In , Rhonda Lea Kirk
said:
: "Kali" wrote in message
:
: In , miguel mjc101
: @gmail.com said:
: Dumbarse Git wrote:
: miguel:
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
:
: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you
: admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of
: ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of
: someone else.
:
: I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago
: said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please
: nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
: beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
: equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said
: award.
:
: If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
: of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the
: word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with
: somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then
: where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is
: cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her
: friend, you might think about stopping yourself.
:
: Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
:
: You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what
: with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want
: to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.
:
: The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to
: be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your
: behalf?
:
: It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
:
: miguel
:
: I didn't mention your full name or your occupation (let alone
: your work location), you filthy kook.
:
: You have serious reading comprehension problems. I've explained
: my position on this very well, and I maintain that position. I
: merely cited an example to make a point. You, being the kooky
: bully you are, saw a threat in it and decided you were going to
: do the same thing, only turn it up a notch. That's what
: narcissistic kooks do.
:
: The more you write, the kookier you seem. You're so bent on your
: kooky mission that you're willing to drag Rhonda through hell
: for it. Say what you want, and have Rhonda try to defend you,
: but kooky is as kooky does. This post is just another example.
:
: He's not responsible for my choices.

His transparent manipulation of you aside...

: You can be sure that I have given careful consideration to all the
: consequences of the position I've taken. More important to me than any
: single person or group of people in this dogfight is whether I will be
: able to look myself in the mirror when I'm done.

Yes, I know this to be true about you.

: Dustin (remember him?) had too little faith in my ability to keep his
: confidence when I refused to choose between him and KMonster. In the
: face of his direct attack on me, I defended myself, but up to that
: point, most of what I said was in Dustin's favor, because in my opinion,
: the tactics being used on him weren't fair or right.
:
: It's not like I'm not consistent, Kali.
:
: If I had to bend myself like a pretzel over this, I wouldn't do it.
: Loyalty to a friend is keeping confidences and offering support in hard
: times, not defending the indefensible.

We agree.

Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/)
wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit
to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If
I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle
from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said
that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you
for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that
your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which
would be your only defense to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word
"dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's
name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the
problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her
participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might
think about stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what
with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to
stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be
acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on
usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks
like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my
identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will
cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

miguel

Kali wrote in
:

In , miguel mjc101
@gmail.com said:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
: Psychology
: (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
: miguel said:
: Dumbarse Git wrote:
: miguel:
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
:
: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
: you admit to in another thread),
:
: You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
: occupation.
:
: I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git.
: If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and
: spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.
:
: yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
: (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.
:
: I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
: ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
: please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
: beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
: equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to
: said award.
:
: If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
: Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
: occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
: has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
: posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
: needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google
: stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping
: yourself.
:
: Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
:
: You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
: what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
: all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.
:
: The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
: to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
: your behalf?
:
: It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
:
: Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
: let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
: unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
: I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
: pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
: realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
: kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.
:
: Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
: Wisconsin-Parkside,
: http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/
:
: Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
: voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
: entertainment out of a bully.
:
: And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
: affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
: hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
: defense of him and wish you'd stop.
:
: I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people
: on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole
: kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my
: identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will
: cause reputational and commercial damage to me.
:
: Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.
:
: You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
: decided to join in. So solly.
:
: miguel

Threat noted.

Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working about two
miles from the little dweeb.

Scare me, mikey!

miguel wrote in
:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to
said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google
stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping
yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people
on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole
kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my
identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will
cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends[slap!]

**** off, you little coward. You like threatening women, wimp? I'll bet
it compensates for the testosterone shots you don't get anymore, nadless.

miguel wrote in
:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to
said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google
stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping
yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people
on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole
kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my
identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will
cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace
to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.

http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel


--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk

COOSN-266-06-58907

Hammer of Thor - August 2005

Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards -
March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007

[Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler

Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
miguel:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),
You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.
I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.
yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.
I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to
said award.
If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google
stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping
yourself.
Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.
The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
your behalf?
It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.
Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/
Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.
And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.
I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people
on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole
kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my
identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will
cause reputational and commercial damage to me.
Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.
You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.
Threat noted.
I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends[slap!]

**** off, you little coward. You like threatening women, wimp? I'll bet
it compensates for the testosterone shots you don't get anymore, nadless.

Look at the nerd gimp retard fagboi puff his chest!

miguel, bite my nuts klunt

miguel wrote in
:

Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
miguel:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/)
wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),
You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.
I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.
yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.
I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
to said award.
If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
stopping yourself.
Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
choice.
The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise
on your behalf?
It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.
Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/
Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.
And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.
I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.
Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.
You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact
you decided to join in. So solly.
Threat noted.
I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends[slap!]

**** off, you little coward. You like threatening women, wimp? I'll
bet it compensates for the testosterone shots you don't get anymore,
nadless.

Look at the nerd gimp retard fagboi puff his chest!

The fag lames won't work. I'm a lesbian, st00pid. So keep trying to
impress me with some more pathetic material the RSPW crowd would laugh
at. I'll try not to laugh too hard[1] at you.

[1] Left in to remind you what a powerless limpdick you are, douchebag.

"Kali" wrote in message

In , Rhonda Lea Kirk
said:
"Kali" wrote in message

In , miguel mjc101
@gmail.com said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of
ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of
someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago
said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please
nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said
award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google
stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping
yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to
be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your
behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

miguel

I didn't mention your full name or your occupation (let alone
your work location), you filthy kook.

You have serious reading comprehension problems. I've explained
my position on this very well, and I maintain that position. I
merely cited an example to make a point. You, being the kooky
bully you are, saw a threat in it and decided you were going to
do the same thing, only turn it up a notch. That's what
narcissistic kooks do.

The more you write, the kookier you seem. You're so bent on your
kooky mission that you're willing to drag Rhonda through hell
for it. Say what you want, and have Rhonda try to defend you,
but kooky is as kooky does. This post is just another example.

He's not responsible for my choices.

His transparent manipulation of you aside...

He was a friend to me when I was being batted around like a cat toy, and
auk was giving out an undeserved Salinger for a troll that did me a lot
of emotional damage.

He has not withdrawn his friendship even though I was quite critical of
him with regard to his initial flaming of you.

Everything he has done with regard to /me/ has been done to my benefit
and advantage. If that's manipulation, I want more of it.

You can be sure that I have given careful consideration to all the
consequences of the position I've taken. More important to me than
any single person or group of people in this dogfight is whether I
will be able to look myself in the mirror when I'm done.

Yes, I know this to be true about you.

Dustin (remember him?) had too little faith in my ability to keep his
confidence when I refused to choose between him and KMonster. In the
face of his direct attack on me, I defended myself, but up to that
point, most of what I said was in Dustin's favor, because in my
opinion, the tactics being used on him weren't fair or right.

It's not like I'm not consistent, Kali.

If I had to bend myself like a pretzel over this, I wouldn't do it.
Loyalty to a friend is keeping confidences and offering support in
hard times, not defending the indefensible.

We agree.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
Psychology, wrote:
miguel said:
Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology
(http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
miguel said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
you admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse
Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth
and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award?
I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about
the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense
to said award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the
google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about
stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your
choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
your behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University
of Wisconsin-Parkside,
http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with
people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having
asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain
get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a
way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me.

Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.

You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
decided to join in. So solly.

Threat noted.

I hope so.

If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are,
frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to
pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the
keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology.

Wow. Extortion attempt.

No.

It's negotiation: Everyone stops.

The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you
should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right
to attempt to mitigate his damages.

Equity is for everyone, Sean.

Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool.
Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance.

http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

"Kali" wrote in message

In , miguel mjc101
@gmail.com said:
Dumbarse Git wrote:
miguel:

Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:

You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you
admit to in another thread),

You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
occupation.

yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
(alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.

I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago
said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please
nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said
award.

If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the
word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with
somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then
where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is
cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her
friend, you might think about stopping yourself.

Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.

You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what
with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want
to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.

The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to
be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your
behalf?

It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.

miguel

Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.

Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
entertainment out of a bully.

And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
defense of him and wish you'd stop.

Kali

I see that we're all aware of the misattribution of up above.

As to most of the rest, I addressed it in a different post, before I saw
this one.

As to my "defense of him," it's more a statement of my ethics. I already
told him quite clearly--publicly--about my disagreement with him over
his flaming of you. For the record, however, I object far more adamantly
to:

Calling him a "dog****er."
The google-stacking.
The revenge froup.
The web page.
The nominations.
The double standards--one for him and one for auk.

scratches head I think something is missing, but that's way more than
enough.

As much as I hate all of this, if you want me to hold him accountable
for retaliating, then accountability will also extend to those acts that
brought about the need to retaliate.

For the record, he has never asked me to take you to task for behavior
he doesn't like, he has not withdrawn his friendship from me because I
was critical of him, he has never intimated to me that you are not my
friend, and he has never accused you of manipulating me.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay