How many more?
 

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Maxprop wrote:



You're joking. There's no where near enough ATF agents to do that.

Halliburton.

Now cut that out! You know that's Jons' word!

Cheers
Marty


Cheney is my word. Or, it is Karl (Actung!) Rove... err, words, whatever.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

How many more?
 

* Maxprop wrote, On 4/19/2007 11:23 AM:
OzOne wrote in message ...

Bill, Collecting and hunting are very different matters and can be
covered in legislation.

They can be, but will they be? Handgun Control, Inc., the preeminent gun
control advocate organization in this country, has a mission statement that
clearly states its desire to see the elimination of ALL guns, not just
handguns. If its goals are ever achieved, there will be no quarter given to
collectors and hunters. This is far and away the primary reason for the
NRA's legislative activities.

Max



More lies from the NRA puppets. Don't you ever get tired of looking
like idiots?

This is from "Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence" (aka Guncontrol,
Inc):

Q. Is Brady a "gun ban" organization? Are you really just trying to
make all guns illegal in America?

Brady believes that a safer America can be achieved without banning
guns. Our stand is simple. We believe that law-abiding citizens should
be able to buy and keep firearms. And we believe there are sensible
gun laws that we can and should insist upon when it comes to gun
ownership.

First and foremost, we should try to keep guns out of the hands of
those who should not have them, including criminals and children.

Second, there are certain classes of weapons that should be out of
bounds for private ownership. They include Saturday-night specials,
which are used almost exclusively for crime, military-style assault
weapons like Uzis and AK-47s, and .50-caliber sniper rifles, which
serve no ordinary sporting purpose.

Third, we believe that those who do own guns ought to be held to the
highest standards of safety. They should be well trained in the use of
their weapons and they should be required to keep weapons secure, so
that neither innocent children nor prohibited persons can get a hold
of them.

How many more?
 

Brilliant Jon,
Care to offer any proof?


The guy who killed 33 people because he had easy access to guns isn't
proof enough?

The murderer didn't kill because he had easy access to guns, he killed
because he was a whacked out nutjob.
Proper intervention by school officials to a known problem could have/would
have prevented this tragedy.

Damn Jon, drop another tab and finish the job.

Regards,
JR



--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
Joe wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:05 pm, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article . com,

Joe wrote:
On Apr 17, 11:30 am, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:

And, they have easy access to guns, especially handguns. If you
remove
that easy access, then they might have a chance to get help before 33
people die needlessly. Why don't you tell us it's "in the
Constitution" again if it makes you feel better.

--
Capt. JG -Hide quoted text -

Wrong

Right.

--
Capt. JG

Brilliant Jon,
Care to offer any proof?


The guy who killed 33 people because he had easy access to guns isn't
proof enough?


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

How many more?
 

"JR" wrote in message
...
Brilliant Jon,
Care to offer any proof?


The guy who killed 33 people because he had easy access to guns isn't
proof enough?

The murderer didn't kill because he had easy access to guns, he killed
because he was a whacked out nutjob.

He killed because he was a nutjob. He was able to kill so many because of
access to guns.
Isn't this obvious?

Proper intervention by school officials to a known problem could
have/would have prevented this tragedy.

Perhaps. And, in conjunction with more limited access to multiple
(especially) guns would have helped also. No guarantees, but both would have
likely helped.


Damn Jon, drop another tab and finish the job.

??

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

How many more?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Maxprop wrote:



You're joking. There's no where near enough ATF agents to do that.

Halliburton.

Now cut that out! You know that's Jons' word!

Cheers
Marty


Cheney is my word. Or, it is Karl (Actung!) Rove... err, words, whatever.

I'll be sure to add those to my vocabulary.

Max

How many more?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

OzOne wrote in message
...

Bill, Collecting and hunting are very different matters and can be
covered in legislation.

They can be, but will they be? Handgun Control, Inc., the preeminent gun
control advocate organization in this country, has a mission statement
that clearly states its desire to see the elimination of ALL guns, not
just handguns. If its goals are ever achieved, there will be no quarter
given to collectors and hunters. This is far and away the primary reason
for the NRA's legislative activities.

Max



Woooo scary. Buy more guns now.

Cheney.

Max

How many more?
 

"Jeff" wrote in message
. ..
* Maxprop wrote, On 4/19/2007 11:23 AM:
OzOne wrote in message
...

Bill, Collecting and hunting are very different matters and can be
covered in legislation.

They can be, but will they be? Handgun Control, Inc., the preeminent gun
control advocate organization in this country, has a mission statement
that clearly states its desire to see the elimination of ALL guns, not
just handguns. If its goals are ever achieved, there will be no quarter
given to collectors and hunters. This is far and away the primary reason
for the NRA's legislative activities.

Max

More lies from the NRA puppets. Don't you ever get tired of looking like
idiots?

This is from "Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence" (aka Guncontrol,
Inc):

Q. Is Brady a "gun ban" organization? Are you really just trying to make
all guns illegal in America?

Brady believes that a safer America can be achieved without banning guns.
Our stand is simple. We believe that law-abiding citizens should be able
to buy and keep firearms. And we believe there are sensible gun laws that
we can and should insist upon when it comes to gun ownership.

First and foremost, we should try to keep guns out of the hands of those
who should not have them, including criminals and children.

Second, there are certain classes of weapons that should be out of bounds
for private ownership. They include Saturday-night specials, which are
used almost exclusively for crime, military-style assault weapons like
Uzis and AK-47s, and .50-caliber sniper rifles, which serve no ordinary
sporting purpose.

Third, we believe that those who do own guns ought to be held to the
highest standards of safety. They should be well trained in the use of
their weapons and they should be required to keep weapons secure, so that
neither innocent children nor prohibited persons can get a hold of them.

This is the only response I'll make to any of your posts, Jeff, primarily
because you can't debate without name-calling.

Handgun Control, Inc. has a mission statement in black and white which
states clearly that they intend to eliminate all guns from public
possession. Whatever they've said subsequently to the media is BS and
inconsistent with their original platform.

Now, go play in the street.

Max

How many more?
 

* Maxprop wrote, On 4/19/2007 7:00 PM:
"Jeff" wrote in message
. ..
* Maxprop wrote, On 4/19/2007 11:23 AM:
OzOne wrote in message
...

Bill, Collecting and hunting are very different matters and can be
covered in legislation.
They can be, but will they be? Handgun Control, Inc., the preeminent gun
control advocate organization in this country, has a mission statement
that clearly states its desire to see the elimination of ALL guns, not
just handguns. If its goals are ever achieved, there will be no quarter
given to collectors and hunters. This is far and away the primary reason
for the NRA's legislative activities.

Max
More lies from the NRA puppets. Don't you ever get tired of looking like
idiots?

This is from "Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence" (aka Guncontrol,
Inc):

Q. Is Brady a "gun ban" organization? Are you really just trying to make
all guns illegal in America?

Brady believes that a safer America can be achieved without banning guns.
Our stand is simple. We believe that law-abiding citizens should be able
to buy and keep firearms. And we believe there are sensible gun laws that
we can and should insist upon when it comes to gun ownership.

First and foremost, we should try to keep guns out of the hands of those
who should not have them, including criminals and children.

Second, there are certain classes of weapons that should be out of bounds
for private ownership. They include Saturday-night specials, which are
used almost exclusively for crime, military-style assault weapons like
Uzis and AK-47s, and .50-caliber sniper rifles, which serve no ordinary
sporting purpose.

Third, we believe that those who do own guns ought to be held to the
highest standards of safety. They should be well trained in the use of
their weapons and they should be required to keep weapons secure, so that
neither innocent children nor prohibited persons can get a hold of them.

This is the only response I'll make to any of your posts, Jeff, primarily
because you can't debate without name-calling.

Handgun Control, Inc. has a mission statement in black and white which
states clearly that they intend to eliminate all guns from public
possession. Whatever they've said subsequently to the media is BS and
inconsistent with their original platform.

Now, go play in the street.

In other words, although the group changed their name and direction
some years ago to be more consistent with the will of the people, you
feel justified in lying about their position.

The game is politics, Max. Groups and parties that want to make a
real change take positions that appeal to a large number of people.
Nowadays, the majority of this country wants consistent gun laws that
prevent kids from driving down to SC and coming back with a trunk full
of guns. The Brady Center has adopted the position the law abiding
citizens should be able to have handguns and hunting weapons, while
criminals and kids should not have easy access to assault weapons.

The obvious problem that the NRA has this position is that the
majority of the country can easily get behind it. Therefore, they
have to convince their dupes that the Brady Center has a hidden agenda
that hearkens back to their earlier incarnation. I see that some
people are buying that.

How many more?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

OzOne wrote in message
...

Bill, Collecting and hunting are very different matters and can be
covered in legislation.

They can be, but will they be? Handgun Control, Inc., the preeminent
gun control advocate organization in this country, has a mission
statement that clearly states its desire to see the elimination of ALL
guns, not just handguns. If its goals are ever achieved, there will be
no quarter given to collectors and hunters. This is far and away the
primary reason for the NRA's legislative activities.

Max



Woooo scary. Buy more guns now.

Cheney.


Pockmarked lawyers... g

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

How many more?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

OzOne wrote in message
...

Bill, Collecting and hunting are very different matters and can be
covered in legislation.

They can be, but will they be? Handgun Control, Inc., the preeminent
gun control advocate organization in this country, has a mission
statement that clearly states its desire to see the elimination of ALL
guns, not just handguns. If its goals are ever achieved, there will be
no quarter given to collectors and hunters. This is far and away the
primary reason for the NRA's legislative activities.

Max



Woooo scary. Buy more guns now.

Cheney.


Pockmarked lawyers... g

Halliburton must produce shotgun shells, too.

Max