Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
Bill wrote: My argument is not about fear. I am not saying that I need a gun but rather I need my rights to not be infringed, gun ownership being one of them. If you want to talk about fear how about the fear of guns There is nothing in the Constitution that gives you that "right." http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitut...ml#amendmentii Amendment II A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. one more time to be dramatic: the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Seems pretty clear to me. It's clear when you leave off the first part... "a well regulated militia" doesn't give an individual the right to own a gun unless they're part of a WELL REGULATED militia. I didn't say that at all. I didn't mention you or banning guns at all. Can you read? You've said it repeatedly. I'll let you look it up, since you wrote it. What facts? You have stated none but only your opinions. You have shown no imperical evidence that stricter gun control laws will prevent any crime only what you, a non-expert, think. I am entitled to my opinions, and I believe that at a minimum we need to enforce the laws that currently exist. Fact.. we don't. Fact... you don't have any evidence, except what that you claim to consult to with people who "know." Sorry, but that's not actually a fact. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |