Thread
:
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
View Single Post
#
31
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.sailing.asa,soc.singles,soc.men
Kali
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 26
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
In , Rhonda Lea Kirk
said:
: "Kali" wrote in message
:
: In , miguel mjc101
: @gmail.com said:
: Dumbarse Git wrote:
: miguel:
:
: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside:
:
: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you
: admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of
: ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of
: someone else.
:
: I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago
: said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please
: nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm
: beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the
: equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said
: award.
:
: If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department
: of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the
: word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with
: somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then
: where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is
: cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her
: friend, you might think about stopping yourself.
:
: Thank you for this very telling campaign speech.
:
: You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what
: with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want
: to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice.
:
: The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to
: be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your
: behalf?
:
: It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization.
:
: miguel
:
: I didn't mention your full name or your occupation (let alone
: your work location), you filthy kook.
:
: You have serious reading comprehension problems. I've explained
: my position on this very well, and I maintain that position. I
: merely cited an example to make a point. You, being the kooky
: bully you are, saw a threat in it and decided you were going to
: do the same thing, only turn it up a notch. That's what
: narcissistic kooks do.
:
: The more you write, the kookier you seem. You're so bent on your
: kooky mission that you're willing to drag Rhonda through hell
: for it. Say what you want, and have Rhonda try to defend you,
: but kooky is as kooky does. This post is just another example.
:
: He's not responsible for my choices.
His transparent manipulation of you aside...
: You can be sure that I have given careful consideration to all the
: consequences of the position I've taken. More important to me than any
: single person or group of people in this dogfight is whether I will be
: able to look myself in the mirror when I'm done.
Yes, I know this to be true about you.
: Dustin (remember him?) had too little faith in my ability to keep his
: confidence when I refused to choose between him and KMonster. In the
: face of his direct attack on me, I defended myself, but up to that
: point, most of what I said was in Dustin's favor, because in my opinion,
: the tactics being used on him weren't fair or right.
:
: It's not like I'm not consistent, Kali.
:
: If I had to bend myself like a pretzel over this, I wouldn't do it.
: Loyalty to a friend is keeping confidences and offering support in hard
: times, not defending the indefensible.
We agree.
Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein
Kali
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Kali