"katy" wrote in message
...
Gilligan wrote:
"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Ah, but I've plonked him, so all I see are the replies to his crapola. I
don't care what he calls me. Never have, never will. Why do you think
otherwise? Bob is a pathetic guy, who is desperate for attention and
deserving of our sympathy. Since you feel the need to respond to him,
you're one who's feeding his psychosis. You might want to rethink it.

I think he is entertaining. Sometimes a bit over the top, sometimes
cruel. I don't respond to him all the time. I have a good respect for his
trolling ability, insight into psychology and the guy is no dummy. He is
also very resourceful and works diligently for things he wants.


Pool of sharks?? Now that's funny. This is Usenet. I couldn't care less
what goes on here. I only care about things when they go beyond this
fiction into the real world. This has happened on occasion,
unfortunately.

Sharks.

Bob isn't going away, even though I (certainly) mostly ignore him. I
don't care either way, actually. He's been here a long, long time. At
one point, he actually contributed in an interesting and useful way.
This changed a few years ago, so something must have changed
dramatically in his life... for the worse I'm sure.

He does add value besides the entertainment. I value his opinions on just
about anything. I don't always agree. He can save someone a lot of money
and headache. I'm following his advice on cameras and buying a Nikon. He
can be very helpful.

In the past, I certainly did my bit of name-calling, etc. People change,
and I decided quite a while ago not to engage in that, since mostly the
people are not worth the candle. I hope I've changed for the better.
Clearly, some people either can't or won't change. The former have
mental problems and need help. There are a couple of people like that...
no need to name names. The latter are just stuborn, and I like them a
lot better. :-)


You did change for the better by practicing amazing restraint. Just don't
show you get irritated and they will leave you alone. You have the
potential to some excellent trolling if you desire. You could even be
trolling now by pretending they get to you, who knows?

How did this weekend go? Did you see the Blue Angels?



I saw white angels this weekend....

Sure they weren't albino flying monkeys?

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Nutsy,

I read all your stupid BS along with your purchase. It seems to me, I
remember you boasting about the wonderful condition of the sails on the
"Benny" at the time of purchase. Also you posts of all the boats on your
end of the 'Sound' that you 'Cleaned their Clock'

Tell us Nutsy, Why in the first season of sailing are you buying new
sais?

???Do believed you caught yourself in your own Lies once again. Still
in top form for slipping on your own S--T!

Go ahead; I've got a good grip on my chair. Firer Away with another dumb
rebuttal. I'm ready:^)

TS or better known as Beached Bum


Good detective work there Thom. Book'em Dano!

Thom Stewart wrote:
Nutsy,

I read all your stupid BS along with your purchase. It seems to me, I
remember you boasting about the wonderful condition of the sails on the
"Benny" at the time of purchase. Also you posts of all the boats on your
end of the 'Sound' that you 'Cleaned their Clock'

Tell us Nutsy, Why in the first season of sailing are you buying new
sais?

???Do believed you caught yourself in your own Lies once again. Still
in top form for slipping on your own S--T!

Go ahead; I've got a good grip on my chair. Firer Away with another dumb
rebuttal. I'm ready:^)

TS or better known as Beached Bum

Ya know...to be culpable for lying you have to make a conscious decision
to lie...seeing that BS has no conscience to be conscious of, he cannot
lie.

It's only entertaining when he's showing off his ignorance about sailing.
It's not entertaining when he's bragging about whatever. He's no dummy for
sure, but he's not a grownup either. He's a known liar and a thief.

And, you're wrong about "them leaving me alone" if I show restraint. That's
not going to happen, because there are underlying psychological problems
with "them." Yeah, I'm trolling... whatever.

Blue Angels were fantastic as usual. I'll have some pictures uploaded as
soon as work gives me a break.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Ah, but I've plonked him, so all I see are the replies to his crapola. I
don't care what he calls me. Never have, never will. Why do you think
otherwise? Bob is a pathetic guy, who is desperate for attention and
deserving of our sympathy. Since you feel the need to respond to him,
you're one who's feeding his psychosis. You might want to rethink it.

I think he is entertaining. Sometimes a bit over the top, sometimes cruel.
I don't respond to him all the time. I have a good respect for his
trolling ability, insight into psychology and the guy is no dummy. He is
also very resourceful and works diligently for things he wants.



Pool of sharks?? Now that's funny. This is Usenet. I couldn't care less
what goes on here. I only care about things when they go beyond this
fiction into the real world. This has happened on occasion,
unfortunately.

Sharks.


Bob isn't going away, even though I (certainly) mostly ignore him. I
don't care either way, actually. He's been here a long, long time. At one
point, he actually contributed in an interesting and useful way. This
changed a few years ago, so something must have changed dramatically in
his life... for the worse I'm sure.

He does add value besides the entertainment. I value his opinions on just
about anything. I don't always agree. He can save someone a lot of money
and headache. I'm following his advice on cameras and buying a Nikon. He
can be very helpful.


In the past, I certainly did my bit of name-calling, etc. People change,
and I decided quite a while ago not to engage in that, since mostly the
people are not worth the candle. I hope I've changed for the better.
Clearly, some people either can't or won't change. The former have mental
problems and need help. There are a couple of people like that... no need
to name names. The latter are just stuborn, and I like them a lot better.
:-)


You did change for the better by practicing amazing restraint. Just don't
show you get irritated and they will leave you alone. You have the
potential to some excellent trolling if you desire. You could even be
trolling now by pretending they get to you, who knows?

How did this weekend go? Did you see the Blue Angels?

Gilligan wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...
Gilligan wrote:
"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Ah, but I've plonked him, so all I see are the replies to his crapola. I
don't care what he calls me. Never have, never will. Why do you think
otherwise? Bob is a pathetic guy, who is desperate for attention and
deserving of our sympathy. Since you feel the need to respond to him,
you're one who's feeding his psychosis. You might want to rethink it.
I think he is entertaining. Sometimes a bit over the top, sometimes
cruel. I don't respond to him all the time. I have a good respect for his
trolling ability, insight into psychology and the guy is no dummy. He is
also very resourceful and works diligently for things he wants.


Pool of sharks?? Now that's funny. This is Usenet. I couldn't care less
what goes on here. I only care about things when they go beyond this
fiction into the real world. This has happened on occasion,
unfortunately.
Sharks.

Bob isn't going away, even though I (certainly) mostly ignore him. I
don't care either way, actually. He's been here a long, long time. At
one point, he actually contributed in an interesting and useful way.
This changed a few years ago, so something must have changed
dramatically in his life... for the worse I'm sure.
He does add value besides the entertainment. I value his opinions on just
about anything. I don't always agree. He can save someone a lot of money
and headache. I'm following his advice on cameras and buying a Nikon. He
can be very helpful.

In the past, I certainly did my bit of name-calling, etc. People change,
and I decided quite a while ago not to engage in that, since mostly the
people are not worth the candle. I hope I've changed for the better.
Clearly, some people either can't or won't change. The former have
mental problems and need help. There are a couple of people like that...
no need to name names. The latter are just stuborn, and I like them a
lot better. :-)

You did change for the better by practicing amazing restraint. Just don't
show you get irritated and they will leave you alone. You have the
potential to some excellent trolling if you desire. You could even be
trolling now by pretending they get to you, who knows?

How did this weekend go? Did you see the Blue Angels?



I saw white angels this weekend....

Sure they weren't albino flying monkeys?


No...when U ciiked one it tasted like chicken....

Go ahead; I've got a good grip on my chair. Firer Away with another
dumb
rebuttal. I'm ready:^)


The 35s5 sails were said to be in great shape....but here's what I
found during the full survey. The mylar main was badly stained with
mildew. An effort was made to wash it...a no-no, and it suffered even
more. The owner said I'd get a season out of it and he was right. The
110% was in the same kind of shape, more ugly than worn, but now has
some delamination. The 155 is in good shape, but FAR too much sail for
the boat. I'll probably sell it off at some point. The chute is
practically new. The heavier storm sail is unused. So in short it was a
mixed bag. I paid less for the boat after the sails were surveyed.
I've bought very nice sails to replace these and I'm excited to get
them up!

I've e-mailed you the deal I got....


RB
35s5
NY

It's hard to disagree with this...

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"katy" wrote in message
...
Thom Stewart wrote:
Nutsy,

I read all your stupid BS along with your purchase. It seems to me, I
remember you boasting about the wonderful condition of the sails on the
"Benny" at the time of purchase. Also you posts of all the boats on your
end of the 'Sound' that you 'Cleaned their Clock'

Tell us Nutsy, Why in the first season of sailing are you buying new
sais?

???Do believed you caught yourself in your own Lies once again. Still
in top form for slipping on your own S--T!

Go ahead; I've got a good grip on my chair. Firer Away with another dumb
rebuttal. I'm ready:^)

TS or better known as Beached Bum

Ya know...to be culpable for lying you have to make a conscious decision
to lie...seeing that BS has no conscience to be conscious of, he cannot
lie.

The 155 is in good shape, but FAR too much sail for
the boat..

Boy that must be one stiff boat.

35s5 too tippy for a #1. ROFLOL.................

Boy that must be one stiff boat.

35s5 too tippy for a #1.




It's a fractional rig, dummy! I'm trying to think of how many times my
J29 and J30 sailing friends with fractional rigs fly their big
headsails....almost never. Nor does Mark P. who owns Doyle sails here
along with a C&C 41. He agrees that a 110 is fine most of the time on
his CF fractional.
A 155 on a fractional rig, Sloco? How often is THAT needed?! Where do
you sail...in a CAVE????

BWAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHA!


RB
35s5
NY

Boob, who are you trying to kid. "People with frac rigs on LIS don't
use their #1s" What are they a bunch of pussys?

35s5 toooooooooo tender for a #1