Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I get sick of it. I get sick of men always trying to touch my breasts. *Copping a feel*
is what some of 'em call it. What's with this fascination men have for breasts. Uh, guys, get a clue. Breasts are for feeding babies. They're not there for you to lust after, grope, suck on the teatties etc. Where'd you ever get the idea breasts are sex objects? I think I finally figured it out. It dawned on me this morning. I was in the shower and when I got out it was chilly and my nipples got hard. That's it! Men never really got off the nipple. They never got weaned. They want to suck nipples for the rest of their lives. So what they do so they can keep sucking on teatties is turn them into a sex object. That way they can pretend to be doing sex when what they really want is to be a baby again and suck on a teatty. Grow up guys. Look but don't touch.... If you really wanna suck on something for sex there's plenty down there between a girl's legs for that. ;-) Cheers, Ellen |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ellen MacArthur wrote:
I get sick of it. [snipped puerile drivel] Yeah, to paraphrase your illustrious leader, "We're plenty sick of you!" Cheers Marty ------------ And now a word from our sponsor --------------------- For a secure high performance FTP using SSL/TLS encryption upgrade to SurgeFTP ---- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_surgeftp.htm ---- |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I believe someone here prefers this to breasts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzjgYaair1Y Who could that be??????? |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pup Socket" wrote | I believe someone here prefers this to breasts: | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzjgYaair1Y | Who could that be??????? Either that Foley guy or Jonathan Ganz? Cheers, Ellen |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Baxter" wrote | Yeah, to paraphrase your illustrious leader, "We're plenty sick of you!" What? Who ARE you talking about? Forget it. But, what about my rights? Did you even think about what I said before you deleted it? Got a closed mind? Prurient interests easily aroused? Look at it this way. Women have breasts. Men have breasts. The only difference is ours are usually bigger than yours and they produce milk. The reason we have breasts is to nurse babies. They've got nothing to do with sex. They certainly aren't a *sex organ*. But we have to keep ours covered in public or else we're *exposing* ourselves. If a man takes off his shirt in public is he *exposing* himself? No. Men can only *expose* themselves if they take off their britches. So why the double freakin' standard? You can bet men started it/not women. So men make women cover our breasts by saying they're a sex organ. Duh! Think about it. Men gave themselves the right to tell us what we can and can't do with a part of our bodies that has NOTHING to do with sex. Just as a man's breast has nothing to do with sex. So why don't you guys keep your breasts covered? Your breast just sit there. They're useless. It would make more sense to say THEY were sex organs. They ain't good for anything else. If they serve some other function tell me. How would you guys like it if women went around telling you to cover up your chest? I think if you look at this objectively you'll agree with me. Your control of our breasts has everything to do with never wanting to let go of them. The first time you sucked a nipple when you were an infant you got addicted. Admit it. What other reason is there that would make you so protective of something that isn't even your own? Your hiding your drug stash! So don't call my thoughts puerile. They make sense. They're mature. They're original. If you think they're puerile maybe it's because you think like a little boy.... Cheers, Ellen |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ellen MacArthur wrote: "Martin Baxter" wrote | Yeah, to paraphrase your illustrious leader, "We're plenty sick of you!" What? Who ARE you talking about? Forget it. But, what about my rights? Did you even think about what I said before you deleted it? Got a closed mind? Prurient interests easily aroused? Look at it this way. Women have breasts. Men have breasts. The only difference is ours are usually bigger than yours and they produce milk. The reason we have breasts is to nurse babies. They've got nothing to do with sex. They certainly aren't a *sex organ*. But we have to keep ours covered in public or else we're *exposing* ourselves. If a man takes off his shirt in public is he *exposing* himself? No. Men can only *expose* themselves if they take off their britches. So why the double freakin' standard? You can bet men started it/not women. So men make women cover our breasts by saying they're a sex organ. Duh! Think about it. Men gave themselves the right to tell us what we can and can't do with a part of our bodies that has NOTHING to do with sex. Just as a man's breast has nothing to do with sex. So why don't you guys keep your breasts covered? Your breast just sit there. They're useless. It would make more sense to say THEY were sex organs. They ain't good for anything else. If they serve some other function tell me. How would you guys like it if women went around telling you to cover up your chest? I think if you look at this objectively you'll agree with me. Your control of our breasts has everything to do with never wanting to let go of them. The first time you sucked a nipple when you were an infant you got addicted. Admit it. What other reason is there that would make you so protective of something that isn't even your own? Your hiding your drug stash! So don't call my thoughts puerile. They make sense. They're mature. They're original. If you think they're puerile maybe it's because you think like a little boy.... Cheers, Ellen "YAWN" |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote | "YAWN" O'Hara, I don't blame you for getting tired. There's a lot there to read. Plenty of truth to it too. But, didn't your mama teach you not to yawn in public? Shame! Cheers, Ellen |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ellen MacArthur wrote: wrote | "YAWN" O'Hara, I don't blame you for getting tired. There's a lot there to read. Plenty of truth to it too. But, didn't your mama teach you not to yawn in public? Shame! Cheers, Ellen "Ellen", man boobs disgust me. |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So don't call my thoughts puerile. They make sense. They're mature. They're original. Well yeh Ellen... I guess so from your perception of things. Which I respect... Yet on the other hand... most of us guys have always admired women that are "heavily endowed" so to speak. Then again... maybe there is some sort of a maternal instinct within us that enhances this attraction. So f*cking what... I have never questioned it or felt guilt about it. All I know is... a good looking gal that is well endowed (providing she is not a "sweat hog") is a thing of beauty. Some of us old farts will remember the Vargas girls that True magazine (or whatever it was called) use to print. Talk about artistic symetrical design/presentation... wow!! In closing what I am about to say... is I am most certain will be "rude... crude... and socially unatractive" to some... but I also subscribe to the maucho theory that anything more than a mouth- full is a waste. A good looking gal with a pleasant figure is something to be admired by us guys. Assuming you are for real... and not a sock puppet of you know who... you have displayed your "feminist" side... which is cool aka kewl (smile)... that is you... I guess. Respectfully Bill |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... So don't call my thoughts puerile. They make sense. They're mature. They're original. Well yeh Ellen... I guess so from your perception of things. Which I respect... Yet on the other hand... most of us guys have always admired women that are "heavily endowed" so to speak. Then again... maybe there is some sort of a maternal instinct within us that enhances this attraction. So f*cking what... I have never questioned it or felt guilt about it. All I know is... a good looking gal that is well endowed (providing she is not a "sweat hog") is a thing of beauty. Some of us old farts will remember the Vargas girls that True magazine (or whatever it was called) use to print. Talk about artistic symetrical design/presentation... wow!! In closing what I am about to say... is I am most certain will be "rude... crude... and socially unatractive" to some... but I also subscribe to the maucho theory that anything more than a mouth- full is a waste. A good looking gal with a pleasant figure is something to be admired by us guys. Assuming you are for real... and not a sock puppet of you know who... you have displayed your "feminist" side... which is cool aka kewl (smile)... that is you... I guess. Bad assumption Bill... |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Off Topic Posting Has Finally Hit Its Inevitable Bottom. | General | |||
Best Topic of 2005 | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
This newsgroup is at least 71% off topic posts - TAKE IT SOMEPLACE ELSE! | General | |||
DC rated rocker switches? | Electronics |