Now Oz'es monopoly grain export company AWB faces the loss of its
67-year-old government-sanctioned stranglehold on exports after the
Cole report into the company's $290 million in kickbacks to Iraq this
week recommended possible criminal charges against 11 former executives
and an oil businessman.

Sorry *******s helped Saddam snub his nose at UN sanctions after the
first gulf war. If these traitors did not help Saddam then perhaps the
war would not have been needed. Perhaps sanctions would have worked.

Joe

Bzzzt. Bushco lied about WMDs that he new didn't exist. Oz had nothing to do
with it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Now Oz'es monopoly grain export company AWB faces the loss of its
67-year-old government-sanctioned stranglehold on exports after the
Cole report into the company's $290 million in kickbacks to Iraq this
week recommended possible criminal charges against 11 former executives
and an oil businessman.

Sorry *******s helped Saddam snub his nose at UN sanctions after the
first gulf war. If these traitors did not help Saddam then perhaps the
war would not have been needed. Perhaps sanctions would have worked.

Joe

Capt. JG wrote:
Bzzzt. Bushco lied about WMDs that he new didn't exist. Oz had nothing to do
with it.

Our President was acting on bad intell, he did not lie. You can not
tell a lie unless you know you are not telling the truth. The WMD were
smuggled in Syria

Geeze if countries like OZ spent the 290 million they took in bribes
from Saddam and used that money for intell into WMD then perhaps the
truth would have been discovered sooner.

BTW IMO WMD had nothing to do with the justification of taking out
Saddam

Joe



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Now Oz'es monopoly grain export company AWB faces the loss of its
67-year-old government-sanctioned stranglehold on exports after the
Cole report into the company's $290 million in kickbacks to Iraq this
week recommended possible criminal charges against 11 former executives
and an oil businessman.

Sorry *******s helped Saddam snub his nose at UN sanctions after the
first gulf war. If these traitors did not help Saddam then perhaps the
war would not have been needed. Perhaps sanctions would have worked.

Joe

Our president lied over and over to both the public and to Congress. His
minions fabricated intel and passed it off as fact. Bushco decided that Iraq
had to go, and they used every bit of flimsy evidence they could find to
justify the war and then they went on to subvert our way of life, not to
mention destroying tens of thousand of US soldiers and their family's lives.

Unfortunately, your opinion about why we invaded a country that didn't
attack us nor posed a real threat to us wasn't what drove US policy.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Capt. JG wrote:
Bzzzt. Bushco lied about WMDs that he new didn't exist. Oz had nothing to
do
with it.

Our President was acting on bad intell, he did not lie. You can not
tell a lie unless you know you are not telling the truth. The WMD were
smuggled in Syria

Geeze if countries like OZ spent the 290 million they took in bribes
from Saddam and used that money for intell into WMD then perhaps the
truth would have been discovered sooner.

BTW IMO WMD had nothing to do with the justification of taking out
Saddam

Joe



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Now Oz'es monopoly grain export company AWB faces the loss of its
67-year-old government-sanctioned stranglehold on exports after the
Cole report into the company's $290 million in kickbacks to Iraq this
week recommended possible criminal charges against 11 former executives
and an oil businessman.

Sorry *******s helped Saddam snub his nose at UN sanctions after the
first gulf war. If these traitors did not help Saddam then perhaps the
war would not have been needed. Perhaps sanctions would have worked.

Joe

Blind loyalty to bad leadership is not patriotism.



The Project for the New American Century is a non-profit educational
organization dedicated to a few fundamental propositions: that American
leadership is good both for America and for the world; and that such
leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy and commitment to
moral principle.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

http://www.sundayherald.com/news/int..._president.php

Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President
By Neil Mackay
A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that President
Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure
'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001.

The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a
'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice- president),
Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy),
George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of
staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies,
Forces And Resources For A New Century, was written in September 2000 by the
neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the
Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says: 'The United
States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional
security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate
justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the
Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.' The PNAC
document supports a 'blueprint for maintaining global US pre-eminence,
precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international
security order in line with American principles and interests'.

This 'American grand strategy' must be advanced for 'as far into the
future as possible', the report says. It also calls for the US to 'fight and
decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars' as a 'core
mission'.

The report describes American armed forces abroad as 'the cavalry on
the new American frontier'. The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document
written by Wolfowitz and Libby that said the US must 'discourage advanced
industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a
larger regional or global role'.

The PNAC report also: l refers to key allies such as the UK as 'the
most effective and efficient means of exercising American global
leadership'; l describes peace-keeping missions as 'demanding American
political leadership rather than that of the United Nations'; l reveals
worries in the administration that Europe could rival the USA; l says 'even
should Saddam pass from the scene' bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will
remain permanently -- despite domestic opposition in the Gulf regimes to the
stationing of US troops -- as 'Iran may well prove as large a threat to US
interests as Iraq has'; l spotlights China for 'regime change' saying 'it is
time to increase the presence of American forces in southeast Asia'. This,
it says, may lead to 'American and allied power providing the spur to the
process of democratisation in China'; l calls for the creation of 'US Space
Forces', to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent
'enemies' using the internet against the US; l hints that, despite
threatening war against Iraq for developing weapons of mass destruction, the
US may consider developing biological weapons -- which the nation has
banned -- in decades to come. It says: 'New methods of attack -- electronic,
'non-lethal', biological -- will be more widely available ... combat likely
will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the
world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target'
specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror
to a politically useful tool'; l and pinpoints North Korea, Libya, Syria and
Iran as dangerous regimes and says their existence justifies the creation of
a 'world-wide command-and-control system'.

Tam Dalyell, the Labour MP, father of the House of Commons and one of
the leading rebel voices against war with Iraq, said: 'This is garbage from
right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks -- men who have never seen
the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war. Men like Cheney, who
were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam war.

'This is a blueprint for US world domination -- a new world order of
their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who
want to control the world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime
Minister should have got into bed with a crew which has this moral
standing.'






You should do a search for "Bush + Aranco", "Cheney + Aranco", "Barbara
Administration + Aramco". You'd be surprised.
MMC

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Capt. JG wrote:
Bzzzt. Bushco lied about WMDs that he new didn't exist. Oz had nothing to
do
with it.

Our President was acting on bad intell, he did not lie. You can not
tell a lie unless you know you are not telling the truth. The WMD were
smuggled in Syria

Geeze if countries like OZ spent the 290 million they took in bribes
from Saddam and used that money for intell into WMD then perhaps the
truth would have been discovered sooner.

BTW IMO WMD had nothing to do with the justification of taking out
Saddam

Joe



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Now Oz'es monopoly grain export company AWB faces the loss of its
67-year-old government-sanctioned stranglehold on exports after the
Cole report into the company's $290 million in kickbacks to Iraq this
week recommended possible criminal charges against 11 former executives
and an oil businessman.

Sorry *******s helped Saddam snub his nose at UN sanctions after the
first gulf war. If these traitors did not help Saddam then perhaps the
war would not have been needed. Perhaps sanctions would have worked.

Joe

MMC encourages the following, as all should:

Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President

US global domination
'regime change'
'global Pax Americana'

a 'blueprint for maintaining global US pre-eminence,

'American grand strategy' the US must 'discourage advanced industrial
nations from challenging our leadership 'demanding American political
leadership rather than that of the United Nations';

the creation of 'US Space Forces', to dominate space, and the total
control of cyberspace.

US may consider developing biological weapons
'New methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will
be more widely available ...
combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace,
and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological
warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological
warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool';

North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes justifies the
creation of a 'world-wide command-and-control system'.


'This is a blueprint for US world domination -- a new world order of
their making.

Wow all great ideal MMC thanks for the tips.

The real issues, not MMC anti USA propaganda

the cost of non-intervention was to high with Saddam


The fact Saddam was a totalitarian dictator and that the freedom and
liberty of Iraqis are voided by his continued
dictatorship seems to have escaped the supposed moral concerns of the
French, Germans, Russians, Chinese, and Vatican.


1) 12 years of continued torture, rape, murder, and totalitar-
ianism by Saddam and Saddam's cronies against the
people of Iraq,


2) Saddam's use of biochemical weapons against the Kurds
and Iranians,


3) Saddam's starvation of groups out of favor with the ruling
regime (Marsh Arabs),


4) Saddam's construction of mosques and palaces of enormous
opulence as his people suffered,


5) Saddam's continued development of weapons of mass destruc-
tion,


6) Saddam's alliances with and assistance to likeminded terrorist
entities,


7) Saddam's refusal to cooperate and pro-actively assist the inspec-
tors in a genuine effort to rid itself of weapons of mass destruc-

tion,


8) Saddam's treating his commitments to disarm as burdens to be
avoided rather than as obligations to be fulfilled (disarmament
as a game, rather than as a goal),


9) Saddam's financial support of Palestinian suicider-mass murder-
er organizations in a public display of hatred for human life,


10) Saddam's past atrocities committed against the peoples of
Kuwait and Israel and Iran,


11) Saddam's past efforts to develop nuclear weapons (only
stopped due to Israeli bombing of a nuclear reactor and,
later on, the expulsion of Iraq from Kuwait and the surprising
discovery, thereafter, that Iraq was within two years of devel-
oping nuclear weapons),


12) freedom and liberty for the Iraqi people, a people who have
been bullied and murdered into submission to totalitarianism,


13) defense of the United States, a country vulnerable to attacks
from mass murdering Islamist terrorists who could easily find
succor and WMD from an American-hating tyrant,


14) prevention of the Saddam-Islamist-terrorist goal of a united
Arabia confronting the west (Saddam's goal was a united Arabia
led by Saddam -- Islamists' goal, worldwide conquest led
by a strong leader and the strongest leader in Arabia was
Saddam),


15) reducing the likelihood that Iran will develop nukes by removing
Iran's feeling it must do so to protect against its arch enemy,
Saddam,


16) increasing pressure on Saudi Arabia to deal with the terrorist
elements which are widespread in its midst due to Wahabism,


17) the historical record which clearly demonstrates that pacifism-
appeasement-diplomacy are inept when confronting totalitarian-
ism led by a belligerent and powerful foe -- reference the Treaty

of Versailles and its lack of enforcement by France and Great
Britain as Hitler violated its tenets, re-armed, re-militarized
the
Rhineland, and (unopposed until it was too late) set out to con-
quer most of Europe and Russia, allied with Japan in its effort
to dominate the Far East (an effort which led to the attack on
the U.S. at Pearl Harbor), -and- committed the systematic mass
murder of the handicapped, Jews, homosexual men, and any-
one else opposed to Hitler's tyranny.


^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^


References:


- - -


Is he at war?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl.../synopsis.html

Excerpt: ... In the 10 years since the Gulf War ended,
Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has said that he has
always considered himself at war with America. And
during that time, the U.S. has always considered him
a threat. ...


- - -


Motive:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/mylr...

Excerpt: ... Saddam's view of the utility of violence is
entirely different than ours. ... Saddam sees violence as
something that can achieve his goals. He sees a utility in
violence. In addition, Saddam seeks revenge against the
United States, to do to us what we have done to Iraq. ...


- - -


Primary goal/character (1 of 2):

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...terviews/aburi...

Excerpt: ... Saddam Hussein thinks he talks to god. He has
a message--he has to lead Iraq, make it a model for the Arab
countries and then attract the rest of the Arab countries and
become the sole Arab leader of modern times.


... There is no stopping the man. He always has things in
focus. He never misses a beat. In terms of what the country's
all about, and in terms of where his country fits in the whole
world. ...


- - -


Primary goal/character (2 of 2):

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... Saddam is very vengeful, and Saddam believes
in getting back and attacking. ...


- - -


Saddam and weapons of mass destruction - differing
views of Arabs and Iraqis, generally speaking:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...terviews/aburi...

Excerpt: ... I don't think there was any Arab in the seventies
who did not want Saddam Hussein to have an atomic weapon.
They wanted him to have military parity. Israel had atomic
weapons. The Arabs wanted an Arab country to have atomic
weapons. Iraq was the head of the pack and therefore all
Arabs supported Saddam Hussein. ... I don't think there are
many Arabs at this moment in time ... who do not want Sad-
dam Hussein to have an atomic weapon now.


... there is a division between the vision of Saddam Hussein
that the Iraqis have and the vision of Saddam Hussein the
rest of the Arabs have. To the rest of the Arabs, he is the
man standing up to West. To the Iraqis, he is the man who
dragged us into this state of misery. Unwillingly. ...


- - -


Weapons of Mass Destruction:
Nuclear / Biological / Chemical:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...c/arsenal.html

Excerpt: ... In summary, the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) report says that following the August 1990
invasion of Kuwait, Iraq launched a "crash program" to
develop a nuclear weapon quickly by extracting weapons
grade material from safe-guarded research reactor fuel.
This project, if it had continued uninterrupted by the war,
might have succeeded in producing a deliverable weapon
by the end of 1992.


... In its 1999 final report to the U.N. Security Council,
UNSCOM noted that Iraq's biological warfare program was
"among the most secretive of its programs of weapons of
mass destruction."


- - -


Inspections a Cure-All?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... The United Nations inspectors had a very mis-
guided opinion about what is disarmament. ... They thought
if you have something, I take it away from you, and you are
disarmed. Despite the knowledge you have, the expertise
you gained through the years, your contacts that could re-
purchase parts for you and put the thing back together. They
discounted all this. If you have a piece of equipment, they
take it away, and you are disarmed.


This is simplistic. They are not naïve; I talked to them. I talked
to many of the inspectors. We had some kind of give and take
in this. But they were restricted. ...


For example, on the nuclear ... the critical parts, that Iraq
could not replace easily, we did not tell about -- for example,
the molds that you make explosives with, the machines that
you make explosives with. Nobody is going to sell you these
anymore. Very difficult. So Iraq did not give these up. Not a
single explosive was given to the inspectors for the nuclear
weapon program. Not a single mold, not a single machine. ...


- - -


If Saddam Gets Nukes, What Will Happen?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... We are talking about now the future of the region.


Now, Saddam gets nuclear weapons, and he has already the
full range of the chemical and most of the range of the bio-
logical probably. ... The expertise are there, all the scientists
are there, and he has oil money, to a degree, not as much as
before. So what you are getting is a highly weaponized state
with a huge terror organ -- the government itself is a terror
organ, and several organizations that could be satellites to it,
including Al Qaeda. ...


A nuclear bomb would turn Saddam into a huge figure in the
region. Islamic fundamentalists and many of the Arab nation-
alists feel humiliated throughout this century -- the loss of
Palestine, the occupation of Arab land by the West, the humil-
iation of the region throughout the century; they'll be vindicated
with Saddam. Here is a man who can stand up to the West,
who made it, who has it, who can do it. He will be a huge figure
in the region.


And the Arab "street," which we used to think is not very im-
portant ... September 11 is telling us, now, is very important,
because 14 out of the 19 killer hijackers, 13 or 14, are Saudis,
which are basically U.S. allies. So the Saudi street is not
stable, is not happy, neither with the government nor with the
alliance. So what we are ending with us a breeding ground
of groups that would work outside the alliance structure and
could support whichever extremist regime they think is attrac-
tive to them.


... There was no choice. Absolutely no choice to removing Sad-
dam. No alternative. Saddam has to be removed. Otherwise,
what you'll have is the region going down the drain, eventually,
with all kinds of extremist groups, possible skirmishes, small
wars, all kinds of actions. ...


- - -


Terrorism Training Inside Iraq

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/khod...

Excerpt: ... And they trained people to hijack airplanes?


Yes.


For what purpose?


... It has been said openly in the media and even to us, from
the highest command, that the purpose of establishing Sad-
dam's fighters is to attack American targets and American
interests. This is known. There's no doubt about it.


All this training is directed towards attacking American targets,
and American interests. The training does not only include
hijacking of planes and sabotage. ... Some other people were
trained to do parachuting. Some other areas were training on
how to penetrate enemy lines and get information from behind
enemy lines. But it's all for the general concept of hitting and
attacking American targets and American interests. ...

joe

Joe wrote:


- - -

If Saddam Gets Nukes, What Will Happen?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... We are talking about now the future of the region.

Now, Saddam gets nuclear weapons, and he has already the
full range of the chemical and most of the range of the bio-
logical probably. ... The expertise are there, all the scientists


Joe, glad to see you're willing to quote from liberal site like PBS.ORG,
to bad you didn't post the codacil to this interview: "[Editor's Note,
November 2005: More than two years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq,
no evidence has surfaced showing that Saddam Hussein had had the
capability to deploy nuclear weapons. After Saddam's fall, Hamza was
appointed by the Coalition Provisional Authority to be senior adviser to
Iraq's Ministry of Science and Technology. In this role, he had partial
control of Iraq's nuclear and military industries. In March 2004,
Hamza's contract was not renewed. To date, he has not addressed
questions about the failure to find weapons of mass destruction.]"

Hmmm.... I wonder how much else you left out, quoting zealous refugees
from Saddam's scourge hardly constitutes credible evidence



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/khod...

This link points to nowhere.

Cheers
Marty

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...


The real issues, not MMC anti USA propaganda

Joe,
Not wanting to take over the world is "anti American"? What was your first
book? Here ya go buddy http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/
Sounds a little more in line with your rhetoric,
MMC

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
The fact Saddam was a totalitarian dictator and that the freedom and
liberty of Iraqis are voided by his continued
dictatorship seems to have escaped the supposed moral concerns of the
French, Germans, Russians, Chinese, and Vatican.

Nothing to do with the invaision according to Bushco's rhetoric.

1) 12 years of continued torture, rape, murder, and totalitar-
ianism by Saddam and Saddam's cronies against the
people of Iraq,

Nothing to do with the invaision according to Bushco's rhetoric.

2) Saddam's use of biochemical weapons against the Kurds
and Iranians,

Nothing to do with the invaision according to Bushco's rhetoric.

3) Saddam's starvation of groups out of favor with the ruling
regime (Marsh Arabs),

Nothing to do with the invaision according to Bushco's rhetoric.

4) Saddam's construction of mosques and palaces of enormous
opulence as his people suffered,

Nothing to do with the invaision according to Bushco's rhetoric.

5) Saddam's continued development of weapons of mass destruc-
tion,

Untrue. Propaganda that was disproved many times over.

6) Saddam's alliances with and assistance to likeminded terrorist
entities,

Untrue. Propaganda that was disproved many times over.

7) Saddam's refusal to cooperate and pro-actively assist the inspec-
tors in a genuine effort to rid itself of weapons of mass destruction,

Saddam's posturing was a miscalculation, but it wouldn't have mattered.
Bushco was going to invade no matter what.

8) Saddam's treating his commitments to disarm as burdens to be
avoided rather than as obligations to be fulfilled (disarmament
as a game, rather than as a goal),

So what? He didn't have anything to disarm.

9) Saddam's financial support of Palestinian suicider-mass murder-
er organizations in a public display of hatred for human life,

Along with Iran and Syria.

10) Saddam's past atrocities committed against the peoples of
Kuwait and Israel and Iran,

Nothing to do with the invaision according to Bushco's rhetoric.

11) Saddam's past efforts to develop nuclear weapons (only
stopped due to Israeli bombing of a nuclear reactor and,
later on, the expulsion of Iraq from Kuwait and the surprising
discovery, thereafter, that Iraq was within two years of devel-
oping nuclear weapons),

Key phrase, "past efforts." Iraq was no where near having them or even
seriously contemplating such a program.

12) freedom and liberty for the Iraqi people, a people who have
been bullied and murdered into submission to totalitarianism,

Nothing to do with the invaision according to Bushco's rhetoric.

13) defense of the United States, a country vulnerable to attacks
from mass murdering Islamist terrorists who could easily find
succor and WMD from an American-hating tyrant,

Bzzzt. Saddam hated and feared Islamic terrorists and never cooperated with
them.

14) prevention of the Saddam-Islamist-terrorist goal of a united
Arabia confronting the west (Saddam's goal was a united Arabia
led by Saddam -- Islamists' goal, worldwide conquest led
by a strong leader and the strongest leader in Arabia was
Saddam),

Complete fabrication on the part of Bushco.

15) reducing the likelihood that Iran will develop nukes by removing
Iran's feeling it must do so to protect against its arch enemy,
Saddam,

Try picking up a newspaper... that's exactly what they're doing, NOW. Stupid
they're not.

16) increasing pressure on Saudi Arabia to deal with the terrorist
elements which are widespread in its midst due to Wahabism,

By invading Iraq? What kind of delusion is this?

17) the historical record which clearly demonstrates that pacifism-
appeasement-diplomacy are inept when confronting totalitarian-
ism led by a belligerent and powerful foe -- reference the Treaty
of Versailles and its lack of enforcement by France and Great
Britain as Hitler violated its tenets, re-armed, re-militarized the
Rhineland, and (unopposed until it was too late) set out to con-
quer most of Europe and Russia, allied with Japan in its effort
to dominate the Far East (an effort which led to the attack on
the U.S. at Pearl Harbor), -and- committed the systematic mass
murder of the handicapped, Jews, homosexual men, and any-
one else opposed to Hitler's tyranny.

Nothing to do with Saddam or his capabilities.




References:


- - -


Is he at war?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl.../synopsis.html

Excerpt: ... In the 10 years since the Gulf War ended,
Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has said that he has
always considered himself at war with America. And
during that time, the U.S. has always considered him
a threat. ...


- - -


Motive:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/mylr...

Excerpt: ... Saddam's view of the utility of violence is
entirely different than ours. ... Saddam sees violence as
something that can achieve his goals. He sees a utility in
violence. In addition, Saddam seeks revenge against the
United States, to do to us what we have done to Iraq. ...


- - -


Primary goal/character (1 of 2):

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...terviews/aburi...

Excerpt: ... Saddam Hussein thinks he talks to god. He has
a message--he has to lead Iraq, make it a model for the Arab
countries and then attract the rest of the Arab countries and
become the sole Arab leader of modern times.


... There is no stopping the man. He always has things in
focus. He never misses a beat. In terms of what the country's
all about, and in terms of where his country fits in the whole
world. ...


- - -


Primary goal/character (2 of 2):

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... Saddam is very vengeful, and Saddam believes
in getting back and attacking. ...


- - -


Saddam and weapons of mass destruction - differing
views of Arabs and Iraqis, generally speaking:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...terviews/aburi...

Excerpt: ... I don't think there was any Arab in the seventies
who did not want Saddam Hussein to have an atomic weapon.
They wanted him to have military parity. Israel had atomic
weapons. The Arabs wanted an Arab country to have atomic
weapons. Iraq was the head of the pack and therefore all
Arabs supported Saddam Hussein. ... I don't think there are
many Arabs at this moment in time ... who do not want Sad-
dam Hussein to have an atomic weapon now.


... there is a division between the vision of Saddam Hussein
that the Iraqis have and the vision of Saddam Hussein the
rest of the Arabs have. To the rest of the Arabs, he is the
man standing up to West. To the Iraqis, he is the man who
dragged us into this state of misery. Unwillingly. ...


- - -


Weapons of Mass Destruction:
Nuclear / Biological / Chemical:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...c/arsenal.html

Excerpt: ... In summary, the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) report says that following the August 1990
invasion of Kuwait, Iraq launched a "crash program" to
develop a nuclear weapon quickly by extracting weapons
grade material from safe-guarded research reactor fuel.
This project, if it had continued uninterrupted by the war,
might have succeeded in producing a deliverable weapon
by the end of 1992.


... In its 1999 final report to the U.N. Security Council,
UNSCOM noted that Iraq's biological warfare program was
"among the most secretive of its programs of weapons of
mass destruction."


- - -


Inspections a Cure-All?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... The United Nations inspectors had a very mis-
guided opinion about what is disarmament. ... They thought
if you have something, I take it away from you, and you are
disarmed. Despite the knowledge you have, the expertise
you gained through the years, your contacts that could re-
purchase parts for you and put the thing back together. They
discounted all this. If you have a piece of equipment, they
take it away, and you are disarmed.


This is simplistic. They are not naïve; I talked to them. I talked
to many of the inspectors. We had some kind of give and take
in this. But they were restricted. ...


For example, on the nuclear ... the critical parts, that Iraq
could not replace easily, we did not tell about -- for example,
the molds that you make explosives with, the machines that
you make explosives with. Nobody is going to sell you these
anymore. Very difficult. So Iraq did not give these up. Not a
single explosive was given to the inspectors for the nuclear
weapon program. Not a single mold, not a single machine. ...


- - -


If Saddam Gets Nukes, What Will Happen?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/hamz...

Excerpt: ... We are talking about now the future of the region.


Now, Saddam gets nuclear weapons, and he has already the
full range of the chemical and most of the range of the bio-
logical probably. ... The expertise are there, all the scientists
are there, and he has oil money, to a degree, not as much as
before. So what you are getting is a highly weaponized state
with a huge terror organ -- the government itself is a terror
organ, and several organizations that could be satellites to it,
including Al Qaeda. ...


A nuclear bomb would turn Saddam into a huge figure in the
region. Islamic fundamentalists and many of the Arab nation-
alists feel humiliated throughout this century -- the loss of
Palestine, the occupation of Arab land by the West, the humil-
iation of the region throughout the century; they'll be vindicated
with Saddam. Here is a man who can stand up to the West,
who made it, who has it, who can do it. He will be a huge figure
in the region.


And the Arab "street," which we used to think is not very im-
portant ... September 11 is telling us, now, is very important,
because 14 out of the 19 killer hijackers, 13 or 14, are Saudis,
which are basically U.S. allies. So the Saudi street is not
stable, is not happy, neither with the government nor with the
alliance. So what we are ending with us a breeding ground
of groups that would work outside the alliance structure and
could support whichever extremist regime they think is attrac-
tive to them.


... There was no choice. Absolutely no choice to removing Sad-
dam. No alternative. Saddam has to be removed. Otherwise,
what you'll have is the region going down the drain, eventually,
with all kinds of extremist groups, possible skirmishes, small
wars, all kinds of actions. ...


- - -


Terrorism Training Inside Iraq

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...nterviews/khod...

Excerpt: ... And they trained people to hijack airplanes?


Yes.


For what purpose?


... It has been said openly in the media and even to us, from
the highest command, that the purpose of establishing Sad-
dam's fighters is to attack American targets and American
interests. This is known. There's no doubt about it.


All this training is directed towards attacking American targets,
and American interests. The training does not only include
hijacking of planes and sabotage. ... Some other people were
trained to do parachuting. Some other areas were training on
how to penetrate enemy lines and get information from behind
enemy lines. But it's all for the general concept of hitting and
attacking American targets and American interests. ...

joe

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Now Oz'es monopoly grain export company AWB faces the loss of its
67-year-old government-sanctioned stranglehold on exports after the
Cole report into the company's $290 million in kickbacks to Iraq this
week recommended possible criminal charges against 11 former executives
and an oil businessman.

Sorry *******s helped Saddam snub his nose at UN sanctions after the
first gulf war. If these traitors did not help Saddam then perhaps the
war would not have been needed. Perhaps sanctions would have worked.

Joe


The UN really has no jurisdiction anywhere. They're a bunch of showboating
pansies. Sending grain to Iraq? Those guys going to jail? hahahaha! What
about the French that sold him parts to build nukuler bombs? Let's round up
those that sold Iraq band aids and baby formula too!

Todd