Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thankfully, the 2006 hurricane season is over. The same models and
scientists used for predicting global warming scenarios predicted one of the worst, if not perhaps the worst, hurricane seasons in recorded history. No less than 1/2 dozen major hurricanes were to sweep North America. Shorelines were to be stripped, coastal areas ravaged by relentless super hurricanes. New Orleans was merely a warm up act. Let's be thankful for the useful climate models that accurately predicted and helped us prepare for the most cataclysmic hurricane season ever. If it wasn't for these accurate, reliable models and claims of knowledgeable scientists, people would not have been prepared. Let's also be thankful that these very same models and scientists can look decades, even 100 years reliably and accurately into the future and tell us what the weather and climate will be. http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBHKNBE0VE.html I am very thankful because I am adapting a global warming model to the stock market so I can accurately forecast for next year, the next decade and into my grandchildren's future to secure their financial well being. |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gilligan wrote: Thankfully, the 2006 hurricane season is over. The same models and scientists used for predicting global warming scenarios predicted one of the worst, if not perhaps the worst, hurricane seasons in recorded history. No less than 1/2 dozen major hurricanes were to sweep North America. Shorelines were to be stripped, coastal areas ravaged by relentless super hurricanes. New Orleans was merely a warm up act. Let's be thankful for the useful climate models that accurately predicted and helped us prepare for the most cataclysmic hurricane season ever. If it wasn't for these accurate, reliable models and claims of knowledgeable scientists, people would not have been prepared. Let's also be thankful that these very same models and scientists can look decades, even 100 years reliably and accurately into the future and tell us what the weather and climate will be. http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBHKNBE0VE.html I am very thankful because I am adapting a global warming model to the stock market so I can accurately forecast for next year, the next decade and into my grandchildren's future to secure their financial well being. I bet allot of people lost thier asses in the timber (plywood) futures mkt. Bright side is I bet you can pick up a genset real cheap about now. Joe |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gilligan" wrote | Thankfully, the 2006 hurricane season is over. The same models and | scientists used for predicting global warming scenarios predicted one of the | worst, if not perhaps the worst, hurricane seasons in recorded history. No | less than 1/2 dozen major hurricanes were to sweep North America. Shorelines | were to be stripped, coastal areas ravaged by relentless super hurricanes. | New Orleans was merely a warm up act. | | Let's be thankful for the useful climate models that accurately predicted | and helped us prepare for the most cataclysmic hurricane season ever. If it | wasn't for these accurate, reliable models and claims of knowledgeable | scientists, people would not have been prepared. Let's also be thankful that | these very same models and scientists can look decades, even 100 years | reliably and accurately into the future and tell us what the weather and | climate will be. | | http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBHKNBE0VE.html | | I am very thankful because I am adapting a global warming model to the stock | market so I can accurately forecast for next year, the next decade and into | my grandchildren's future to secure their financial well being. Do I detect a little sarcasm here???? giggles Your a hoot, Gilligan I call it the one/two slap in the face. The one slap is the forecast that's crap. The two slap tells us why the first slap stunk. It tells it as if they knew why all along. Won't they ever just come out and say they screwed up royally? Won't they ever admit they don't really know jack. Don't hold your breath..... And, we're supposed to take them seriously when they talk about global warming *climate* change. They can't predict accurately day to day, week to week, month to month, year to year. That's a fact. So they actually expect us to believe them when they try to predict like fifty years to a hundred years? Duh! Cheers, Ellen |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gilligan" wrote | http://wwwa.accuweather.com/promotio...aw&page=nehurr Certainly is a joke, isn't it? Joe *******i needs to spend less time in the gym and more time going to weather school..... Cheers, Ellen |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gilligan" wrote | http://wwwa.accuweather.com/promo-ad...&page=hurr2006 This is the biggest disgrace: http://vortex.accuweather.com/adc200...06/hurrisk.jpg How dare they? Cheers, Ellen |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gilligan wrote: http://wwwa.accuweather.com/promo-ad...&page=hurr2006 26 named storms predicited..How these clowns can keep a straight face cashing a paycheck is amazing. I could toss chicken bones in the water and make a more accurate forecast. Joe |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:46:38 -0700, "Gilligan"
wrote: Thankfully, the 2006 hurricane season is over. The same models and scientists used for predicting global warming scenarios predicted one of the worst, if not perhaps the worst, hurricane seasons in recorded history. No less than 1/2 dozen major hurricanes were to sweep North America. Shorelines were to be stripped, coastal areas ravaged by relentless super hurricanes. New Orleans was merely a warm up act. Let's be thankful for the useful climate models that accurately predicted and helped us prepare for the most cataclysmic hurricane season ever. If it wasn't for these accurate, reliable models and claims of knowledgeable scientists, people would not have been prepared. Let's also be thankful that these very same models and scientists can look decades, even 100 years reliably and accurately into the future and tell us what the weather and climate will be. http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBHKNBE0VE.html I am very thankful because I am adapting a global warming model to the stock market so I can accurately forecast for next year, the next decade and into my grandchildren's future to secure their financial well being. Does this mean I can go ahead and build on the coast now? Frank |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Boettcher wrote:
Does this mean I can go ahead and build on the coast now? Oh absolutely. According to Gilly logic, since global warming is false there won't be any more hurricanes. //Walt |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2006 End of Season First Season report | ASA | |||
Hurricane boat opinions? | Cruising | |||
Last trip of the season | General | |||
Anyone Else Watching Hurricane Isabel? | General |