Glenn Ashmore ) wrote:
: Depends on the design. Plywood is generally cheaper and faster than
: strip but you can develop more complex shapes with strip. Also it
: depends on the design but both can be built equally strong. While some
: hulls are still built in traditional strip most are sheathed in
: fiberglass these days.


Glenn is correct, as far as he goes. He could go further. There is
virtually no design that can be created--sensibly--in either ply or strip.

Strip is much, much slower, harder, labor intensive, and depending upon
technique. Ply is dead easy, faster, and flatter.


If the same boat can be built in both, then it should be built in ply,
unless your head is in the clouds, your time is on your hands, and your
money is flowing out your wallet.

They are different techniques, and they are for different applications.
Generally, these days, stripping is for amateurs to apply to complex
shapes, or professionals to make very beautiful hulls (amateurs, too).

If it can be built in plywood, it should, as compared to strip.

Thanks Chris,

Your information is good becaue it helps me to clarify my thoughts
that were getting all confused. I had information like that of half an
ama being strip planked in a day and things like that.

However I started to do some costings, timber cost per sqr unit area,
epoxy cost per sqr unit area and ply was coming out cheaper.

Plus am not intending to make a superfast dream machine, just a simple
1 person trimaran to sail around the coast. (to everyone Please,
Please, Please dont send links to boats that would 'suit' me).

Thanks again,

N. Peter Evans