bruce in Bangkok[_9_]]

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?


wrote:
Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.


cavelamb himself wrote:
et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK


Of course, because he is terrified that someone will discover who he
is. One of the causes of his insufficient ego is the fact that he is a
coward.

Try e-mailing the address he posts for a reply to see how brave he is
- "mail can't be delivered"

Cheers,

Bruce
(bpaige125atgmaildotcom)

[[email protected]]

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:18:08 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?


wrote:
Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.


cavelamb himself wrote:
et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK


Of course, because he is terrified that someone will discover who he
is. One of the causes of his insufficient ego is the fact that he is a
coward.

Try e-mailing the address he posts for a reply to see how brave he is
- "mail can't be delivered"

Cheers,

Bruce
(bpaige125atgmaildotcom)

Nice try Bangcock, but no cigar!

[Bruce in Bangkok[_9_]]

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:10:35 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:18:08 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Why are you so big on putting people down, Dog?


wrote:
Because he's a bitter little man who has never accomplished much.

He seems to have learned to not stalk people on the internet, though.


cavelamb himself wrote:
et tu, Doug?


Well, *he* started it. And he's a lot more hurt by the truth than I am
by
his slander. For example, you might consider asking Saltie/Krusty/BB
why he's changed his ID so many times.

DSK


Of course, because he is terrified that someone will discover who he
is. One of the causes of his insufficient ego is the fact that he is a
coward.

Try e-mailing the address he posts for a reply to see how brave he is
- "mail can't be delivered"

Cheers,

Bruce
(bpaige125atgmaildotcom)

Nice try Bangcock, but no cigar!



to
date Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:32 AM
subject Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:



Technical details of permanent failu
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
other server returned was: 550 550 5.7.1 Unable to deliver to


Cheers,

Bruce
(bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom)