Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
miguel wrote in
: Kali wrote: miguel said: : Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: : Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet : to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to : accomplish. : Good job there kOOk. : miguel So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar. This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity. From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html "Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever make." I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27. Seconds, anyone? Note - To those who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which I've never participated, let it be known that there have been many flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous, unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on cluelessness) as opposed to being based on rational thought. Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today to comprehend a fairly simple argument. First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is fairly understood to mean consequences in meatspace. I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think if somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in momma's basement he ought to possess enough character or courage to say it to somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world consequences, even moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you kookologists who possess the character and courage to abide that standard. I think I've read about one of you who does MMA training at one point or another. The rest of you hide behind your self-serving rule of conduct that serves only to insulate you from any consequences for your bad behavior. Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing so, and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to do so, others of you might be intellectually honest enough to point out the hypocrisy. I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that. It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be objective about this? miguel -- Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk COOSN-266-06-58907 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards - March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007 [Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler |