| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
new hull planking method (possibly)....long
Hi
Rodney Myrvaagnes wrote in message . .. On 30 Jul 2004 02:02:45 -0700, (Per Corell) wrote: Hi Perhaps a language problem? In any case, it is hard to see how one usenet group could ruin your opportunity to build boats. No , and as I acturly had been building many, the reson to instantly bully any new prototype any new concept also surprised me at start, but you se when I interduced the idea of full/scale develobed panels. made as one large roll of paper ready to display mount onto whatever sheet material ----- I found one danish caravan factory that sold 3mm. ,one nice side ,ready made glasfiber sheet white gelcoat at very low cost, ----- but what it seemed, was that the actural concept and the difference from tradisional scaled down plans ,the fact that here was somthing that was not the tradisional trouble of re-calculating and upscaling to even transfere to just a building jig, where I offered the actural panels in full-scale drawings ready to cut from the lines, ---- this was seemed to be the actural offence. An offence towards those at that time maby 50 or 70 year old designs found in P.M and simular , even anyone shuld think that it would be more obvious to support a real living and innovative boat designer that proved skills develobing exiting new design tools, ----- but try go back as you say yourself ; first pfull-scale plans was no good even a few years the jokers interduced them as their own invention, then full-scale plans was no good as the paper would scrink in moisture even then with scaled planes and paper the foult would be ten fold, but ontop and even I showed both a load of acturly build boats, and scaled models, then even a scale model wasn't a prove of nothing even that's what boatbuilders allway's used. --------- Anyway the 3D-Honeycomb method at the same time got the FAA aproval and was pointed to as "an exiting new innovative method sor small sports and beach planes", so being up against a crowd of fanatics of aincient plywood boat designers didn't bother as much as the obvious harm to a promising new boatbuilding concept, where digital design tools was develobed to the benefit of amature builders but obviously they also made the old fasion plans obsulute, unless you by all means wanted to defend what was not even the noble wooden boat building crafts, but cheap plybox designs 50 year old. I often at those times wondered if it had to do with copyright but acturly it was a battle between somthing that was not the old boatbuilding crafts --- I am acturly a woodenboat builder --- and the obvious options develobing new exiting design tools, guess who won. Anyway the arguments was so hysterical that you had to give up when somone claimed that a 3D model wasn't a "prove" for anything, even a scale model was no use towards an elegant elefant, and I simply gave up ontop the vaste of what shuld be my family's bread. -------- If you check the Cyber-Boat remains you will se some nice designs though ,but the 3D-H method that everyone could have profited from, was not develobed further within the noble boatsbuilding craft, but Im'e not to blame for that. P.C. http://home20.inet.tele.dk/h-3d/index.htm |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 2005 Sea Ray 500 (long) | General | |||
| How thick to make the fairing? & vaccum bagging a hull | Boat Building | |||
| Anyone strip plank an old carvel hull? | Boat Building | |||
| Am I chasing my tail?? | Boat Building | |||
| long vs. extra long shaft | Cruising | |||
Threaded Mode
