Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
"KLC Lewis" wrote in
et: "Ed Gordon" wrote in message 8... "KLC Lewis" wrote in et: It would be dumb to sail back. What they'd be doing is more like a delivery captain trip. Have two adverturesome young men sail down each taking a Mac26M and sailing in company for safety. Deliver the boats and make about 20 grand profit or more each. Then fly back to California and do it again. What's an airline ticket cost from Australia to California? Two grand? That's a eighteen grand profit for about a month's work. You could do as many trips as you could during the off season to not run into typhoons. I think you could do six trips a year by flying back. According to sailing instructions it's a downwind milk run from California to Australia. You'd have to cross a bit of doldrums around Hawaii but then you're in the trades and going like all getout right for Australia. Remember how Capt. Bligh went from Tahiti all the way past Australia in an open row boat? It would be a piece of cake in a Mac. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm FWIW, "World Cruising Routes" puts it at 3563 miles from San Diego to Tahiti, non-stop. This alone is in excess of a month of sailing, without landfall, in your Mac. A month's worth of food, water, fuel, etc. This is assuming you make good time and have no delays crossing the ITCZ. Forget about using the ballast tanks for storing drinking water, as you are going to NEED that ballast. And since the vessel is not equipped with light air sails, it would be best to allow at least 45 days for this passage alone, with the distinct possibility that it could take longer. Tahiti to New Zealand is another 2500 miles or so -- in reverse. But you can't go that way. You'll go first to Tonga, then head south. Make it 3000 -- another month. New Zealand to Australia is another 1200 or so, perhaps two weeks. Still think it's doable? We're not even talking about the wear and tear on the "brand new" Mac, or taking time for repairs along the way. Or rest for the crew, or stopping for supplies... It's longer than I thought. How about this? Buy the Macs on the US east coast and then go to Australia via Cape Horn. That way it would be westerly winds the whole way. Just stay on the edge of the roaring 40s so it wouldn't be too rough and it would be a milk run the whole way. One could re-provision in South Africa. Going across the Equator south of the Windwards would be the only light wind area. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
#2
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
Ed Gordon wrote in
8: "KLC Lewis" wrote in et: "Ed Gordon" wrote in message 8... "KLC Lewis" wrote in et: It would be dumb to sail back. What they'd be doing is more like a delivery captain trip. Have two adverturesome young men sail down each taking a Mac26M and sailing in company for safety. Deliver the boats and make about 20 grand profit or more each. Then fly back to California and do it again. What's an airline ticket cost from Australia to California? Two grand? That's a eighteen grand profit for about a month's work. You could do as many trips as you could during the off season to not run into typhoons. I think you could do six trips a year by flying back. According to sailing instructions it's a downwind milk run from California to Australia. You'd have to cross a bit of doldrums around Hawaii but then you're in the trades and going like all getout right for Australia. Remember how Capt. Bligh went from Tahiti all the way past Australia in an open row boat? It would be a piece of cake in a Mac. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm FWIW, "World Cruising Routes" puts it at 3563 miles from San Diego to Tahiti, non-stop. This alone is in excess of a month of sailing, without landfall, in your Mac. A month's worth of food, water, fuel, etc. This is assuming you make good time and have no delays crossing the ITCZ. Forget about using the ballast tanks for storing drinking water, as you are going to NEED that ballast. And since the vessel is not equipped with light air sails, it would be best to allow at least 45 days for this passage alone, with the distinct possibility that it could take longer. Tahiti to New Zealand is another 2500 miles or so -- in reverse. But you can't go that way. You'll go first to Tonga, then head south. Make it 3000 -- another month. New Zealand to Australia is another 1200 or so, perhaps two weeks. Still think it's doable? We're not even talking about the wear and tear on the "brand new" Mac, or taking time for repairs along the way. Or rest for the crew, or stopping for supplies... It's longer than I thought. How about this? Buy the Macs on the US east coast and then go to Australia via Cape Horn. That way it would be westerly winds the whole way. Just stay on the edge of the roaring 40s so it wouldn't be too rough and it would be a milk run the whole way. One could re-provision in South Africa. Going across the Equator south of the Windwards would be the only light wind area. I meant Cape of Good Hope. Sorry. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
#3
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
"Ed Gordon" wrote in message ... I meant Cape of Good Hope. Sorry. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm Ah, well that's a bit different. North America to South Africa is only 7000 miles. Another 12,000 or so might put you in Australia, but it's hard to say. There are no recognised cruising routes from Cape of Good Hope to Australia -- perhaps you could write a book on it? |
#4
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
KLC Lewis wrote:
"Ed Gordon" wrote in message ... I meant Cape of Good Hope. Sorry. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm Ah, well that's a bit different. North America to South Africa is only 7000 miles. Another 12,000 or so might put you in Australia, but it's hard to say. There are no recognised cruising routes from Cape of Good Hope to Australia -- perhaps you could write a book on it? I'd be more willing to try that in my Catalina 18 than a Mac. Sheesh! |
#5
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
cavelamb himself wrote in
. net: KLC Lewis wrote: "Ed Gordon" wrote in message ... I meant Cape of Good Hope. Sorry. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm Ah, well that's a bit different. North America to South Africa is only 7000 miles. Another 12,000 or so might put you in Australia, but it's hard to say. There are no recognised cruising routes from Cape of Good Hope to Australia -- perhaps you could write a book on it? I'd be more willing to try that in my Catalina 18 than a Mac. Sheesh! But the Catalina 18 is relatively worthless in Australia. (or anywhere else I guess) You must have missed the original post where they said a new Mac26M was selling for $75,000 in Australia. That's seems like an opportunity for some young adverturers to make some serious cash and put some spice in their life. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
#6
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
Ed Gordon wrote:
cavelamb himself wrote in . net: KLC Lewis wrote: "Ed Gordon" wrote in message .78... I meant Cape of Good Hope. Sorry. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm Ah, well that's a bit different. North America to South Africa is only 7000 miles. Another 12,000 or so might put you in Australia, but it's hard to say. There are no recognised cruising routes from Cape of Good Hope to Australia -- perhaps you could write a book on it? I'd be more willing to try that in my Catalina 18 than a Mac. Sheesh! But the Catalina 18 is relatively worthless in Australia. (or anywhere else I guess) You must have missed the original post where they said a new Mac26M was selling for $75,000 in Australia. That's seems like an opportunity for some young adverturers to make some serious cash and put some spice in their life. I bought it for a completely different reason - to sail. Not FOR Sale. Sheesh! |
#7
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
"Ed Gordon" wrote in message 8... "KLC Lewis" wrote in et: It's longer than I thought. How about this? Buy the Macs on the US east coast and then go to Australia via Cape Horn. That way it would be westerly winds the whole way. Just stay on the edge of the roaring 40s so it wouldn't be too rough and it would be a milk run the whole way. One could re-provision in South Africa. Going across the Equator south of the Windwards would be the only light wind area. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm Wrong way around Cape Horn in a Mac? A month or more in the roaring 40's and possibly some time in the Furious 50's? Again, going the wrong way? No thanks. While I MIGHT consider rounding Cape Horn in a suitable vessel, I would only want to do it going in the right direction -- west to east. And I am far from convinced that the Mac26 is even close to being a "suitable vessel" for such a crossing. As a business concern, I am assuming you would want to put full coverage insurance on the vessel to protect yourself against total loss. Know any underwriters who will take that gamble on a Mac? Without at least 1 to 1 odds? |
#8
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
"Ed Gordon" wrote in message 8... It's longer than I thought. How about this? Buy the Macs on the US east coast and then go to Australia via Cape Horn. That way it would be westerly winds the whole way. Just stay on the edge of the roaring 40s so it wouldn't be too rough and it would be a milk run the whole way. One could re-provision in South Africa. Going across the Equator south of the Windwards would be the only light wind area. never heard of a shipping container, eh genius? |
#9
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
"Scotty" wrote in
: never heard of a shipping container, eh genius? I saw a picture with a Mac26M inside a shipping container. It fit real good. But it would probably cost ten or twenty grand to ship a Mac to Australia. You could sail it there for probably 500 bucks worth of groceries and drinks. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.freewebs.com/egordon873/index.htm |
#10
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
Mac26X fit for all waters
In article , egordon873
@aol.com says... "Scotty" wrote in : never heard of a shipping container, eh genius? I saw a picture with a Mac26M inside a shipping container. It fit real good. But it would probably cost ten or twenty grand to ship a Mac to Australia. You could sail it there for probably 500 bucks worth of groceries and drinks. Well that's how they ship 'em - to NZ anyway. It's about five grand BTW, IIRC. -- Duncan |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mac26X fit for all waters | Cruising | |||
US federal judge declares boating illegal in all US navigable waters | General | |||
What does it take to enter US waters by boat? | General | |||
Waters Dancing Boat Kits | Touring | |||
Free Boundary Waters Thermal Shirt | Touring |