"Gilligan" wrote
| Thankfully, the 2006 hurricane season is over. The same models and
| scientists used for predicting global warming scenarios predicted one of the
| worst, if not perhaps the worst, hurricane seasons in recorded history. No
| less than 1/2 dozen major hurricanes were to sweep North America. Shorelines
| were to be stripped, coastal areas ravaged by relentless super hurricanes.
| New Orleans was merely a warm up act.
|
| Let's be thankful for the useful climate models that accurately predicted
| and helped us prepare for the most cataclysmic hurricane season ever. If it
| wasn't for these accurate, reliable models and claims of knowledgeable
| scientists, people would not have been prepared. Let's also be thankful that
| these very same models and scientists can look decades, even 100 years
| reliably and accurately into the future and tell us what the weather and
| climate will be.
|
| http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBHKNBE0VE.html
|
| I am very thankful because I am adapting a global warming model to the stock
| market so I can accurately forecast for next year, the next decade and into
| my grandchildren's future to secure their financial well being.


Do I detect a little sarcasm here???? giggles Your a hoot, Gilligan
I call it the one/two slap in the face. The one slap is the forecast that's crap. The two slap
tells us why the first slap stunk. It tells it as if they knew why all along. Won't they ever just
come out and say they screwed up royally? Won't they ever admit they don't really know jack.
Don't hold your breath..... And, we're supposed to take them seriously when they talk about
global warming *climate* change. They can't predict accurately day to day, week to week,
month to month, year to year. That's a fact. So they actually expect us to believe them when
they try to predict like fifty years to a hundred years? Duh!


Cheers,
Ellen