Kali wrote in
:

In , miguel mjc101
@gmail.com said:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of
: Psychology
: (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote:
: miguel said:
: Dumbarse Git wrote:
: miguel:
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
:
: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which
: you admit to in another thread),
:
: You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my
: occupation.
:
: I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git.
: If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and
: spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key.
:
: yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the
: (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else.
:
: I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments
: ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody
: please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
: beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
: equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to
: said award.
:
: If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside,
: Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and
: occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she
: has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their
: posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she
: needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google
: stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping
: yourself.
:
: Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
:
: You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this,
: what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you
: all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.
:
: The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour
: to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on
: your behalf?
:
: It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
:
: Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and
: let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his
: unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry,
: I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past
: pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had
: realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their
: kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests.
:
: Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of
: Wisconsin-Parkside,
: http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/
:
: Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or
: voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making
: entertainment out of a bully.
:
: And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does
: affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you
: hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your
: defense of him and wish you'd stop.
:
: I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people
: on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole
: kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my
: identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will
: cause reputational and commercial damage to me.
:
: Perhaps soon you may miss those days too.
:
: You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you
: decided to join in. So solly.
:
: miguel

Threat noted.

Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working about two
miles from the little dweeb.

Scare me, mikey!