Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:01:38 -0500, DSK said: Before I begin, let me say I couldn't agree with you more that tariffs on sugar, like tariffs on most if not all goods are poor policy and should be abandoned. What I don't understand is why they don't convert the sugar to Splenda, thus still using the product so that sugar beet and cane farmers can still market their crops, but lowering the harmful aspects of sugar....it's a win/win situation... |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
katy wrote:
What I don't understand is why they don't convert the sugar to Splenda, Splenda? I'd rather eat earthworms with Vegamite served in a cedar bucket. //Walt |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
katysails wrote:
What I don't understand is why they don't convert the sugar to Splenda, Walt wrote: Splenda? I'd rather eat earthworms with Vegamite served in a cedar bucket. With squirty cheese on top. DSK |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
katysails wrote: What I don't understand is why they don't convert the sugar to Splenda, Walt wrote: Splenda? I'd rather eat earthworms with Vegamite served in a cedar bucket. With squirty cheese on top. DSK If you were saying Natrasweet or saccharin, I could understand...SPlenda does not have a chemical aftertaste and withstands temperature change, which Nutrasweet does not...and it doesn't convert to formaldehyde like Nutrasweet... |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote in message ... . . .and it doesn't convert to formaldehyde like Nutrasweet... Yeah, but think how well-preserved you'd be with Nutrasweet. Max |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... . . .and it doesn't convert to formaldehyde like Nutrasweet... Yeah, but think how well-preserved you'd be with Nutrasweet. Max ....with Alzheimer's.... |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
katy wrote: What I don't understand is why they don't convert the sugar to Splenda, Splenda? I'd rather eat earthworms with Vegamite served in a cedar bucket. //Walt I've substituted Splenda in many recipes that I've served people and they never knew it wasn't sugar... |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote : katy wrote: What I don't understand is why they don't convert the sugar to Splenda, Splenda? I'd rather eat earthworms with Vegamite served in a cedar bucket. //Walt I've substituted Splenda in many recipes that I've served people and they never knew it wasn't sugar... sugar's a quick burn sort of thing. Think of the quantitudes of fats Americans chow down at every turn. And then have to ":jog" off again. I had lunch at a place in Miami that the meal had to have weighed at least 10lbs. on the plate. It was gross. What was worse was just throwing all that untouched mountain of food away. Seahag |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've substituted Splenda in many recipes that I've served
people and they never knew it wasn't sugar... Maybe they were too polite to tell you? Maybe the horrid aftertaste was disguised by all that jalapeno? Seahag wrote: sugar's a quick burn sort of thing. Think of the quantitudes of fats Americans chow down at every turn. And then have to ":jog" off again. Yep, Atkins had at least one thing right... the type of calories makes a difference. I had lunch at a place in Miami that the meal had to have weighed at least 10lbs. on the plate. It was gross. What was worse was just throwing all that untouched mountain of food away. A lot of people have also been conditioned to not throw food away. I'm working on not buying it in the first place... saves money too. DSK |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
I've substituted Splenda in many recipes that I've served people and they never knew it wasn't sugar... Maybe they were too polite to tell you? Nah..it was family..if they didn't like it they'd say so...vociferously... Maybe the horrid aftertaste was disguised by all that jalapeno SOn't use jalepeno's...there is no horrid aftertaste with Splenda... ? Seahag wrote: sugar's a quick burn sort of thing. Think of the quantitudes of fats Americans chow down at every turn. And then have to ":jog" off again. Yep, Atkins had at least one thing right... the type of calories makes a difference. I had lunch at a place in Miami that the meal had to have weighed at least 10lbs. on the plate. It was gross. What was worse was just throwing all that untouched mountain of food away. A lot of people have also been conditioned to not throw food away. I'm working on not buying it in the first place... saves money too. DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pretty but unsailable | Boat Building |