Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
"Captain Crunch" wrote in message ... Well, he can now post about his favorite boat. Wonder if he got the log (and cedar bucket) with the purchase? Ya, what's the name of that little boat again...something like "Cut the Cheese," isn't it? |
#42
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:58:58 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote this crap: "Captain Crunch" wrote in message ... Well, he can now post about his favorite boat. Wonder if he got the log (and cedar bucket) with the purchase? Ya, what's the name of that little boat again...something like "Cut the Cheese," isn't it? I think it was, "pass the salt." I'm Horvath and I approve of this post. |
#43
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
What do you think? If this is real and not some imagined adventure, I think you can sell tickets. I doubt you can recoup the cost of the boat, though. |
#44
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
"Paul Cassel" wrote in message . .. Wilbur Hubbard wrote: What do you think? If this is real and not some imagined adventure, I think you can sell tickets. I doubt you can recoup the cost of the boat, though. I think people will pay. Did you know it costs about 100,000 dollars to climb Everest? They have a waiting list for guided climbs. Few people are foolish enough to try climbing Everest on their own. There are, indeed, lots of rich bored people around these days. Some are already paying millions of dollars a pop for a ride into space and back for a couple days. I figure to sail a hurricane and enjoy the ultimate survival adventure rich people would be willing to pay maybe 20 thousand dollars - for a one week cruise. Let's say six passengers - that makes 120 grand a hurricane, if there are eight reachable hurricanes a season that would be almost a million dollars the first year alone. Of course there will be expenses but two years should be the break-even point for the build barring unforeseen circumstances. Wilbur Hubbard |
#45
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:14:30 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Paul Cassel" wrote in message ... Wilbur Hubbard wrote: What do you think? If this is real and not some imagined adventure, I think you can sell tickets. I doubt you can recoup the cost of the boat, though. I think people will pay. Did you know it costs about 100,000 dollars to climb Everest? They have a waiting list for guided climbs. Few people are foolish enough to try climbing Everest on their own. There are, indeed, lots of rich bored people around these days. Some are already paying millions of dollars a pop for a ride into space and back for a couple days. I figure to sail a hurricane and enjoy the ultimate survival adventure rich people would be willing to pay maybe 20 thousand dollars - for a one week cruise. Let's say six passengers - that makes 120 grand a hurricane, if there are eight reachable hurricanes a season that would be almost a million dollars the first year alone. Of course there will be expenses but two years should be the break-even point for the build barring unforeseen circumstances. Wilbur Hubbard A word to the wise ain't necessary, it's the stupid ones who need the advice. - Bill Cosby: Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) |
#46
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
On Aug 16, 9:24 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: Yes, cruising catamarans have something extra. As a simple Google and YouTube search using capsize and catamaran will reveal, the something extra is the remarkable ease with which catamarans turn turtle. With this in mind, any potential catamaran buyer must ask himself if the paltry advantages of a catamaran - things such as small heel angles, slightly faster speeds downwind, more elbow room below (but not load carrying capacity), shallow draft and largish cockpit - outweigh the fact that sooner or later the whole shebang is going to end up upside-down and swamped. Don't even think about what happens if you get trapped under the thing and drown. Just think about upside-down. In other words, everything is ruined. Why put up with a boat that has a designed-in flaw of being more stable upside-down than rightside-up? Is the trade-off between a platform that doesn't heel quite as much and an upside-down platform worth it? Only you can answer that question. It depends upon how much you love your life and the lives of your loved ones. I wonder when the Coast Guard is going to get some balls and declare any and all cruising catamaran ocean voyages "manifestly unsafe voyages" and put a stop to them? Wilbur Hubbard Sir I think you are confusing racing cats and lightweight hobby cats with cruising cats, Cruising cats again and again have proven to be more stable than a monohull and I am a fan of the monohull. The appears to be more space in a cruising cat but this is an illusion as it is just more cramped spaces and more of them, but if you need to know the truth on cats go to http://www.tennantdesign.co.nz/ Malcolm is one of the world's leading marine architects on catamarans. then you can speak with authority, check out the technical details and the record of CRUISING CATS . David Law |
#47
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
wrote in message ups.com... On Aug 16, 9:24 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Yes, cruising catamarans have something extra. As a simple Google and YouTube search using capsize and catamaran will reveal, the something extra is the remarkable ease with which catamarans turn turtle. With this in mind, any potential catamaran buyer must ask himself if the paltry advantages of a catamaran - things such as small heel angles, slightly faster speeds downwind, more elbow room below (but not load carrying capacity), shallow draft and largish cockpit - outweigh the fact that sooner or later the whole shebang is going to end up upside-down and swamped. Don't even think about what happens if you get trapped under the thing and drown. Just think about upside-down. In other words, everything is ruined. Why put up with a boat that has a designed-in flaw of being more stable upside-down than rightside-up? Is the trade-off between a platform that doesn't heel quite as much and an upside-down platform worth it? Only you can answer that question. It depends upon how much you love your life and the lives of your loved ones. I wonder when the Coast Guard is going to get some balls and declare any and all cruising catamaran ocean voyages "manifestly unsafe voyages" and put a stop to them? Wilbur Hubbard Sir I think you are confusing racing cats and lightweight hobby cats with cruising cats, Cruising cats again and again have proven to be more stable than a monohull and I am a fan of the monohull. The appears to be more space in a cruising cat but this is an illusion as it is just more cramped spaces and more of them, but if you need to know the truth on cats go to http://www.tennantdesign.co.nz/ Malcolm is one of the world's leading marine architects on catamarans. then you can speak with authority, check out the technical details and the record of CRUISING CATS . David Law Thanks but the bottom line is the stability curve. That says it all as far as I'm concerned. Cruising cats have stability curves similar to racing cats at the top of the curve where it says, "oh oh, turn turtle because there's no going back." Since they are heavier, the bottom of the curve looks a little better but that's spurious information because it's at the top where the problem arises. Anybody who claims cruising cats have an impeccable record are not familiar with the facts. People have died when their cruising cats have turned turtle. People will continue to die. The various manufacturers have an aggressive plan to cover up any incidents of capsize. They'd rather people weren't aware of the fact that they are selling a dangerous product. A product of dubious worth when it comes to ocean voyaging where sometimes one just cannot avoid a survival storm. Wilbur Hubbard |
#48
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
* Wilbur Hubbard wrote, On 8/19/2007 9:25 PM:
Thanks but the bottom line is the stability curve. That says it all as far as I'm concerned. In other words, you've made up your mind to ignore the reality of the situation. Cruising cats have stability curves similar to racing cats at the top of the curve where it says, "oh oh, turn turtle because there's no going back." Since they are heavier, the bottom of the curve looks a little better but that's spurious information because it's at the top where the problem arises. There is no doubt that there is a similarity. The issue, however, is that magnitude of the wind/wave required to capsize, the frequency of this happening, and the record of survival when it does occur. Anybody who claims cruising cats have an impeccable record are not familiar with the facts. I've never claimed the record is "impeccable," only that its hard to find cases where a modern cruising cat has capsized while cruising, as opposed to racing or delivery. And please show us your "facts," not just fabricated nonsense. People have died when their cruising cats have turned turtle. People will continue to die. Very, very few. You still haven't provided a single case, although I know of a few. And since its trivial to find cases where monohulls have disappeared without a trace, its not clear what your point is. The various manufacturers have an aggressive plan to cover up any incidents of capsize. Ah! So its a conspiracy! Next you'll claim the Martians are abducting catamaran sailers! They'd rather people weren't aware of the fact that they are selling a dangerous product. And they must have fooled the insurance companies too, because the rates for a cat aren't any higher than for a monohull. A product of dubious worth when it comes to ocean voyaging where sometimes one just cannot avoid a survival storm. Unlike the large number of monohulls that would politely disappear during any storm that would capsize a cruising cat. And since you never leave sight of land, why the great interest in ocean voyaging? |
#49
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:56:50 -0400, Jeff wrote:
any storm that would capsize a cruising cat. Perhaps you are underestimating to ability of a fool to do the wrong thing at the wrong time. All the big ships will capsize, and not come back. The self righting vessels are actually rare. During a wartime crossing the Queen Mary came within a degree or so of going over. Wave took out the wheelhouse windows, ninety feet above sea level. Nothing except a submarine is immune to big waves. Of course, those things routinely recover from sinking. I heard that ten thousand shipping containers are lost, during storms, every year. Hit one of those with many small craft, and you may not be concerned with capsizing. Casady |
#50
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Catamarans have something extra....
On Aug 20, 9:25 am, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Aug 16, 9:24 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Yes, cruising catamarans have something extra. As a simple Google and YouTube search using capsize and catamaran will reveal, the something extra is the remarkable ease with which catamarans turn turtle. With this in mind, any potential catamaran buyer must ask himself if the paltry advantages of a catamaran - things such as small heel angles, slightly faster speeds downwind, more elbow room below (but not load carrying capacity), shallow draft and largish cockpit - outweigh the fact that sooner or later the whole shebang is going to end up upside-down and swamped. Don't even think about what happens if you get trapped under the thing and drown. Just think about upside-down. In other words, everything is ruined. Why put up with a boat that has a designed-in flaw of being more stable upside-down than rightside-up? Is the trade-off between a platform that doesn't heel quite as much and an upside-down platform worth it? Only you can answer that question. It depends upon how much you love your life and the lives of your loved ones. I wonder when the Coast Guard is going to get some balls and declare any and all cruising catamaran ocean voyages "manifestly unsafe voyages" and put a stop to them? Wilbur Hubbard Sir I think you are confusing racing cats and lightweight hobby cats with cruising cats, Cruising cats again and again have proven to be more stable than a monohull and I am a fan of the monohull. The appears to be more space in a cruising cat but this is an illusion as it is just more cramped spaces and more of them, but if you need to know the truth on cats go to http://www.tennantdesign.co.nz/ Malcolm is one of the world's leading marine architects on catamarans. then you can speak with authority, check out the technical details and the record of CRUISING CATS . David Law Thanks but the bottom line is the stability curve. That says it all as far as I'm concerned. Cruising cats have stability curves similar to racing cats at the top of the curve where it says, "oh oh, turn turtle because there's no going back." Since they are heavier, the bottom of the curve looks a little better but that's spurious information because it's at the top where the problem arises. Anybody who claims cruising cats have an impeccable record are not familiar with the facts. People have died when their cruising cats have turned turtle. People will continue to die. The various manufacturers have an aggressive plan to cover up any incidents of capsize. They'd rather people weren't aware of the fact that they are selling a dangerous product. A product of dubious worth when it comes to ocean voyaging where sometimes one just cannot avoid a survival storm. Wilbur Hubbard WIlbur this is easily settled put your money where your mouth is, name 3 people who have died and name the manufacturer of the cat, and show how it caused their deaths. As you want them banned just go for it. you seem to know the facts please enlighten us, but beware some of the manufacturers have deep pockets and big lawyers. Why do some manufacturers of cats claim unsinkability ? which Pleasure cats have turned turtle due to the design or due to the captain taking them to hard, is it design or education? How come most of the southern hemisphere Australia and New Zealand there is a preference for cats, an their not sailed or motored in sheltered waters. Why did not all the polynesians die out it was the only boat they knew? to many questions and as for the conspiracy well I wasn't on the grassy knoll . you mean all these competing manufacturers said "hey guys lets not tell anyone this is unsafe" and the thousands of employees and all the staff never mentioned it to anyone untill you discovered it WOH !!! ELEMENTARY DEAR WATSON ! look at these guys http://www.trawlercatmarine.com/whatisnew.html and go tell them they are dangerous as all their range goes round the world, tell them it won't. Regards David |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Catamarans have something extra.... | Cruising | |||
Anyone Need Extra $$$$$ | General | |||
Wharram Catamarans | ASA | |||
Catamarans ? | ASA | |||
want some extra cash, try this | Cruising |