Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 6:43*am, "Steve Lusardi" wrote:
I have no idea what tree you have been living in, but your idea makes no sense. In the first place wet exhaust manifolds for the VW diesel are readily available from Pathfinder Engines and others. The modern VW diesel makes in excess of 100 HP, not 52. Dry exhausts are a real fire hazard and an unecessary risk. Keel cooling is a very good idea and is more common in fresh water than salt, however you will still require a 5 liter or so expansion tank. Steve wrote in message ... Hello all, * I have just purchased an older Starcraft 18' runabout that currently has a 120hp 4cyl Merc gas engine coupled to a series 120 Merc I/O drive. *I intend to convert this package, using the I/O, to diesel using a 52hp 1.6L VW diesel engine in place of the merc 4 cyl. Due to the relative unavailability (and cost) of a wet exhaust, I intend to use a dry stack, and run the diesel with a radiator normally found in the VW vehicles...side mounted and all tucked into a rear engine box that will be manufactured to allow adequate breathing and heat dissipation. *My question is regarding the pump system in the I/ O...can I just remove the impeller, or should I direct its output into an open circuit back into the bay? *Does the pump in the I/O have any cooling or lubricating capacity for the unit? This project is intended to provide for a work boat used in Coos Bay, Oregon, for non commercial fishing and crabbing. *Reliability and economy of use are considerations.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, Steve, the tree I live in is the one behind my machine shop. The reason that I will not put a wet stack on the boat does, in part, involve the 488 pounds that the British Company sells them for (I don't know how much that is in real money, but suspect it is in excess of $1000US). Secondly, I have a few of the 1.6L diesels in my inventory, and as I will not water ski behind the boat, I think 52hp is adequate to my task, and more reliable and fuel efficient to boot (I've rebuilt ten of these little engines in the past 5 years)...In fact, if I had one of the newer diesels available to me, I would still use the 52hp model. As the boat (18' open runabout, aluminum hull) will be both trailered and occasionally beached on sand bars, and as I don't want to pierce the hull or transom to build a cooling system, the close-coupled radiator system mounted on the injector pump side of the motor looks like a viable method, and the system's entire footprint will be less than 32" wide....Oh, did I mention that this was to be a work boat? What I am looking for is reliability, safety and fuel efficiency...speed, resale value, and the approbation of the boating community are not issues. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mercruiser 470 alternator conversion | General | |||
Mercruiser diesel I/Os | General | |||
Diesel drivetrain conversion | Boat Building | |||
Mercruiser 3.0 >>> V-8 Conversion... | General | |||
4.3L Diesel conversion | General |