Well, it can't be worse than the 2000+ days of the Bushco administration...
let's see that's a bit more than a dead US soldier per day. Quite a record.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Capt. JG wrote:
I think you're right. Someone should be impeached, but I think it should
be
Cheney. He deserves it more, since Bush basically does whatever he tells
him
to do. Pelosi took impeaching the pres off the table in the best
interests
of the nation, but she didn't take the possible impeachment of the vp off
the table.

Not 100 days dude... 100 HOURS. We'll see as soon as the new Congress is
sworn in.

YYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEE HAWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Get a rope!

Now were going to see some true action, 100 hour!

Good Lord! Dang Skippy start poppin corn.


Joe



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
ps.com...

Capt. JG wrote:
I know he's not going to do it, but he should read Fiasco: The
American
Military Adventure in Iraq, but Thomas Ricks. It's filled with facts
about
why we went and what we're doing. Bascially, the facts support the
proposition that US policy and Bushco in particular did more to fuel
the
insurgency and Al Qaeda than they could have done on their own. It's
quite
an indictement.

If true then the Democrats owe it to the people that elected them to
impeach the President.
Guess we will see in the first "100 days" huh?
Been to any M. Moore flicks lately?

Joe


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Joe wrote:


- - -

If Saddam Gets Nukes, What Will Happen?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... We are talking about now the future of the region.

Now, Saddam gets nuclear weapons, and he has already the
full range of the chemical and most of the range of the bio-
logical probably. ... The expertise are there, all the scientists


Joe, glad to see you're willing to quote from liberal site like
PBS.ORG,
to bad you didn't post the codacil to this interview: "[Editor's
Note,
November 2005: More than two years after the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq,
no evidence has surfaced showing that Saddam Hussein had had the
capability to deploy nuclear weapons. After Saddam's fall, Hamza was
appointed by the Coalition Provisional Authority to be senior
adviser
to
Iraq's Ministry of Science and Technology. In this role, he had
partial
control of Iraq's nuclear and military industries. In March 2004,
Hamza's contract was not renewed. To date, he has not addressed
questions about the failure to find weapons of mass destruction.]"

Hmmm.... I wonder how much else you left out, quoting zealous
refugees
from Saddam's scourge hardly constitutes credible evidence



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/khod...

This link points to nowhere.

Cheers
Marty